Reprints of 2005 Services - Discussions

For current month's reprints refer to webdoc4, for earlier records refer to the ARCHIVE File


The TEMPLER RECORD together with the WARTE DES TEMPELS carry an account of all the Templer community activities. Click 'Templer Record' for Australia, and 'Warte des Tempels' for Germany to see the current month's content reprinted in full.

SERVICES:

New Year's Eve Service in Bentleigh, Rolf Beilharz
New Year's Eve Service in Bayswater, Alfred Klink
Sunday Service in Bentleigh 27 November, Theo Richter
Sunday Service in Bentleigh 30 October, Alfred Klink
Family Service at badger Creek 2 October, Christine Ruff
Evensong in Bentleigh 25 September, Renate Weber
Fathers' Day Service 4 September in Bayswater, Mark Herrmann
Confirmation Service 14 August, Renate Weber
Service in Bayswater 10 July, Rolf Beilharz
Saal in Bayswater 3. July, Alfred Klink (in German)
Founding Day Service, 26 June in Bentleigh, Theo Richter
Service in Bayswater 5 June, Mark Herrmann
Saal Service Bentleigh 22 May, Rolf Beilharz
Mother's Day Service Bayswater, Renate Beilharz
Saal Service in Bentleigh, Peter Lange
Andacht im Altersheim 17 April, Peter Lange (in German)
Service in Bayswater 10 April, Peter Uhlherr
Easter Service in Bentleigh 27 March, Alfred Klink
Good Friday Service in Bayswater 25 March, Theo Richter
CV Service in Rupanyup 6.March, Christa Ligham
Saal im Altersheim 20 Februar, Hermann Uhlherr  (in German)
Gippsland Meeting 6 February, Theo Richter
Evensong 30 January, Harald Ruff

end
 


 

SAAL Bentleigh: 31-12-2005. New Years Eve
Elder: Rolf Beilharz Music: Elisabeth Wagner

Welcome to the last service for the year in the TSA. Thank you for coming. I hope to give you a little bit of thought before you go on to celebrate the coming of the new year 2006.

Let’s begin the service by singing hymn Nr. 75 in our hymn book: ‘Nun danket alle Gott’, a hymn of thanks to God the creator of the universe and the life on our earth. We’ll sing the first two verses, in English or in German as you prefer.

Sing hymn

New Years eve is a good opportunity to review what has happened in the year just about to end and to think about what is likely to happen in the year starting at midnight. We can do this each for our individual selves, or for our family and, in our case this evening, for the whole Templer community. It has certainly been an important year for the Temple Society and it is worth reviewing what we achieved. It is also important that we should give some thought to the possibilities now opening up for the Temple Society. I will do both, review the achievements of the year and then speculate on future possibilities. But first we’ll complete two traditional items we all expect to find in the new-year’s eve service. These are the biblical text and remembering the members and friends who died during the year 2005.

Our text for today is Psalm 90, the verses 1 to 12: Read the text.

Here we have a description from a long time ago in Jewish history. It describes the all-powerful nature of God, the creator, before whom we humans are quite helpless on occasions when certain natural events occur, like the tsunami one year ago. Fortunately such major events, which also include earthquakes and lightning strikes killing people, are not frequent. But when they do catch us we are powerless against them. Some verses indicate that the Jews thought of God as being angry, repaying persons’s bad deeds by striking them down. Clearly, such a picture of God punishing humans for their individual bad behaviour has been part of how people have understood God until quite recently. We Templers see in the teachings of Jesus that God can also be understood as a loving father, whose goal is to make human life pleasant on our earth, just as a human father tries to do for his children in his family situation. Templer religion essentially is to help the creator in the vision that the world can be better by treating others as well as we want to be treated by others. Mainstream Christianity has chosen a different view about the teacher Jesus of Nazareth. It understands the death of Jesus, the Christ, as God’s sacrifice of his unique, innocent son, so that the sins of those who believe this Christian dogma are freed from their sins. Christian dogma also includes that Jesus Christ will return to earth to set up the 1000-year kingdom of God on earth. We could spend many hours debating about the details of how humans understand God, and what is important in religion. That is not my purpose today.

But, I do like the conclusion we can take from the text. In our part of God’s universe, on our earth, nature is unpredictable and may destroy much life, including many innocent humans. God has given us this earth to live on. On the whole, we would much rather be alive than dead. So we should be grateful to God. And in the knowledge that we could at any moment lose our life, we should become wise. We should live usefully in the time given to us. And that means the present, now! From our Templer perspective we can add that living usefully should contribute to the betterment of all of life in this world into which God has put us.

Let us now remember those of our members and friends we lost by death in the year 2005. During the year, the following Templers and friends died. If you can, please stand to remember these members and friends as I read their names. Read names (list 1).

Thank you, please be seated. In case you also want to hear about the beginning of life within the Temple Society, here is a list of babies that were born to members and friends. The list may not be complete, as we can only tell you about those births, which have been notified to us. Read names (list 2). Now I’ll review the year 2005.

What has our Temple Society achieved in Australia in the year 2005? In my view, the most significant single item is the adoption of a new constitution for the TSA at an extraordinary general meeting of members in July. To achieve this, younger Templers had worked for several years, initially clarifying what is involved in building a community. At the same time, and continuing on to the extraordinary meeting in July and beyond, a dedicated group of young members worked very hard to define a structure that should secure the future of the TSA better than our existing structure was able to do. Although the full details of the new structure are complex, the goals of the new structure, and the principles, which allow us to achieve the goals, are simple and straightforward. I was not part of the Structure committee, which did its work so well and attended to so many details. So I can only tell you how I, as an outsider, see what has happened. And the more I think about it, the more I like it.

Why did we need a change? Because the existing structure, based on geographical communities was no longer optimal for the TSA. It duplicated the same work in each community and it was getting hard to find people willing to spend time on community councils to do work for which they had little personal interest. At the same time, there was a lack of groups or individuals with responsibility for the many larger projects necessary to be done by the Regional Council and the Central Fund for all communities. This sometimes led to long delays before major decisions were made. The inefficiency of the existing structure caused members to become disgruntled and was clearly not attracting younger members of Templer families to become full members.

What were the goals?
1. To preserve unchanged the religious understanding of the Temple Society, the Templer spirit;
2. to make the TSA more attractive for new members and;
3. to make the decision-making practices and responsibilities efficient for the whole TSA without interfering with any of the existing activities.

What are the principles by which the goals were achieved?
1. Involve as many people as possible in the work of the TSA.
2. Keep the activities of the Templer Community open to people outside the TSA to help attract new members.
3. Give responsibility for decisions to the people who know about and are actively involved with individual projects.
4. Ensure that the Templer faith (our understanding of Christianity) remains true and vibrant.

And what are the results?
We have been under the new constitution for only 5 months. Even in this short time I have seen very encouraging signs that the new constitution is producing what we want to achieve. The already obvious outstanding result is that many more younger members are actively participating in the running of the TSA. During the year you members supported us in Regional Council and in the community structure committee very well by firstly, accepting the new constitution with an overwhelming majority. Secondly, in the AGA in October you elected the many members who had nominated for the positions on focus groups which coordinate the various activities of the TSA. And the members we elected included many younger Templers. One member of a focus group is from the 2002 confirmation group. You can’t get responsible decision makers much younger. The average age of decision makers is now much younger than before. The smaller Regional Council, with its ability to invite leaders of different focus groups when required, has spent far less time on general administration while devoting much more time to get to the depth of important matters. The Sydney community has decided to become a focus group in its own right. It continues to carry out all the functions that it has always done and it knows that there is help from other focus groups like the Central Fund or the property focus group for specific items. The Sydney community’s activities have recently also been pushed along by younger members. For the first time I, as head of the TSA, have begun to notice just how old I am. I now seem to be the oldest member, often by far the oldest, at Templer committee meetings I attend. While sobering for me, this is very encouraging for the future of the TSA.

Even before the July meeting, in the spirit of the coming new structure, the TSA has increasingly opened up to the Australian community. I need only mention projects or interest groups such as, in Bayswater, the group making the wall hanging for the chapel, the Heritage group and the Knox Interfaith Network; or the Glen Eyra South Ministers’ Association and the Women’s day of prayer in the Bentleigh area. The Bentleigh activities with the Ministers Association have been going for many years. As a result. we are well known to the leaders of the other Christian communities and the Jewish community in the area. We take our turn to host the Women’s day of prayer. It was wonderful, earlier this year, to see our Bentleigh Hall filled with Templers and so many non-Templers while we listened to our elders and participants from other communities, and then heard the powerful singing of the McKinnon Secondary School choir. Our recently developed habit of offering coffee and biscuits after the service provided a wonderful opportunity for Templers to mingle with the members of other churches and the singers from the McKinnon School.

In Bayswater, I thoroughly enjoy the Knox Interfaith Network. This started as a response by the Knox City Council to the events of September 11 in the USA several years ago. Its goal is to allow members of all faiths to get to know the other faiths and in this way to prevent feelings of hatred growing up between different groups. I support these aims. Because of this network we have had other faiths looking through our Chapel, and listening to what the Temple Society is and does. On several occasions I have been pleasantly surprised about how positively members of other faiths have reacted to the explanations of our religious goals and practices.

The many interest groups we have ranging from Bowling and Tennis clubs through Kids’ Club and German language schools to the Old Age care complex are giving us great opportunities to acquaint other people about our way of life. I believe this is a good basis for us to recruit new members for the Temple Society from outside and to interest the children born in Templer families to become full members.

What I have told you is just a fraction of the possibilities now available to us to let our religion grow. There are many other signs of progress. One is that we now have a bus. This allows whole groups of Templers to go to wherever they want. With the new structure in mind, it took those who knew about buses only a short time to choose and purchase the bus. You can expect other important decisions also to be made effectively and quickly. I hope that all individual members will be able to take part in Templer activities. I expect their particular wishes to be catered for if they can find other people of similar interests.

Let me now look into the future and tell you some possibilities I would like myself, or groups of Templers and friends, to follow up.

1. It is people who think. This is so obvious that you may ask: why should we want to discuss it? It becomes important when we ask the question: what is true? Because what we believe to be true is also a product of our thinking.

There are many discussion points that follow from this statement. Some may lead to better understanding, some may bridge gaps between belief systems that currently seem to be incompatible. I believe that an interest group discussing the consequences of the initial statement about people doing the thinking may have beneficial consequences.
Here are some examples.

At some time in the past, humans started to think in symbols or pictures, which they could give names to and explain to others. The bible describes this as Adam and Eve eating the fruit of knowledge of good and evil. Since that time people have wanted to understand and describe the world and the universe. In all biblical stories, the explanation of the world and what is on it is that a creator, called God, made everything. Some old Israelites who wrote the bible stories realised that the Creator is beyond our understanding. They expressed this as: people should not make images of God. This is very wise. A picture, or any other description of the creator, constrains how we understand the creator inside the boundaries implied by the picture. God is likely to be more complex than, or different from, what we have thought. I find it interesting that the big bang, with which scientists now say the universe started, presents exactly the same problem. It is impossible for us to know what caused it and what was there before it. So in this matter, old wisdom and current understanding are the same thing.

We should be able to conclude that in every period of history, people expressed what they thought in the words of their time. As time passed and the thoughts of people were written down, the later thinkers were able to use more and more accumulated information, and may therefore have come closer to how the world really is. From this point of view, can you sustain the claim that biblical stories are more true than modern science? That depends on what you think. When we accept that in every period of history people expressed their view of truth in their words and their available information, then we can conclude that so-called holy scriptures of old and science of today are really the same thing, our knowledge of what we think is true. But the truth is appropriate only in its own historical period. The truth of old holy scriptures lies not in the details of how the world works, but in its wisdom, essentially about human behaviour. That is what we can gain from reading old holy scriptures, and the Psalm we read as our text allowed us to conclude we should use constructively the time we have available while we are on earth.. We Templers, thanks to the freedom of thought that our founders have given us, can use all available information, from science and from the wisdom of holy scriptures, to help us find what we believe to be true about the world and the universe.

I find it sad that certain religious groups insist on taking particular biblical statements as ‘truth revealed by God’ and therefore, despite all the evidence, deny the facts which everyone else has accepted as true. What I can say about such people and their belief is that ‘they think that God has revealed truth to them’. That is not a strong argument to convince others that this ‘revealed truth’ must be true in fact. I just wonder whether, starting with the agreement that it is people who think and following the various consequences of this simple statement, might be a way to at least make people tolerant. It might allow everyone to accept that others, also reasonable people, may have a different belief that they accept as true. It might then become possible to overcome the problems people have with the evolution of life and their efforts to remove the teaching of it.

2. Are there too many people on earth? What are the consequences? Can one do anything about it?

I suspect that many of the ills of this world, including global warming, the more extreme weather storms we are now seeing and the increasing rate of extinction of species, follow from the effects humans and their technology are having on the world. People are unlikely to want to hear about reversing lifestyles back to past centuries. Yet, I am reminded of something Christoph Hoffmann wrote. If people cannot foresee the consequences of their actions (he was writing about things done in opposition to God’s will) then they will have to experience the consequences on their own bodies in the life they create for themselves. Perhaps we could start a discussion among conservationist, biologists, land and water users, economists and many other specialists, which clarifies the effects mankind and its technology are having and what might be done about it? A big picture discussion that combines the views of scientific specialities, together with the religious and secular values, which determine how humans live, may be useful. In a new-years eve sermon in this hall in 1999, I made the following statement: ‘It is now time that mankind, with all its modern technological and scientific means, but also with old-fashioned religious will, sets to work to counter the predictable future catastrophes in order to preserve a healthy world for all forms of life on it. This world should at the same time become the kingdom of God in which God’s justice (forgiveness and love for others as for yourself) is applied among people.’ Can we do something practical in this direction, or does this remain merely one of my many dreams?

There has been no particular wish expressed for the donations you put into the collection boxes this evening. In that case the collection passes to the Emergency fund which is available to help members in difficulties.

Before we switch our attention to the worldly festivities of seeing in the new year, we will conclude this religious service with the lord’s prayer and another hymn. For those who can rise, please stand.

Our Father in heaven,
Hallowed be Your name.
Your Kingdom come,
Your will be done on earth as in heaven.
Give us today our daily bread.
Forgive us our sins,
As we forgive those who sin against us.
Lead us when in temptation
And deliver us from evil.
For the Kingdom, the power and the Glory
Are Yours forever. Amen.

We close with the hymn Nr. 37 - ‘Großer Gott wir loben dich’. This is a hymn of thanks to God, the old-fashioned name for the giver of life. We’ll sing all 4 verses listed in the book.

Thanks to Elisabeth Wagner for the Music, the persons responsible for the flower decorations, and all of you for listening. My best wishes to you all for the year 2006, and do enjoy the party wherever you are celebrating. I also wish that you all get home safely.

return to the top

 

2005 New Year’s Eve Saal / Service in Bayswater
Elder: Alfred Klink, start 18:30
Music: Veronica Rudowicz

Hymns: 120 “Von guten Mächten...” just one verse.
71 “Mit Jubelklang stimmt an das Lied...” verses 1, 2 & 6.

When the shadows lengthen in the evening and the sun sets and darkness descends on us, when the sky opens the curtains to the cosmos and we see the stars sending their coded greetings, we may occasionally become aware of the passage of time. We human beings live consciously inside a medium called time. We experience everything in life as having a beginning and an ending. We count our age with annual birthdays, and our marriages with annual anniversaries. We evaluate history in units of time: days, years, decades and centuries. Because that is so it is inevitable that when we come to an end point of one of our measurements of time, like tonight, we pause to reflect and evaluate.
Not only do we live consciously inside that medium, we have an internal clock tuned to diurnal changes of light and darkness; a program adapted to our rhythm of working, eating and sleeping. It helps our mind and body to anticipate the environmental changes that surround us and prepare us for peak efficiency or for effective relaxation. All subconsciously. This biological clock aligns itself with the flow of time during the day, to the routines of the working week, to seasonal changes in the length of the day, temperature fluctuations during the year and the type of activity we do. We have all heard of occasions (even experienced it on our own body) where this clock came out of step with the time of day. On long aircraft flights we may become disoriented, can’t sleep, and our body clock may take days or even weeks to catch up with the new environment. If you have ever had to work shift work you will know how hard it is to switch from day shift to night shift or vise versa. We are creatures of habits, conditioned by the daily environment. We know this daily synchronising with the environment does extend to the seven day week. We all look forward to the weekend, a change of pace, a family environment for a day or so, and then on Monday start the new week with fresh enthusiasm and vigour. What I am asking now is, could this biological time-keeping extend over the period of a year? Does our body-clock need an annual break? Has New Year and New Year’s Eve more than a historical significance in our lives? I would like to come back to that in a moment.

Let us now sing hymn number 120, “Von guten Mächten...” The hymn has only one verse so, that we may fit the words to the melody properly, Veronica will first play the melody through once and you can hum along in English or German; the second time around we sing with all our heart.
 

Our text for today comes from the book of psalms and is very appropriate for today’s reflection on the passage of time – Psalm 90, a prayer of Moses. I have selected from the verses 1 - 12. “...O Lord, even before the mountains were brought forth and you formed the Earth and the world, you are God. A thousand years in your sight are as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night...They are like the grass that sprouts up in the morning and in the evening it is cut down....The years of our lives are threescore and ten; and if by reason of strength they are fourscore, their pride is labour and sorrow for we are soon cut off and fly away. Teach us, o Lord, to number our days, that we may apply our hearts to wisdom”.

The lovely story of creation in the Book of Genesis has divided our lives into seven-day cycles from time immemorial. God set the scene, as He worked the first day between evening and morning, reflected on his work and pronounced it good. – Theologians still argue about whether God created the world ex nihilo, out of nothing; that is to say there was no matter, no space or time before. The Hebrew text leaves that open. The author’s account though does resemble other ancient creation stories -- for example, the Babylonian and Greek. In both these pagan tales the orderly universe is wrested from primeval chaos of darkness and disorganized matter ("chaos" is in fact the Greek term). – God worked the second and the third day to finish the major construction work, and then on the fourth, fifth and sixth day he attended to fitting it out and bringing life into it. In today’s computer language we would allocate three days to construct the hardware and three days to design the necessary software to run it. That done God took a rest. Why would the author of the Book of Genesis have felt the need to give God a day of rest? – By the way have you ever wondered about the quaint sounding definition of a day in Genesis? It does not say from morning to evening, but very specifically it says, from evening to morning. This is worth a moment’s reflection. Imagine you had none of the trimmings of modern civilisation, how would you tell the time of the day? By the rising sun of course, you say. But the sun rises (or sets) at different times during the year. At what time would you then say one day finished and the next day started? There is one obvious moment in the daily cycle that never varies – when the sun is at its highest point in the sky it is 12 o’clock. And in the days the Bible was written that was the only reliable reference point, readily available to everyone. That’s why they started each day at 12 noon, not at midnight as we do now, and it lasted from midday to midday. The time from noon to noon was then divided into a convenient number of hours, or buckets of water or whatever mechanical devices they used to measure the time periods for regulating their daily activities. God’s day of rest would have been from noon on Saturday to noon on Sunday.

Let’s go back a step. Why was it necessary to give God a day of rest? Or, turning it around the other way, why did God deem it proper to insert a rest-day at all, and why after six working days. Why not five, or seven or 10? It appears that at the time the book was written the need of people for a break in routine work was already well known to the Hebrew. And why seven days? History shows that despite serious attempts to introduce a working “week” of different lengths none of the alternatives ever took on. The ancient Egyptians are known to have used a 10 day week, as did the French after the revolution in 1793. The French also, in a fit of metrication madness, divided the day into ten hours consisting of 100 minutes of 100 seconds each. It was short lived; Napoleon abolished it again in 1806. The seven day week probably originated in Babylon or Persia and proved definitely the most popular and enduring system. It was already known in Rome long before Christianity came on the scene. Why seven? There are many theories for the magic of seven. For example, if you wrap a rubber band around seven circular objects you get a perfect hexagon with the 7th in the middle. It is the only stable configuration of wrapping more than 3 circular objects. Another viable theory correlates the seven day week to the seven (astrological) "planets" known to the ancients: Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, and Saturn, which seems to be confirmed by the similarity of their names. But I feel there must be more to the seven day week than just religious or astrological motivation. It must have something to do with our human make-up. We are not machines. When organised labour became part of community life, introduction of an occasional chance for reflection became essential. Apart from a belief in a higher order of things we humans have a need to see an end to what we are doing, a break, an opportunity to talk to people, refocus our attention away from the mundane to something new, something different. Perhaps concentrating on the one chore for six days is the break-even point in our brain. After that you start to loose concentration, your mind wanders, you start making mistakes and have accidents. It is a psychological effect that some compare to a battery running down and needing recharging.
 

Do we also posses such a feeling for the annual cycle? Is there more to New Year’s Eve and Happy New Year than eat and drink and make merry? Do we have a psychological need to put a line under the completed year, make a balance of debit and credit? add up our emotional Soll und Haben? Do we see it as an opportunity for a fresh start? Another New Year’s Resolution, like: do more exercise, stick to the latest diet, go to Saal regularly, write more letters, say Hello to more people, wash the car each week, talk to the neighbours, invite our friends for dinner, or perhaps take that overdue overseas trip? – On New Year’s Eve it is open season on wishes. It is Christmas all over, even better, for the promises you give on New Year’s Eve you get to keep yourself; the Credit Card on emotions has no limits. – Why shouldn’t humans have an inbuilt annual clock? We know that plants have it, they know when to sprout, when to flower, when to let the fruit ripen and when to let their leafs fall. Animals have it, the birds and the bees have it. Why not us? Just because we have eaten from the tree of knowledge, must our consciousness override all our instincts? Today society can foretell the tides and count the seasons, we measure the years by the politicians, the decades by the wars waged, the centuries by technology, the millennia by the dominating religion and the ages by the material used for the construction of tools. Excitement builds as we count down the seconds towards midnight: ten, nine, eight, seven, six, five, four, three, two, one – Happy New Year! We have done it! Actually to be correct this year you will have to count ...three, two, one, one – Happy new Year! For science, in its never-ending quest for greater and greater accuracy will this year again add a leap second on New Years Eve at midnight. Our Earth is slowing down and our days are getting longer. Since 1967, when it was decided to tie the length of the standard second to atomic time rather than to the solar day, 25 such leap seconds have had to be added.
Numbering our days, fixing the exact end of one year and the start of a new year has always been important to man for a variety of reasons, not the least of which was religion and the timing of Easter. Early civilisations used the heliacal (meaning near the sun) first rising of a bright star after its conjunction with the sun. The Sothic year of the Egyptians is determined by the rising of Sothis (the Egyptian name for the Dog Star, Sirius), which also heralds the flooding of the Nile. Massive and elaborate monuments, circles of stone like Stonehenge, are believed to have been dedicated to such quests. The Romans first used the Vernal Equinox, the time when the sun’s path through the sky starts to cross the Equator. Vernal means ‘in Spring’ and Equinox equal night. Remember the soothsayer’s warning to Julius Caesar? ‘beware the Ides of March’? That used to be the start of their year. The early Roman calendar had only ten months and started the year in March, which is still reflected in the names of some months derived from Roman numerals: September (Seventh), October (Eighth), November (Ninth), December (Tenth). Around 115 BC the months of January and February were added to the end of the year. But because consuls were chosen in January, and because years were named after the consuls who served in that year, January became the de facto beginning of the year, until in 45 BC Julius Caesar introduced the Julian calendar, officially decreeing that the New Year should start on 1 January.
When we thus reflect on the nature of our guidelines, we recognise how much the apparent order of modern civilisation depends on how we structure science and technology, and how much our decisions for the coming year are based on our trust in the value of the system. We realise that our wishes for the customary health and happiness and peace on Earth will always be a compromise with reality. Jesus is quoted as having said: "In this world you will have tribulation." The peace he promised was, in his words, "not as the world gives." When in the Fourth Gospel he is asked whether either the blind man or his parents were guilty of causing his blindness, he said that this is not how the world operates. It is our belief and our capacity for hope that gives us the courage to live in this evolving and transitory world without despair. Our job is to make this world into a more user-friendly place where ever we can, and to accept as reality that which what we cannot change.

A sad reminder of the “three-score and ten” transitory nature of our existence on this Earth is the list of 12 Members and Friends who passed away during the year 2005. Would those of you who can please stand in honour of their memory while I read out their names:
*Luise Imberger, Agnes Stütz, *Theodor Doh, *Luise Wied, Paul Rubitschung, *Nella Weller, *Annemarie Kirchner, *Else Hermann, Manfred Unger, *Hildegard Turnevicius, *Agnes Lämmle, *Elly Steller and, I have just been told, Briar Hornung.
Having passed our way on their journey through God’s enigmatic kingdom here on Earth they, in passing, have left this world a better place. We extend our sincere condolences to the families. –
Please be seated

On a happier note we take pleasure in announcing 12 Babies born to Members and Friends during the year:
Jaqui Evelyn Katz, *Mia Johanna Christine Hoefer, Tate Rodi Schwarzbauer, Riley James Löbert,
Liam Alexander Arndt, Natalie Loren Scheerle, Aida Ellen Arndt McCoid, Owen Hugh Spieth,
Rachel Susanne Glover, Benjamin Kurt Spieth, *Ellena Lauren Glenk, Benjamin Nikolai Arndt.
We congratulate the happy couples and wish the babies and their parents (and their grandparents) health and happiness in all the years to come.
Health and happiness to you all, as we now look forward to the new year with anticipation. Tonight we turn over the page in our book of life on 2005 and let the blank pages of 2006 tempt us to write of our hopes and aspirations for the next 12 months. Tomorrow the curtain will rise on a brand new day, of a brand new year and a brand new adventure. “The darkness cedes, the night retreats, the glorious sun has risen...”
Let us greet the new year, the start of summer and the new generation as we sing together the song of joy and the glory of God, hymn number 71: “mit Jubelklang stimmt an das Lied...” , verses 1, 2 & 6.

I received a lovely Christmas Card from an overseas friend with a little story called The Four Candles. In closing let me just tell you about it. In the story you have a dream that there are four candles within you. When they are all alight they make your eyes shine, your face radiant and you are a nice person. Each candle is sustained by one of your emotions. The first candle is called Peace. One day you felt angry about all the strife in the world and the candle became sad and went out. The second candle is called Trust. It went out when a friend disappointed you. The third candle is called Love, but it could not find reciprocate love and went out. There was only one candle left, you had lost your energy, your confidence and your vitality. Then a young child came along. It saw the cold candles and asked them, why are you three candle out. Each of them told their sad story. Then the child asked the last candle ‘what is your name?’ Hope, the candle said. ‘You look wonderful’, said the young child. ‘I’ll just take your light and with it light up all the others’. No sooner said than done, with the candle Hope it lit up Peace, Trust and Love. The four of them filled you with a warm glow that made your eyes shine again and your face radiant.
The moral of the story? Es irrt der Mensch so lang er strebt, doch hoffet er, solang er lebt. As long as you have hope all the other emotions can be rekindled. Any child knows that.

If I appear to mix science, religion and philosophy in my Saals at random, it is with a genuine belief that this is the way modern society becomes aware of the benefits that can arise from participating in religious groups. While we humans have an inbuilt need to believe, that belief is effective only if you are able to share it with others. It has to be believable. The Templer religious philosophy, to be seen as an attractive way of life by others, needs to prove itself laterally, beyond our community. This it can only do through science. Religion to me is part of science. It can no longer be seen as a subject detached from everyday life and the living. It is part of the wider field of philosophy, the love of wisdom. Teach us, O Lord, to number our days, that we may apply our hearts to wisdom.

 == Music ==

Thank you, Veronica, for the music, thanks to the unseen hands that arranged the friendly flowers and thank you all for making this evening here in this temple a pleasure. I wish you a happy and safe New Year holiday. May 2006 be a prosperous year for you and your families; a peaceful year full of trusting friends and loving happiness and, most of all, a healthy dose of hope. 

Return to the top

 

Sunday Service in Bentleigh, 27 November

Elder: Theo Richter

Good morning to you all and welcome to our service here in Bentleigh.

I really love this time of the year.  The whole atmosphere is still charged with the freshness and beauty of spring, but the days are getting warmer with every now and then, a hot one to remind us that summer is just around the corner.  Our noses, if not encumbered by hay fever, are assailed by a host of sensory delights as we move around – the rich smell of fresh cut grass, the delicate fragrance of flowers in bloom, the distinct smells of eucalypt and ti-tree.

As you can probably tell, I’ve just come back from a day mowing the lawn at our holiday house at Tootgarook – the blend of warm weather, freshly mown lawns and the sea breeze is one that I delight in every time I’m down there.  More importantly, the time spent there gives me the ability to reassess where things are at and gives me the chance to digest the many happenings that surround our lives at the moment.

As was the case last Thursday, every now and then we get a humid day, followed by a thunderstorm.  The sharp crack of thunder and lightning as it goes off overhead - flashes lighting up the ominous dark clouds in the sky, and the rattle of the window panes as the sound of distant thunder rumbles into silence.

These are my signs that summer is around the corner and that Christmas will soon be upon us.  And in that vein, I wonder what Christmas will bring us this year?  I’m sure for all of us living in Melbourne, it’s not a question of how we shall celebrate because our family traditions go on with little change from year to year, but rather, the main question is usually, “What will the weather be like?”

Will it be a cold and rainy one, where we can celebrate in the warmth of our richly decorated houses, sitting amongst our family and friends with windows tight shut and heaters on full blast?

Will it be the perfect day – sunny, 23 degrees with a light breeze just strong enough to keep the heat off without being annoying, where the best possible end to the day is Christmas Eve and you genuinely can’t wait till nightfall to start the festivities?

Will it be a hot and sultry one, where the hot north wind blows all day and gathers up a menacing thunderstorm that unloads its anger just as we’ve lit the candles and want to start singing carols – the large drops of rain falling in fat crescendos of water, literally wave after wave - drowning out our voices and exposing all the tiniest leaks in the roof?

Or will it be a Christmas celebrated at the end of a long hot day, where the temperature has broken through the forties and everything, including the candle bedecked tree, is hanging in limp aridity, hardly able to wait for the sun to set and bring on the blessed relief from the scorching sun, only to be thwarted and dealt the double blow of a night spent tossing on the bed being smothered by 30+ degree temperatures.

I think it’s actually quite wonderful to think that we in Melbourne actually experience this varying weather and can remember a time in our lives when most of , if not two or three at the same time, of the aforementioned Christmases took place.  It certainly adds an extra dimension to our experience of this wonderful time.

In the spirit of this feeling, I thought we could open our service with Hymn number 17 – ‘Brüder, singt ein Lied der Freude’ – ‘Come, sing a song of joy’, which is sung to the melody of ‘Ode to Joy’ by Beethoven.  We will sing verses one, two and three.  Please feel free to sing in either German or English

Our hymn provides us with powerful yet simple words of praise and hope for mankind.  In it we find the twin emotions of joy and love – emotions that reside in our existence when we embrace a life devoted to and inspired by Gods leadership, guidance and love.  And it is through his love, that we are able to know love.  By knowing love, we are able to show love. And through showing love, we are able to overcome the many barriers that cause the pain of misunderstanding – not only for ourselves, but for our fellow mankind.

Our text today is taken from John 8: verses 14 – 18 and it reads thus:

Then, midway through the festival, Jesus went up to the Temple and preached openly.  The Jewish leaders were surprised when they heard him.  “How can he know so much when he’s never been to our schools?” they asked.

So Jesus told them, “I’m not teaching you my own thoughts, but those of God who sent me.  If any of you really determines to do God’s will, then you will certainly know whether my teaching is from God or is merely my own.  Anyone presenting his own ideas is looking for praise for himself, but anyone seeking to honour the one sent him is a good and true person.”

Our text deals with that time in Jesus’ life known as the Galilean ministry.  He travels throughout Galilee preaching the word of God, healing and teaching all who choose to come and listen.  His ministry is punctuated by the many healings and miracles that he used to demonstrate that he was the son of God.

At the time of this text, the Jewish people were celebrating one of their annual festivals – the Tabernacle Ceremonies.  The main festivities are to take place in Judea in Jerusalem at the Temple and Jesus is urged by his brothers to attend so that his works and his fame should gain a greater audience.  Jesus, however, is uncertain if he should go because he believes it is too early in his ministry and that he has already attracted the undue attention of the Jewish leaders and believes they are plotting against him.

So he stays back and only in the very last moment, decides he will go.  In so doing, he travels secretly and plans to stay out of the public eye and not attract any undue attention.  His hesitation was not misguided – during the whole of the festivities the Jewish leaders were in fact searching for him, asking all and sundry if they had seen or heard of this mysterious Jesus.  Adding fuel to their fire, the Jewish leaders over heard the discussion about him in the crowd.  Everyone had a story to tell and the crowd was split in their opinion of him – there were definitely a group who saw him as a wonderful person and others who saw him as a fake and there were many there who could be swayed to support him.

Given his indecision prior to this trip to Jerusalem, and his apparent desire to remain off the Jewish leaders’ radar as much as possible, it is a conundrum when we then read that after a few days in Jerusalem, Jesus chose to make himself known, and in such a public manner as to preach before the Temple.  Although the text doesn’t actually say so, perhaps we can deduce that, having not revealed himself to the crowd, Jesus was able to listen to their talk and deduce that he had more support than he had previously imagined and that a declaration of his presence would benefit the aims of his mission.

We can reasonably support this assumption with some degree of confidence as is evidenced in a later passage of text:

‘Then the Jewish leaders sought to arrest him, but no hand was laid upon him, for Gods time had not yet come. Many among the crowds at the Temple believed in him.  “After all,” they said, “what miracles do you expect the Messiah to do that this man hasn’t done?”’

Jesus faced a fickle audience – one that could be swayed by popular opinion and he clearly saw that the way to their heart lay in satisfying their external, worldly interests, not just by appealing to their spiritual minds.  Jesus realised this very early in his ministry and although he was prepared to play to this requirement, he never lost sight of his purpose – to win their hearts and minds for God's purpose.

In a previous text, whilst preaching to the masses on the shores of Lake Galilee, Jesus said to them, ‘But you shouldn’t be so concerned about perishable things like food. No, spend your energy seeking the eternal life that I, the Messiah, can give you.  For God has sent me for this very purpose’

Although his previous hesitation to declare himself shows a certain lack of confidence, we must remember that in Jesus’ time, the Pharisee’s had a vice like grip on social and spiritual life over all of biblical Israel.  They were strongly supported in this by the military might of the then occupying power - the Roman Empire.  Any insurgency was summarily and ruthlessly dealt with.  In this early part of his ministry it was critical for Jesus to know that he had the majority support from the crowd.  If he had it, he knew that any detractors would be out numbered and his could be secure in the knowledge that the sentiment of the crowd would protect him and keep him in safety and would allow him to deliver his message unimpeded.  Even then, he needed to be very careful to choose the right time and place to deliver his message from God.  The thronging masses could change very quickly - if he chose the wrong place and a more right wing crowd, he could just as easily have been set upon as a usurper and been handed over to the Pharisee’s to be dealt with as they saw fit.

And we must remember that part of God’s plan for Jesus was that he should be the catalyst that broke the hold the Pharisee’s had over the spiritual wellbeing of the common population.  Jesus was sent to re-establish direct channels of communion with God, rather than that communion being controlled, as it was, by the organised religious establishment.  This put him at odds with the establishment and, by way of their organised power base; they were in the perfect position to deflect his challenge to their authority.  Jesus, especially at this time of his Ministry, was very much the upstart challenger to the established order.

That Jesus was successful in his mission is not in doubt – we, as an assembly of Christian believers, are the end product of his success.

I wonder if any of you has read a very interesting article in The Age on Saturday 12th November 2005 as part of the feature article The Saturday Essay and titled ‘Does Jesus have a Future?’  Written by Archbishop Peter Jensen, it is prefaced by the opening commentary ‘Christ is slipping out of memory and imagination, but replacing him with myths such as Eureka is not enough to sustain our values in difficult times.’  I will read directly from the article.

I’ve spent most of my life talking to Australians about Jesus.  He is my great enthusiasm.  But it’s a job that’s getting harder.  I am wondering how the future of our country will intersect.  Let me illustrate.

Four of our brightest and best university medallists, historians, lawyers, Harvard graduates and first-class honours men have written a book called Imagining Australia: Ideas for our Future.  It is a work of bold and imaginative suggestions.  Rightly, they put a discussion of Australian values in the first chapter, headed” Australian National Identity”.  After all, it’s hard to imagine the future without starting with matters of belief, identity, ethics, relationships and history.

But they do not have much room for Jesus in their vision of our future.  They see that we need values, but they favour humanist values.  They seem to think that a secular state means a secular community.

Perhaps they think that multiculturalism has disaffiliated Jesus; he is too divisive to be allowed to speak.  I wonder though, how much they actually know about Jesus.  Perhaps they lack the requisite knowledge to bring him into the discussion.  For example, they casually quote Abraham Lincoln as an authority; Lincoln saying that a house divided against itself cannot stand.

No doubt he did say this.  But he knew quite well, as did all his hearers, that he was quoting Jesus.  He was citing a supreme cultural authority; he did not have to offer a footnote.  But we have now reached a stage where four highly educated and intelligent Australians apparently fail to recognise a standard quote from the Bible.  It explains, I suppose, the absence of Jesus from their treatment of values.

Mind you, it is a surface absence, because, whether they know it or not, Jesus is basic to our history, and so our culture.  Thus, when they are trying to upgrade traditional Australian characteristics, such as a fair go, Jesus pops up, anonymously.  In a truly striking sentence, they say: “The modern fair go demands that we do unto others as we would have done unto ourselves.”

Jesus is there, but he has been rendered invisible.  He is the anonymous Jesus: he makes his contribution without acknowledgement.

Frankly, Jesus is slipping out of memory and imagination.  We cannot really blame the authors of the book.

I thought this a startling commentary on where the mission that Jesus founded sat in the modern psyche.  It leads one to think around our ability to assimilate knowledge and interpret information.  And it begs the question, “Has our modern age swallowed up the source of original thought and is it producing a society based on one size fits all?”

In asking this question, I am thinking specifically of the Information Age and the way that current society trades in it.  One of the most substantial changes that has beset society is the internet.  By typing a simple lookup request on almost any topic, you can usually receive an answer that satisfies the request.  Information is at the ready - it is available and it can be gotten now.  There is no question in my mind, it is a wonderful medium, but it has its flaws and the ‘buyer must beware’.  One of its drawbacks is that we need to be careful that the information is reliable.  It is difficult in many cases to substantiate the source of the information that your search engine retrieves.  And because of this difficulty, you often need to roughly know whether the answer you get fits in with what you expected.  It’s a bit like in maths – you need a ballpark idea of what the answer will be to be able to know that the answer you got is right.  Simplified, despite what your calculator says, 0.1 x 10 cannot equal 10, and you must have some inkling of the magnitude of the answer to know this and be able to realise that you made a keying error.

Contrast this with even 20 years ago and it was a totally different situation.  You either bought the relevant reference book, or you went to the library to borrow one.  Either way, you could substantiate your source of information very easily because the tomes of reference were valid and verifiable.  Thus, in this pre-internet age, you knew that a quote that came from a different source had to be acknowledged in the form of a footnote or a reference in the bibliography.  The rules of publishing dictated that this would be so in every case.

The point that Archbishop Jensen makes in his article in The Age is that no-one seems to know that these saying come from the bible and that they can be directly attributed to Jesus.  And the reason why this is so, is that the rules that used to ensure that information is valid and verifiable have been weakened through such media as the internet.  Information is traded so prolifically in our current society that the veritable footnote or bibliography is often missing, resulting in the inevitable issue where ‘quotes are unwittingly being misquoted’.  And thus, Abraham Lincoln is attributed with the quote and Jesus doesn’t get a mention.

The article goes on to discuss the relative place that Jesus – in fact all of Christianity - has played in the history of modern Australia and that it is difficult to separate these two components. And it further supposes that the view presented by the four academics in their work Imagining Australia: Ideas for our Future firstly precludes the contribution made by Jesus/Christianity and secondly, negates any possible future contribution based on the surmise that a multicultural society is by its very nature a secular one.

As I read the article, I kept getting mental prompts that made me think about the role I felt religion played in our society today.  And it reminded me of a conversation I had several years ago on exactly that topic.  In that conversation, the discussion had divided into two camps with each side trying to represent their respective points of view.

At some stage, the comment was made that our entire social system was founded on the basic tenets observed in the Ten Commandments.  This statement was met with complete incredulity – it had never occurred to the others that a set of statements made over 3000 years ago could possibly be the founding stone of society as we know it.  The discussion waned very quickly after that as the light of realisation dawned.

And in that context, I wonder if the omission of Jesus/Christianity is in itself intentional, or is it simply the result of the authors assuming that religion will play a role irrespective of the changes that may come in the future society.

One of the greatest factors supporting this assumption is in this gathering here today.  We are members of the Christian faith and form a subgroup in Australian society called the Temple Society.  There are many other subgroups of religions, be they Christian, Muslim, Hindu or any other, and in almost all instances, each subgroup can be loosely tied to an ethic subgroup.  Together, we exist in our current society in peaceful coexistence.  We all form what the authors call the multicultural Australian society.  An in this point, we support the theory that religions will continue to coexist as long as tolerance and understanding exist.

And in that statement, I feel that we as members of that future society can answer the question posed by Archbishop Jensen – Does Jesus have a future? And the answer is unabashedly “Yes!”

And in that affirmation, we echo the spirit that was embodied in the man we call Jesus.  At the start of this service, we heard in our text of Jesus in the Temple of Jerusalem, delivering his message with such profound knowledge and depth of understanding that the Jewish leaders were forced to admire his unschooled ability. 

Jesus had that charisma, the ability to draw people together with his simple message - love one another, and above all, love your God.  People tried to touch him, to experience that power that emanated from him, because it did not just bring physical healing, it brought spiritual healing as well.  His bread was not food for the body, but rather nourishment for the spirit and that is what drew them to him.  For a people long starved of spiritual guidance, blocked from its essence by leaders who spoke only of ritual and tradition, his was a welcome message.

For each of us, removed by so many generations, the message Jesus spoke still carries the same power.  We sit here today, drawn by the same bond - the knowledge that we can all help each other to find our own place in Gods Kingdom.  It doesn’t matter our persuasion, it doesn’t matter our individual belief.  What counts is that we can draw from our mutual understanding of how things are, and can build on our own experience by sharing in the group experience that makes up the whole that is Gods understanding.

The passing of time has perhaps softened the need to blatantly and openly challenge what in Jesus’ days was the closed attitude of the Church.  We are able to choose our belief and have at our fingers a broad spectrum of religions that allow us to worship him.  We are doubly blessed to know that through Jesus’ death, the physical barrier between man and God has been destroyed forever, to be replaced by a direct path to his ear through worship and prayer.

What is our challenge is to unhinge ourselves from the frantically paced, material attitude of our modern world, and to re-establish within our own psyche, the harmonic balance that comes with a spirit in tune with God, nature and other men.

It is so easy to become self-centred and vain in our attitude toward Holy Communion.  The attitude of our day has seen a turn from ‘us’ to ‘I’, with a great deal of attention devoted to the expression and finding of self.  Therein lies a dangerous path in that we may become ‘experts’, the definition being “one who knows more and more about less and less to the point where one knows absolutely everything about nothing at all.”  Similarly, if we seek ourselves too effectively, we risk knowing everything about our self and stand lonely in a world that has passed us by, unknown.  As with all terms of expression, balance is the key.  To understand oneself is a blessing, but not at the cost of excluding all else.

Our challenge is to open our hearts, not only to ourselves, but to all mankind.  We must seek our own self, we must search to expand our horizons - these are positives in the development of our spirit, but, in doing so, we need to accept and actively participate in the greater community around us.  After family and friends, our next closest kin is our community.  We are truly fortunate that we can count on its support in times of doubt and trouble, its ability to provide friendship and acquaintance, its ability to share the load.  In turn, we owe it the debt of our support, of our input and of our endless love.  Just as we turn to it to reap its benefit, so it turns to us to provide its longevity.

Despite the small size of our Templar community, it bodes well that we can call on the substance of our earlier acquaintances, of times shared together, of common knowledge and belief, these elements enabling us to come together today so that we may share our thoughts, feed our souls, and enjoy ourselves in our community.  Truly we are blessed in our common worship.

It would be wonderful if we could join together in a quiet prayer.  Please be upstanding if you are able and join with me now as we recite the Lord’s Prayer
Our Father in heaven,
Hallowed be Your name,
Your Kingdom come,
Your will be done on earth as in heaven.
Give us today our daily bread.
Forgive us our sins,
As we forgive those who sin against us.
Lead us when in temptation and deliver us from evil.
For the Kingdom, the power and the glory
Are Yours forever.
Amen.

To close our service, I thought we could sing Hymn number 21 – ‘Danke fur diesen guten Morgen’ – ‘Thank you for giving me the morning’.  We will sing verses one, two and six.

I thank you for taking the time to come today and to join us in this service.  In closing, I would like to wish you all a very enjoyable afternoon amongst family and friends and wish you a safe journey home.

Thank you for listening

Return to the top

 

Sunday Service in Bentleigh, 30 October
Elder, Alfred Klink

Musik, Elisabeth Wagner
Hymn: No 39 “Harre meine Seele...” both verses
Hymn: No 42 “Herr dir ist niemand zu vergleichen...” also both verses.

When I send out the latest TSA on-line message about the partial Lunar Eclipse on 17 October it occurred to me how the interplay of light and shadow accompanies us throughout our life and provides the contrasts that balances our needs. The beauty of the night sky lies in the contrast between silvery-soft light of the Moon, the silken blackness of infinity and the brilliance of the twinkling stars. You do not see this during daytime, because when the transparent air above us is hit by the fiery light from the sun the air changes into a blue curtain that hides the stars from our sight. The Moon can sometimes be seen during the daytime too, but its hardly worth a second look then. Light needs darkness to be appreciated. Even the warm glow of a candle loses its mystique in the brightness of day.

The shadow of the Earth touching the full Moon reminded me how important darkness can be in our lives, how most things only become visible or recognisable in the proper balance of light and shadow; how much information is there for the taking in the shading. The shadow of the Earth on the Moon proves that Sun, Earth and Moon are all in line and that the Sun, even when we do not see it anymore above us, is still shining brightly, for we can see the long shadow it casts into the cosmic depth.
I would like to talk today about our need for light and shadow, not only in physical events as in astronomy, but also in our daily life, where its symbolic equivalents, joy and sorrow, are also an essential necessity to social harmony. It is in this balance of light and shadow that I see the message of the story of Hiob, our text for today.
To begin let us sing hymn number 39, Harre, meine Seele ... both verses.
This is a lovely old hymn; in style and in sentiment it matches the text for today, which comes from the last chapter, nearly at the end of the Book of Job in the Old Testament: Job shows humility and his prayer is answered, chapter 42 verses 1 to 6.

1 Then Job answered the LORD:
2 "I know that you can do all things, and that no purpose of yours can be thwarted.
3 'Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge? 'Therefore I have uttered what I did not understand, things too wonderful for me, which I did not know.
4 'Hear, and I will speak; I will question you, and you declare to me.'
5 I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you;
6 therefore I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes."

Let me sketch out the background to this passage a bit to put the text in perspective. The book of Job is an wonderful and yet chilling account of one man's struggle to discover a meaning for God. After being forced to suffer everything imaginable Job argues with God that he does not, and did not, deserve to be treated the way God has treated him. God's persuasive counter argument is that Job does not have sufficient knowledge to know what is right or wrong from God's point of view. Then Job shows humility with the answer above.
The Book of Job is one long poem. It symbolically discusses the age-old paradox why good and innocent people also have to suffer. The enigma of the suffering of the righteous and the good fortune of the wicked was been often addressed by Israelite literature, both in the psalms and in other wisdom texts. Although not prominent in the book of Proverbs, it emerges more strongly in the later wisdom books of Ecclesiastes and Sirach. Several Psalms also address aspects of these issues (Ps 37; 39; 49; 73), but they do not exhibit the radical protest and questioning that one finds in the book of Job.
Senseless suffering can be one of the hardest problem to understand. It is a puzzle in our traditional world philosophy of cause and effect. The first reaction when a calamity befalls us is usually, what have I done wrong to deserve this! Job had an awful problem. Is not pain and suffering a punishment for some transgression? Reserved for transgressors? But Job was a good man. (He is in fact the only person in the Old Testament whose goodness is never in doubt). Yet he lost all his possessions. Job's children died. Job became so ill that he wanted to die. His three friends argue that Job's misfortunes were proof that he had committed some sins for which he was being punished. His friends also advanced the converse position that good fortune is always a divine reward, and that if Job would renounce his supposed sins, he would immediately experience the return of good fortune. In response, Job asserted that he was a righteous man, and that his misfortune was therefore not a punishment for anything. This raised the possibility that God acts in capricious ways, and Job's wife urged him to curse God, and die. Instead, Job responded with equanimity: "The Lord gives, and the Lord takes away; blessed be the name of the Lord." The climax of the book occurs when God responds to Job, not with an explanation for Job's suffering but rather with a question: Where were you when I created the world? This response may be read in a variety of ways. Some see it as an attempt to humble Job. Yet the fact that Job, in his reply to the Lord quoted above, seems so comforted by God's appearance, and the fact that he 'saw God and lived', suggest that the author of the book was more concerned with whether or not God is present in people's lives, than with the question of whether or not God is just.

We, with the advantage of having seen the prologue in heaven where the plot to put Job to the test was hatched (to which Job was of course not part), we see (I see) a form of God imbued with human emotions, a God who has a need to be loved, who can be challenged at any moment to proof the faith of his subjects with elaborate schemes of punishment. The appended conclusion to the book (some say it is not part of the original story) has God restoring Job to wealth, granting him new children, and possibly restoring his health, although this is not implied or explicitly stated, and suggests that the faith of the righteous is indeed rewarded. But there is something that we must understand; while the Book of Job does not give easy, clear answers to this eternal question it shows the problem in a symbolic way as it really is. It gives an honest record of the sufferer’s doubts; it shows that suffering is not necessarily a punishment for sin (although Job has on occasion been accused by critics of complacency and materialism); it suggests what our attitude to trouble and pain should be. It is an attempt to confuse the question, "Is misfortune always a divine punishment for something someone has done?"

There is a deeper challenge for us today hidden in the story of Job. With our unique human ability to put ourselves in someone else’s shoes, so to speak, we tend to assess and compare other people with ourselves. Not only that, we endow the creatures on this Earth, yes, even God in heaven, with our emotions, with our capacity to feel joy and sadness, compassion for pain and suffering, and to rejoice in the triumph of good over evil. We tend to forget that all of these emotions are part of the environment we ourselves live in. They are not universal; they are tools we humans became equipped with by evolution, as are the eyes in our head and muscles of our body. They are not God-given for our enjoyment as and when we please. Just as working, walking, running, swimming or speaking need constant practice to become good at, the extra-sensory feelings and emotions within us need practice too. Without balanced exercises they will dry out, shrivel up and become useless. We have a “need” for emotional pain and sorrow to challenge apathy and bring out the will to overcome adversity. Call it part of our survival instinct; an instinct that tries to match our human nature to the nature of the environment so we can be supported by it. Just as a balance of light and shade are needed for life to flourish, so a measure of joy and sorrow is essential for our mind to develop greater understanding. I remember an old German proverb here warning against overindulgence of any sort: “Nichts is schlechter zu ertragen als eine Reihe von guten Tagen”, which roughly translated says “nothing is worse for you than too many good days”. Did Job learn from his experience?

As I said before, the Book of Job is a poem; not a poem in the modern sense of rhyme and poetic metre, but in a lyrical way, like the Song of Solomon for instance. With a mixture of prose and verse it is counted as one of the five creative books in the Old Testament, and by some is seen as the most difficult book of the Bible to fathom. The many Exegesis of the book (exegesis are studies to find the author’s intended meaning of a story) are classic attempts to reconcile the co-existence of evil and God. Job appears both as an invocation to righteousness, a cynical outlook on the idea of righteousness, and a response to the problem of evil. Scholars are divided as to what the original intent of the poem was, and a few even suggest it was meant as a satire against puritanical religion.
I see in the book, beyond its lyrical beauty, an old religion, a philosophy with a picture of a man-oriented image of God from a bygone era. An era that did not, that does not recognise the responsibility each of us has for our neighbour, for humanity and for our environment. An era where sheep, goats, camels and cows were the measure of a man’s standing in the eyes of God. It is a story that tells us much about the priorities of life and beliefs in human society as it was some three thousand years ago. A time when Plato had Socrates asking the ethical dilemma question: “Is what God commands right because He commands it, or is it right for some reason other than that it is His command?” In other words, is something right prior to God's commanding it (or wrong prior to His forbidding it) or is it neither right nor wrong unless and until God has pronounced it one or the other? Is it simply His pronouncing it right or wrong that makes it so, or (seeing that we can feel upset by God’s unfair treatment of Job) are there right and wrongs even for the gods? Is there light and darkness even in heaven?
In the beginning, when the world was without void or form, darkness reigned supreme. Then the light came, whether by God’s command “Let there be light” as the Bible says or with a “Big Bang” as the scientists say, it does not matter, an overabundance of hot light was suddenly there and, as we know, this is just as deadly to life as is frigid darkness. Life, as we know it, needs a proper balance of both, so God divided the world into light and darkness and the first day was created. Evolution took a a little bit longer to give form and void to the Earth, but the common theme for us is that without a temperature gradient from hot to cold, from light to darkness, life would not have evolved on Earth. The Book of Job is a story, not the measure of our lives. We live in a universe that has billions of stars like the sun, and may have millions of planets like the Earth, some of which may contain life as we know it, other intelligent life with their own measure of light and darkness and right and wrong. Within the last two years some 160 new planets have been discovered by astronomers in our galactic neighbourhood alone. Our world is changing before our eyes, the horizons widen with every day.
The nineteenth century English poet John Keats once bemoaned that Isaac Newton had “destroyed the beauty and poetry of the rainbow by reducing the mystery to a prism”. He lamented

“will natural philosophy yet clip an Angel’s wings / conquer all mysteries by Rule and Line?
Empty the haunted air, the gnomed mine / and unweave the colours in the rainbow?

Time and experience has shown that science and aesthetics complement each other in a better and wider understanding. The mysteries of our world (the things we know that we do not know) have grown exponentially with our greater vision over the horizons of yesteryear. We know that life needs a natural balance of light and darkness, of joy and sorrow. We know of atoms and of cells, we know the process of procreation; we know that our emotions of love, hate, trust, fear, ambitions and sympathy are controlled by hormones our body generates to meet given situations. We know how drugs and alcohol interfere with our bodily functions. Yet the feeling of mystery around us is, if anything, greater than ever. Our vision of God has grown and widened too. It no longer includes favourite people or nations, it is everywhere – within and without -- and nowhere at the same time. Its laws are the laws of life and Nature and they match the infinity of the universe.
Let us now sing the second hymn, number 42 “Herr dir ist niemand zu vergleichen...” both verses.

Would you light a candle in the sunshine, in a noisy or windy environment? No, to appreciate the light of a candle, the softness of its glow, the uplifting symbol of the flame pointing finger-like to heaven, the invigorating smell of the beeswax, it needs a subdued atmosphere, shadows in the corner, beautiful music and open and receptive minds. The beauty of a lit candle lies in the limited interaction it has with the wider environment; bounded by darkness and mystery it is (it can paradoxically only be) a symbol of goodness and friendship in a dark and scary world.

Charles Darwin has often been vigorously attacked for what he wrote and what he believed, it happens even today. However, the fact is that the typical attack on Darwin is light years away from the place where Darwin made his greatest impact on traditional understanding. Darwin forced us to acknowledge that Creation is an ongoing and unfinished process. Human life is evolving, there is no perfection, there never was; all life is in flux. That was the Darwinian insight. Our problem is that we do not yet know what to do with that understanding. We are still struggling with the appropriate balance of light and shadow in our lives. But are we not fortunate to have been giving the time and the ability in our lives to talk about these things? To consider these questions? Time to give meaning to a life between light and shadow, time for joy and sorrow in society, time for greater awareness of the nature around us and the desire to create a sustainable environment. We are indeed truly thankful for everything that makes life worth living.

Wer nie sein Brot mit Tränen ass, / wer nie die kummervollen Nächte
auf seinem Bette weinend sass / der kennt euch nicht, ihr himmlischen Mächte.

Thank you, Elisabeth, for the music, thank you to the unseen hands that arranged the flowers and thank all of you for sharing this the time with me. I wish you a pleasant afternoon with coffee and cake compliment of the Bentleigh community.

Return to the top

 

FAMILY SERVICE at BADGER CREEK  2/10/05

Elder, CHRISTINE RUFF

Good morning and a very special welcome to you all here at Badger Creek. Thank you for coming to share the day with one another.
The title I have given today’s informal service is “The Journey”.
I’d like to begin with some questions.

How did you get here today?
Was it fun?
What was the best part of the journey?

Recently our new bus, Rosa, took some other children on a journey. Rosa took our newest confirmands on their confirmation camp (some of them here today?). The very first part of the whole confirmation journey for our confirmands was the series of confirmation lessons, also including the Urban Camp. The second part of the confirmation journey, so far, was the post-confirmation camp. Aside from the creation of many hopefully great memories, the camp served to teach our confirmands several things, even if the kids themselves don’t think they learnt anything at all.

On the Confirmation Camp we went to Buchan, Tathra and Mallacoota. I know the kids really enjoyed these places but I think they would have enjoyed the camp just as much if we had gone somewhere else. For these kids, the journey was just as, if not more important than, the destination.
Other confirmation camps have gone in completely different directions and the participants have had just as good a time.

So, apart form the journey itself, what else do you think it was that made the camp enjoyable? (the people they were with).
These confirmands had everything they needed to have a good time, within easy reach. By this I don’t mean a microwave, hairdryer, mobile phone and i-pod (which incidentally were all present anyway). What we all required in order to have or create a good time was right under our noses (not literally), and that is, each other. If we went searching for other things to do, they were temporary distractions. Playing mini-golf was fun, but I for one, would not have enjoyed it on my own. It was “the group” which made the occasion.

I wonder, is there anyone who can recall another such occasion, i.e. where a group travelled somewhere to be together, but the destination was not really that important. (Today!)
Back to Confirmation Camp. Confirmands: as none here, others may have to help answer these questions

Confirmands:
If you wanted to have somewhere relatively secure to sleep for the night, what did you have to do? (set up tent).
Did the leaders do it for you?
What if you’d waited for them to do it for you? (waiting an awfully long time!).
What if you were hungry? What if you wanted some dinner?
(had to cook it first).
Where did the food come from? (had to buy it).
Who decided what was needed/ingredients? (kids).
If you wanted clean plates and cutlery to eat with at your next meal?
(wash up own dishes).
If you didn’t want the bus to resemble a rubbish bin by the second day…?
If you wanted to get going somewhere early in the morning…? (take tents down, help pack trailer…)
To some extent, who planned the activities? (combined, not always told what to do).
So basically, if you wanted something to happen, what did you have to do? (make it happen). If you wanted change, you had to create it.

We will read more about confirmation camp in the next TR, but highlighting today’s discussion are three important life lessons:
i) The journey is often more important than the destination.
ii) You don’t have to look too far afield in life to see the things of value / the things you need (you are often surrounded by them, e.g. people).
iii) and finally, don’t wait for things to happen – make them happen yourself!

I would like to share a book with you now, called The Friendship Trip by Wolfgang Slawski.

Now here come the usual questions…..

What was the man doing at the station? (waiting for someone to come visit him).
When no-one ever came, what did he do? (went to another station).
What happened there? (no-one visited or got off but someone else was waiting, just like him).
What did they both do? (went to a different station and met others waiting).

Eventually there was a whole town’s worth of people waiting for someone to visit them. These people journeyed on until there was nowhere they hadn’t been. They had been everywhere searching for others to be with, and still hadn’t found them. They had looked everywhere for friends and waited in all sorts of places for visitors and were still looking.

What happened then?
Arthur suddenly realised they didn’t need to look further! Why not? They were surrounded by all the friends they needed! While they had been searching, what they were looking for was slowly appearing around them. At the end, what they wanted was sitting or standing right next to them. The people they were so busily looking for were the ones they were with! Arthur realised they were all friends now and that they could all visit each other. So that night they had a party and made plans to visit each other when they got home.

I wonder if this is how our confirmands feel about each other??
On their confirmation journey and indeed, in their life journey, respectively they were and hopefully will be surrounded by all the people they need to meet their needs and see them through. Just like Arthur on his train.

Do you think there was anything else Arthur learnt from his experience?
Were people coming to visit him while he was just sitting there waiting for them? (no – he had to go find them).
So Arthur learnt that he had to make changes. Things weren’t going to happen if he just waited for them to happen. It was up to him to do something. He couldn’t expect others to do it for him. He had to be proactive. Just as the confirmands on camp had to be if they wanted somewhere to sleep or something to eat or something to do. Just as Nanne and others were in organising today’s outing.

I wonder if you are beginning to see the similarities between all our journeys?

In The Friendship Trip Arthur perhaps learnt one final thing the confirmands and we already know and that is……? The journey is just as important as the destination. I don’t believe Arthur and his friends would have “arrived” where they had at the end of the story (ie. inviting each other over) if they had not shared the journey first. If Arthur and the others had been put together in a room and told to be friends, without first having shared a journey, I don’t believe it would have worked. By the end of the story Arthur’s group had already been everywhere, but they were still not happy until they realised it was not the “everywhere” that was important but the “everyone”. It was the communal searching, the shared goal, the whole experience which created the bond and cemented the friendships. As it will hopefully be for our confimands, and, for that matter, anyone in the Temple Society or the wider community who shares a journey of any description, as we have done today.

I read an interesting article yesterday, on weddings, which struck a chord. In it the author (who was getting married yesterday) states that as a bride, the best way to go is “to recognise everyone who has walked with you to this point and who you hope will keep walking alongside you”. Isn’t this beautiful? Walking together through life.

These life lessons of course, apply not only to the confimands and Arthur.
They are there for us all.
It is our challenge to recognise them when they appear and to learn from them.
On a daily basis this may mean that:

We acknowledge and value the things we take for granted around us, be they people, clean running water, fresh food, flushing toilets..
We nurture the friendships we have rather than feeling the need to constantly create new ones
We find treasure around us rather than looking over the horizon for what might be there
We look at our lives with eyes wide open
We walk through the forest but we see the trees
We recognise the opportunities that are presented to us every day and we take them
If we can’t see any opportunities, we create them
If we don’t like the lunch Mum makes us for school, we make our own
If the council can’t mow the park by next week for the street party, we do it ourselves
If we want to go bushwalking we organise a bushwalking club
If we want a job we walk from shop to shop with our CV/resume until we find one
If we want to find friends we wait at a different railway station or we go and talk to the lonely kid over there in the corner
If we want to live in a clean world, we begin by tidying our bedroom

And it may mean that:

We are not in such a hurry to always get somewhere, or even, that we have a destination at all
That we enjoy the travel and make the journey worthwhile (that way, at least if the destination’s no good, we haven’t wasted our time just getting there)
That we make every day count
That we don’t spend our lives waiting for tomorrow, hoping it may be better than today.
And, as Diana Baillieu wrote into “The Age” on Wednesday this week: “[That we] go back to the horse and cart. [That we] slow down, don’t move so fast. [That we] don’t expect so much. [That we create] time to think. Time to notice, time to enjoy. Slower is happier and less is more.”

We will conclude the service now with a prayer. Please stay seated.

Dear fellow travellers / dear God,

As we go through life, please help us to help each other to really live it.
Please help us to really see each other.
Please help us to travel with our senses on full alert so that we don’t miss opportunities.
Where there is nothing, give us the courage to create something.
Let us have the inspiration, strength and desire to “do.”
Let us create change where necessary.
But at the same time, help us also just to “be” and to “be” with each other.
Help us to focus on the travel and the travel together.
And with a destination in mind, guide us so that we help each other reach our destinations whilst making the journeys infinitely worthwhile.
Guide us in our travels.

Amen.

Return to the top

 

Evensong Service 25 September in Bentleigh 17:00
Elder: Renate Weber
Pianist: Ingrid Laemle -Ruff

Reading: Luke 22:24-27
Hymns: Love life and live -song 116; Servant Song Hymn 114; Dona Nobis Pacem Hymn 24, give us peace; Ein Schiff das sich Gemeinde nennt, a ship that sails the sea of time, Hymn 28; Open my eyes, Hymn 87; Prayer of St Francis, Hymn 93.

Play opening orchestral piece: Humming Chorus Puccini - from Madame Butterfly

Welcome to this afternoon /evening service. Let us get into the swing by singing, “Love life and live” the two verses below “This is the Day.” Hymn 116
I have just loved life and lived these last few weekends! Last weekend the Templer Choir participated very successfully in the German Choir Festival in Perth. I will share one little saying the German Consul General shared with the entire audience “Wo man singt da lass dich ruhig nieder, den böse Menschen haben keine Lieder” (rough translation - where people sing together you are safe to stop a while as bad people don’t sing.) On Friday and Saturday I have been part of Grand final fever in Melbourne. I had breakfast with the Governor General, the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition among other very distinguished guests. I saw them they didn’t see me! I was just one of the other two thousand who were also there. For the match, I sat three rows from the boundary fence right behind the goal posts and actually enjoyed an excellent nail biting game of Aussie Rules football. What an extraordinary experience it has been! I am also very nervously excited about Tuesday when I fly over to Germany to spend four weeks with the German Templer community. Life leads us down some very diverse paths if you give it the opportunities, if you are willing to take risks, if you expose yourself to the unknown!
My life’s journey took a sharp detour when my husband, Winfried died in February 2000. We had been married happily for 35 years, had the usual ups and downs and were really beginning to enjoy the empty nest years and rediscovering ourselves as individual adults rather than in roles of mum or dad, teacher, small business owners. In 1999 I was offered a prestigious role as Acting Head of Middle School at MLC for about 6 months from September to April. I was to lead a team of staff and 600 hundred students including a country campus at Mallacoota where one quarter (75) of the year 9 cohort were in any given term. I was to become a leader. I share this story with you for a number of reasons. It provides a personal example of the reading for today and it also mentions Winfried who was the wind beneath my wings during many of the exhilarating and challenging moments of my life.

Our reading this evening comes from Luke Chapter 22 verses 24-27.

“24. A dispute also arose among them as to which one of them was to be regarded as the greatest.
25 But he said to them, "The kings of the Gentiles lord it over them; and those in authority over them are called benefactors. 26 But not so with you; rather the greatest among you must become like the youngest, and the leader like one who serves.
27 For who is greater, the one who is at the table or the one who serves? Is it not the one at the table? But I am among you as one who serves.”

During the six months I was Acting Head of Middle School, I was placed in the role as a leader but was also like the youngest, the most inexperienced. I was the person with whom the buck stopped -parents came to me for advice. I was also a benefactor. I could give casual clothes days, I could pardon undesirable behaviour, I could give students a second chance, the benefit of the doubt or I could really express my disappointment and give them an ultimatum “shape up or ship out.” In our reading, Jesus was telling his disciples that he would soon leave them. They had just shared the last supper together. Jesus had adopted the clothes of the servant, he wrapped a towel around his waist and he washed the disciples’ feet. He showed by his actions what he wanted them to do. He wanted them to serve mankind, to spread his message of love. But the disciples were arguing amongst themselves who would assume the mantel of the leader! Many of us like to be recognised. We define ourselves by our job, our role in life. Hello I am Renate Weber, marriage celebrant, Elder in the Temple Society, a very novice golfer, and the person who visits my mum and assist her with the daily needs. Chief cook and bottle washer for myself. Widow. All labels, all of which conjure up images. In how many of those roles am I like a servant? For whom do I perform the tasks? For the people I work with, or for my sake, to stroke my ego, to make me feel good? Do I do it out of love for others or because I want recognition for my self?
I was given a little book called Inner Gold by a friend, on one page it suggests: -
“Look down at your hands.
Are you a taker or a giver?
What have you taken or given today?
When we give to others freely, openly and with out expectation we generate a limitless supply of love. The more we give the more love we get.”

When I was teaching I really enjoyed helping my students learn. There was an immense sense of satisfaction when a whole class or even half the group got the message of the lesson.
I saw teaching as a life of service. I think I was blessed with a gift to be a teacher. I see this text to mean being a “servant” means using our gifts — all our material and spiritual gifts — not just for ourselves and our own enrichment, but also for the service and enrichment of others. We have so many wonderful “servants” in the Temple Society. The choir uses its gifts to make music for others as well for their own enjoyment. We have many volunteers who perform tasks without recognition or public acknowledgement, volunteers who go to the TTHA and fed those who can’t manage for themselves. Herta Uhlherr gives so much love and effort to produce the Templer Record. Alfred Klink services our web messages, Winnie Beilharz drives our buses, ladies arrange flowers for the services, lawns get mowed around our halls, functions get organised for the enjoyment of us all. Musicians offer their talents to play for our Services; the list goes on.
It can also be quite challenging to be a “servant”. Some times the people you are offering to “serve” don’t want or appreciate your service! Let us sing The Servant Song now Hymn 114 all 6 verses.
The other reason I mentioned Winfried earlier is because of a conversation I had with another Templer recently. She was grieving for a loved one and feeling very alone in her grief. We talked about other cultures and how they deal with the death of a loved one. In Japan they remember / celebrate the deceased’s life on their death day. They visit the graveside and give prayers. By remembering their loved one publicly and communally they are celebrating and honouring that person and their memory and also feeling that others are there supporting them and sharing in the remembering.
Let us sing the Canon Dona Nobis Pacem hymn 24 Give us peace. I’ll ask Annette to help us.
I am going to light a candle now for Winfried’s memory. (If it were early in the day I’d let a balloon go in his memory, to signify his spirit flying high and free from all earthly tethers.) By mentioning his name and lighting a candle I acknowledge the role he played in my life as my partner, my friend, my mate and also how much he served the Templer community. May this light illuminate his memory in our hearts. Wilhelm Imberger asked me to light two candles for him in his absence for Immanuel and Friedericke Imberger, his parents. Karin Ruff asked me to light a candle for her dad and our past President, Dieter Ruff
I know a few others are also going to participate, be it out loud or in quiet remembrance of their loved one. Please feel free to join in.
Play Orchestral piece:
S Carvelli Cantari Cantari The guitar is the song, played by John Williams

To conclude this segment I am going to share the words that
Isolde and Dieter Ruff included in their Sympathy card after Winfried’s death. They were written by Jack Kornfeld a Buddhist teacher as they thought they captured how Winfried had lived his life and I am sure as all those you are remembering, did as well.
“In the end these thing matter most:
How well did you love?
How fully did you live?
How deeply did you learn to let go?”

It is this message we can all ask ourselves at the end of every day
“How well did you love?
How fully did you live?
How deeply did you learn to let go?”
Each day is new beginning and we should never assume we can delay too many actions for an unknown tomorrow.
Lets us pray if you are able to stand please do so.

Dear God,
First I ‘d like to pray for all the people in our community who are not well, or who have just recently undergone surgery, we ask that their recovery is speedy, A number of our members are battling cancer, we send them messages of love, courage and strength.
We have shared many emotions here tonight. We have gathered and sung songs of joy and praise, we have shared memories of our loved ones whose physical presence is no longer with us on this earth. We give thanks that those whom we remembered this evening were able to play a significant and meaningful part in our lives and often in the life of our community as well. By openly sharing our memories, by sharing our loss, we can gain strength in the knowledge that we don’t grieve alone.
Help us to live our lives to the fullest, remind us that at times we need to be the servant while at other times we also need to allow people to serve us. Being able to receive graciously is also a divine gift. Let us continue to share in the joy that being part of this Templer community provides as we say the Lord’s Prayer together.


Our father in Heaven
Hallowed be your name
Your Kingdom come
Your will be done on earth as in heaven
Give us today our daily bread
Forgive us our sins
As we forgive those who sin against us
Lead us when in temptation and deliver us from evil
For the Kingdom the power and the glory
Are yours forever. Amen


Let us sing Hymn no 28 all 5 verses. Ein Schiff das sich Gemeinde nennt. A ship that sails the sea of time. Four verses

Now I’d like us to sing Hymn 87 Open my eyes. My lovely Onkel Wilhelm and I were talking at the recent confirmation service and he was reminiscing about his early days after being interned and how hard it was at times. He shared the best advice he was ever given by one of the Australians who took him under their wing. “Bill", he said, "you have three important tools you need to learn to use. Your eyes to see, your ears to hear and you have a mouth to ask. If you use them wisely you will have success." This song adds a final proviso you must also to be silent or quiet to hear the messages you need to sink in. By using these senses we all have, we can decide when we need to be a “servant” and when we need to allow some one to serve us. I think this is a really important skill especially in relationships. In a modern marriage we like to see ourselves as equal partners. In the past it was often the role of the woman to serve the man first, then the family and to meet her needs last. In today’s society it is so hard with all the laws regarding equality, sexual harassment, racial vilification to find a sensible path to follow but if we use Jesus message to love God and treat others, as we would like to be treated we really can’t go wrong.

Let us conclude with the Prayer of St Francis. Hymn 93

Thank you all for coming, good night, safe home and see you on the 6th of November in the Bayswater Chapel

Play Andrea Bocelli with Sarah Brightman “Time to Say Goodbye”

The collection this evening will go to the Field of Women, an organization that assist men and women who have been diagnosed with breast cancer.

Return to the top

 

Fathers' Day Service 4 September in Bayswater

Elder: Mark Herrmann

Opening music – Monika Richter (flute) and Monika Herrmann (piano) – “Take these wings”

Good morning! My name is Mark Herrmann, an Elder of the Temple Society Australia, and I welcome you all to this special day of celebration – here, in Australia, the first Sunday in September is traditionally Fathers’ Day. As both a son and parent, I am very fortunate to be able to observe fatherhood from a number of different perspectives. I look forward to the opportunity to share some of my thoughts with you this morning.

The Sunday School children have joined us for the first part of our service. I was recently standing at the counter of our local bookshop, waiting to purchase a particular book, when I noticed this book, so I bought it as well. It is called “Dear Dad – father, friend and hero” and I would like to begin by sharing some of the images and associated commentary it contains.

Slide show (Dear Dad.ppt) and chat with children grouped at the front.

Last week, at Christine Ruff’s delightful Family Service in Bentleigh, I invited the assembled children to provide me with their responses to the following questions:

1. What is it that will make your Dad happy?
2. How do you help your Dad?
3. How are you like your Dad?
4. What have you learnt from your Dad?
5. Why is your Dad your hero?

Read selected responses, then those from “older congregation members”, each time placing them in the fishing net of the male figure. If time permits, seek further responses from the floor. Finish by putting a big smile and a love heart on the figure.

Let us conclude the involvement of our Sunday School children by singing together and then in a three-part round “Dona nobis pacem (Give us peace)”, hymn number 24.

“Manhood” is a book written by Steve Biddulph, author of the number one bestseller “Raising Boys”. In the chapter entitled “You and your father”, Biddulph writes (and I quote): “Coming to terms with your father, having a rounded view of him, is especially important if you are a father yourself, and more so if you are in any kind of leadership role. You will never have authority until you can respect authority – which means, in this leaderless world, finding some authority worthy of your respect.” (unquote) The following excerpt relates the story of a man phoning his father, long distance. The younger man is making an attempt to bridge the gap that has grown between them. Father and son have had little contact in recent years, and the son has been doing some thinking. When the father answers the phone, the son begins to try to tell him …

‘Hi, Dad, it’s me.’
‘Oh, uh huh! Hi, son! I’ll go get your mother …’
‘No, don’t get Mum. It’s you I want to talk to …’
There’s a pause, then …
‘Why? Do you need money?’
‘No, I don’t need money.’
And the younger man starts on his somewhat rehearsed, but still vulnerable speech …
‘I’ve just been remembering a lot about you, Dad, and the things you did for me. Working all those years in a job you hated, to put me through college, supporting us. My life is going well now and it’s because of what you did to get me started. I just thought about it and realised I’d never really said “Thanks” …’
Silence on the other end of the phone. The son continues.
‘I want to tell you … Thanks. And that I love you.’
There’s a long pause before the father answers.
‘You been drinking????’

Biddulph concludes (quote): “Whenever I tell this story the audience laughs out loud, but the men laugh with eyes wet and shining.” (unquote)

Why are men generally harder to communicate with? Is it the perceived societal demand of the strong, silent type? I know my own relationship with Dad is not really one of in-depth conversations and meaningful dialogue of what ails us and the world. Us Herrmanns, at least this particular branch of the family, are not blessed with the ability of making small-talk. I have discussed this with Mum – of course – on a number of occasions. She reassures me that Dad is simply not the demonstrative type, at least not in the verbal sense. I know that Dad will always rather use three words, than half a dozen, especially when three will suffice. But, that does not make him any less accessible to his family or any less available for comfort and support. He may not be at ease in openly displaying his feelings, but would probably argue such emotion is simply not to be displayed for everyone’s benefit. He certainly loves his family no less for being this way. We children know he has not and will not shirk from doing anything for us. He has his own way of “being there”. I have come to recognise this, accept it and make the most of it. It would be pointless and totally counterproductive to make either of us something we are not. Dad, I hope you understand my “long distance phone call”. With heartfelt gratitude, immense respect and love, I say “thanks”.

Our text for today comes from Matthew: Chapter 7, Verses 24-27.

According to William Barclay’s Bible commentary, Jesus was an expert in a double sense. He was an expert in scripture. The writer of Proverbs gave him the hint for his picture. From Proverbs 10:25 it says: “Storms come, and the wicked are blown away, but honest people are always safe”. Here is the germ of the picture which Jesus drew of the two houses and the two builders. But Jesus was also an expert in life. He was the craftsman who knew all about the building of houses, and when he spoke about the foundations of a house he knew what he was talking about. This is no illustration formed by a scholar in his study; this is the illustration of a practical man.

Nor is this a far-fetched illustration; it is a story of the kind of thing which could well happen. In Palestine the builder must think ahead. There was many a gully which in summer was a pleasant sandy hollow, but was in winter a raging torrent of rushing water. A man might be looking for a house; he might find a pleasantly sheltered sandy hollow; and he might think this a very suitable place. But, if he was a short-sighted man, he might well have built his house in the dried-up bed of a river, and, when the winter came, his house would disintegrate. Even on an ordinary site it was tempting to begin building on the smoothed-over sand and not to bother digging down to the shelf of rock below, but that way disaster lay ahead.

Only a house whose foundations are firm can withstand the storm; and only a life whose foundations are sure can stand the test. Jesus demanded two things.
(i) He demanded that men should listen. One of the great difficulties which face us today is the simple fact that men often do not know what Jesus said or what the Church teaches. In fact the matter is worse. They have often a quite mistaken notion of what Jesus said and of what the Church teaches. The first step to the Christian life is simply to give Jesus Christ a chance to be heard.
(ii) He demanded that men should do. Knowledge only becomes relevant when it is translated into action. It would be perfectly possible for a man to pass an examination in Christian Ethics with the highest distinction, and yet not to be a Christian. Knowledge must become action; theory must become practice; theology must become life.
If we are to be in any sense followers of Jesus we must hear and do. Here I end Barclay’s commentary on the text.

When first reading the verses, I must admit that my mind struggled to get past the story of the three little pigs, with their houses of first straw, then sticks and, ultimately, bricks, all under threat from the huff and puff of the big, bad wolf. And, one’s thoughts are immediately drawn to the natural disaster having occurred during this past week in New Orleans and Louisiana in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

Chapters 5, 6 and 7 of Matthew’s Gospel – the Sermon on the Mount – depict the words of Jesus, while Chapter 8 – divine love in action – describes the deeds of Jesus.

What are the foundations on which we build our lives? In answering this I have also tried to identify the important elements of community building within the Temple Society. Here, the sense of community working party from a few years ago recognised building blocks like acceptance, freedom, equality, inclusiveness, friendship, guidance, compassion, understanding, support, sharing, unity and diversity, belonging and caring as important for a vision of the Temple Society now and in the future. Personally, elements such as happiness, wellbeing, relationships and trust, safety, justice, integrity, success and achievements, however measured, spring readily to mind, as do our abilities and potential to love, forgive, listen, care and live.

Much has been coming from Canberra of late about values. Is it the Government view, the Christian view, the Australian view, the Muslim view? The Federal Education Minister, Dr Brendan Nelson, spoke of “believing in care and compassion and doing your best … and pursuing and protecting the common good”. But, what do we believe collectively? What are the defining values that distinguish Australians from other nationalities? And are these somehow contrary to mainstream Islamic values? The answer is “no” on the last score, insisted a Muslim teacher from the Australian Council for Islamic Education in Schools. Abdul Rahman Najmeddine (pronounced Rachman Naj-meddine) said “I can’t see a difference between Islamic values or Christian, or Jewish or ‘Australian’ values. Muslim values include honesty, truthfulness and social justice.”

Father Greg O’Kelly, of the Jesuit order and Brendan Nelson’s school religion teacher, was quoted as saying of Australian values “a sense of equality, a sense of fairness, care for the underdog and a fairly strong sense of community”, while World Vision chief executive, Tim Costello, opined “there is no hands-on pragmatism that doesn’t like ideology and lots of talk, that prefers deeds to words”. Still, we must strive to hear and do. The Commonwealth Government’s National Framework for Values Education in Australian Schools sets out its nine core values as care and compassion; doing your best; fair go; freedom; honesty and trustworthiness; integrity; respect; responsibility; and understanding, tolerance and inclusion. Next year the Victorian State Government will introduce its own “principles” to be taught in schools: openness of mind, pursuit of excellence, respect for evidence, learning for all, and engagement and effort.

I believe the issue with values, as with religion and belief systems generally, is to look for the areas of commonality, rather than focussing on the differences. What’s more, the similarities are many, which is just as well if we seriously want everyone in this world to understand and get on better with each other. Here, I am reminded of the efforts of the local Knox Interfaith Network, of which the Temple Society is a part. This group meets regularly to discuss matters of common concern, to provide opportunities for dialogue and understanding, to produce and/or distribute informative and fair-minded literature on religious organisations and their practices with sensitivity. The Interfaith Network’s stated objective is to encourage proper understanding of religious communities in Knox, so that each religious group and the community generally may be good neighbours

I believe the values presented to us and under which we choose to live, guide us, shape us and make us the individual we are and the person we put on show to others. The following simply and succinctly outlines an affirmative, and I think encouraging, life philosophy.

Keep your thoughts positive because your thoughts become your words.
Keep your words positive because your words become your actions.
Keep your actions positive because your actions become your habits.
Keep your habits positive because your habits become your values.
Keep your values positive because your values become your destiny.

Now, please excuse my self-indulgence as I tell some home truths of the Herrmann family. In doing so, I hope you can perhaps relate them to your own family situations.

As a child, when I used to get up much earlier in the mornings, I remember Dad’s daily routine of preparing for work: of dressing, of boiling the water in the pale yellow electric jug for shaving in front of the bathroom cabinet, of the cup of tea, the poached eggs and two lightly browned pieces of toast for breakfast. I doubt whether the jug has stood the test of time, but it’s a fair bet the rest has stayed much the same. I, too, am a creature of habit, preferring to complete tasks in the same, particular fashion. I never really associated this methodical and ordered trait as being inherited from my father’s habits. Further, from my sister Anita I heard the words “dependable” and “trustworthy”, but I thought one of her daughters summed it up accurately and beautifully with “silently supportive”. Brother Rob, presently overseas and therefore unable to defend himself, was – according to Mum – in his last year of secondary school, not too fond of study, but rather partial to a good time. One night after a rowdy student dinner he came home in the early hours somewhat worse for wear, resulting in him being physically sick in his bedroom. Apparently, after this and another incident in which he fell asleep at the wheel and ploughed into a light pole, Rob admired and found greater long-term benefit in Dad’s quiet assistance and making good, without the need for long lectures and stressing a young adventurous spirit’s error of judgement.

Similarly, there is much to respect and emulate in trying to learn reliability, perseverance, strength of character and self-control. However, on the practical side, I came up well short in the gene pool. When moving from the farm at Pakenham to the unit in Bayswater, Dad set out all his tools and implements no longer needed and observed as his family good-naturedly haggled for them. It was all rather academic, because realistically what am I ever going to do with a battery charger or a circular saw? And as for my brother Rob snaffling the workbench … It was a tough day for Dad, firstly in accepting the move from the farm with its inherent solitude, secondly in acknowledging his declining ability to manage and thirdly, and probably most significantly, in struggling to come to terms with his sons laying claim to various pieces of equipment which were unlikely to be put to their proper use and never, ever again going to achieve outcomes which would otherwise be possible if placed into more capable hands. Thank goodness son-in-law Andrew, with practical mind and skills enough for all of us, was also about. In Dad’s eyes I am sure that Andrew’s presence saved the day. He is therefore the family keeper (and designated user) of the tools.

We used to have a simple swing in the backyard. Once we outgrew it, the supporting poles were sawn off at ground level. After mowing over the tops of the concrete foundations for many years, I decided one Saturday afternoon to dig them out. With gumboots on, armed with my trusty mattock, I was about two foot down, with absolutely no end in sight of the partly exposed concrete blocks: I reluctantly abandoned my forlorn mission. The foundations thus remain to this day, anchored to the centre of the earth, the tops knocked off to allow the grass to grow over and properly hide them. They sit just beneath the surface as testament to my father’s desire to provide something for his young family that would stand the test of time. For this, the swing was and is but one humble example.

While out riding my bike last weekend with friends, we stumbled across the following at the Jell’s Park teahouse: “Fatherhood is pretending the present you love most is soap on a rope”. If possible, Father’s Day is a day to share with your father, or a day on which to reflect on fond memories of past times together. By association, I like to think it includes the fathers of my parents – my grandfathers – and, similarly, the male figures from Nanne’s family.

According to a recent article in The Age Melbourne Magazine by Jonathan Green, Father’s Day was invented by a guilt-laden farmer’s daughter in Spokane, Washington in 1909. It was Sonora Smart Dodd who organised the first Father’s Day celebration in sleepy Spokane on June 19, 1910. The event honoured her own father, William Jackson Smart, who alone had raised Sonora and her siblings following the death of their mother. Mrs Smart died giving birth to her sixth child and would surely have relished the rich irony of her ultimate, painful maternal sacrifice sparking a global celebration of fatherhood. Father’s Day became something of an esoteric highlight of the otherwise humdrum Spokane year until 1926, when a national Father’s Day Committee was formed in New York. The day was recognised by a joint resolution of the US congress in 1956, proclaimed an official national holiday by President Lyndon Johnson in 1966 and was passed into law as a permanent institution by President Richard Nixon in 1972. The US law determines that Father’s Day shall be celebrated on the third Sunday in June.

If you are able, please stand as we pray. Taken from The Age cartoonist Michael Leunig’s book “When I talk to you” and certainly thinking of fathers and family as friends:
We give thanks for our friends.
Our dear friends.
We anger each other.
We fail each other.
We share this sad earth, this tender life, this precious time.
Such richness. Such wildness.
Together we are blown apart.
Together we are dragged along.
All this delight.
All this suffering.
All this forgiving life.
We hold it together.
Amen.

We will conclude this morning’s service by singing together hymn number 36 “God, you call for faithful service”. We shall sing all four verses.

Thank you to all, those seen and also those unseen, who have contributed today. I wish all our fathers – whether here or elsewhere – a very special day. I believe the most loved present for a father is not soap on a rope, but his children. And what will make my Dad happy? I suspect something/anything involving a tennis court.

Closing music – Irene Blaich

Return to the top



CONFIRMATION SERVICE 14 August
in Bayswater

Elder:             Renate Weber
Pianist:           Monika Strasser

Hymns: Templer Hymn No 1 “Seek ye first of all God’s Kingdom/Trachtet ruft mit ernstem Worte”     Verses 1,3,6,9,10; “Pebbles” Hymn 61all the verses

Other music: “I am the Greatest. R Kelly. 

The confirmands process in slowly down the side aisle in alphabetical order, where the candles will be placed

Mieka Decker: Welcome everyone to our confirmation service. There are 19 of us here today who have this year participated in the journey of Confirmation. Our introductory song was “The World’s Greatest” by R Kelly. After much discussion the group chose it because it tells you that you can be anything you want to be, if you have the will to be it. Don’t be afraid of what you are and let your light shine out

R KELLY LYRICS
"The World's Greatest"
I am a mountain
I am a tall tree
Ohhh, I am a swift wind
Sweepin' the country
I am a river
Down in the valley
Ohhh, I am a vision
And I can see clearly
If anybody asks u who I am

Just stand up tall look 'em in the Face and say

[Chorus]
I'm that star up in the sky
I'm that mountain peak up high
Hey, I made it
I'm the worlds greatest
And I'm that little bit of hope
When my backs against the ropes
I can feel it mmm
I'm the worlds greatest

I am a giant
I am an eagle
I am a lion
Down in the jungle
I am a marchin' band
I am the people
I am a helpin' hand
And I am a hero
If anybody asks u who I am
Just stand up tall look 'em in the Face and say

[Chorus]
I'm that star up in the sky
I'm that mountain peak up high
I made it
I'm the worlds greatest
And I'm that little bit of hope
When my backs against the ropes
I can feel it
I'm the worlds greatest

Renate Weber I’d like to add my welcome to Mieka’s on this special day in the lives of our confirmands. This day sees the culmination of six months of work for this group of 19 young people.  In the Temple Society, a small independent Christian Community, we offer a set of Confirmation classes to our 14-16 year olds. They have been meeting regularly with various Elders to prepare them selves for this big day. I am going to light the first candle for today’s Service. Those of you who know me well know I love using candles both at home and in Services. To me the flame burning brightly represents many things. Physically, the power of one candle is quite amazing. It lights up the immediate area where it stands and it has the ability to radiate out into the farthest corners of a dark room. While it dispels darkness it imbues a softness that doesn’t show all the faults. It leaves some things in shadow. I also see the candle as representing my inner light, my heart light, where my spiritual being resides. Occasionally the flame burns very low like a candle with a faulty wick, and my light, my energy doesn’t radiate out. But if I trim the wick, deal with the problem that is troubling me, I can once again feel my inner strength build up.  I can then radiate out my positive energy and can feel much happier and stronger. By sharing my light, my flame hasn’t diminished and when we all radiate our light together it is a wonderful experience and we can hopefully live in an enlightened world. I read the preamble for the constitution for the Temple Society and felt very proud and comfortable that I am an active member of this community. As individual building stones in God’s temple, communally we aim to be tolerant towards others to ensure the world we live in is environmentally, socially and politically harmonious.

Traditionally our first hymn is the Templer Hymn (Seek ye first of all God’s Kingdom/Trachtet ruft mit ernstem Worte Hymn 1 in the hymnbook. Nicholas Herrmann will tell us what its significance is and why we are singing the verses chosen.

Nicholas Herrmann Christoph Hoffmann wrote the words of this hymn and in German the first word of each verse states the aim of the Temple Society: Trachtet am ersten nach dem Koenigreich Gottes und nach Seiner Gerechtigkeit, in the English version these words have been used in the first line of the first verse “Seek ye first of all God’s Kingdom”. The verses we will be singing are 1.3.6.9 and 10. The reason we’re singing these specific verses are:

Verse 1 explains how Jesus guides us to look towards the future and what it will be like, how we need to set our goals high. We need to make our own choices. Verse 3 tells us that every person is special and how we have changed over time. It also explains that each person has a point in life.

Verse 6 explains how there is truth, love and justice for those who are willing to work towards these ideals and we need to be examples. Verse 9 explains how strong you must be to succeed in life, to not give up as you strive for your goals.

Verse 10 the final verse, puts a close to all the above verses. Firstly to remember Jesus’ commandments, his faith in all and to answer to the call of Jesus.

Please sing it in English if you can, as that is how we have learnt it. 

Jessica Beilharz and Daniel Schlender will now share what Confirmation in the Temple Society is.

Jessica Beilharz.  Confirmation is a learning and inner-strengthening experience shared with other young Templers around the same age. Through the process of confirmation you get to learn about many different things relating to the Temple Society religion, the chance to make new friends and not getting the chance to sleep in on Sunday mornings. Confirmation is a beginning.
Daniel Schlender 
“Confirmation in the Temple Society to me means you are now no longer considered to be a child; after Confirmation you are considered to be a young adult. We learnt a greater understanding of the Temple Society's religious beliefs. We now have the ability to make choices more independently. Now that we have finished Confirmation, I would like to have the opportunity to participate in more Templer activities. I would also like to maintain the connections and friendships that I have gained through the Confirmation lessons.”

Renate Weber I chose a reading from Nelson Mandela to set the theme for today’s special service Patrick Brown will read it out and Daniel Beilharz will tell us how it applies to us.

Patrick Brown "Our worst fear is not that we are inadequate; our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us. We ask ourselves, “Who am I to be brilliant gorgeous, talented, fabulous?” Actually, who are you not to be? You are a child of God: your playing small doesn’t serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking, so that other people won’t feel insecure around you. We were born to make manifest the glory of God within us. It is not just in some of us, it is in everyone and as we let our own light shine we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear our presence automatically liberates others-Nelson Mandela

Daniel Beilharz “Nelson Mandela is one of the great moral and political leaders of our time, he is an international hero whose life long dedication to the fight against racial oppression in South Africa won him the Nobel Prize and the Presidency of his country.
Nelson Mandela read these words you just heard at the 1994 Inaugural speech to inspire his people. His inspiring writings, I think help give us confidence and diminish our fears, it also helps us to see the bigger purpose of our lives and inspires and empowers us to do well. It aids us in spreading light, love and divine grace around the world.

Many people wonder why others can achieve such great things and begin to pity themselves for not being able to be like them. We admire others, but we forget to admire ourselves. As it said in the reading, we have a right to be anything we wish -beautiful successful, as long as we use the unique talents that God gave us we can do anything. You also need to realise not using your talent in this world doesn’t help you or anyone else.

Although the reading suggests we would rather believe in our inabilities than in our greatness, that we are afraid of being wrong, are scared of what we are capable of and are therefore afraid of what we can do rather than what we can’t, the only way to overcome these fears and beliefs is if you spend less time worrying about the results and outcome of something and more in your unique talents, believing that the results will come if you remain true to your own ability. Imagine the world where your self-belief is proportionate to your enormous talent and where your incredible desire to succeed over comes your fear of failure.

When we do good things people see us and follow our example. Other people no longer fear doing good things as well. So as Templers we need to lead by example and let our light shine strongly. One reason that so many spiritual caterpillars never became butterflies is because they were eaten by doubt, fear or intimidation.

I have found some quotes that are quite related to the reading.

“ If you wish the world to become loving and compassionate, become loving and compassionate yourself. If you wish to diminish fear in the world, diminish your own, these are the gifts you can give”

-“Seat of the Soul” by Gary Zukav.

“Thousands of candles can be lighted from a single candle, and the life of the candle will not be shortened. Happiness never decreases by being shared.” Buddha

“We all walk in the dark and each of us must learn to turn on his or her own light.” -Earl Nightingale

Renate Weber I was so impressed at the research that Daniel Beilharz completed for his section. I didn’t give him any guidance or help but I was happy that he had picked up on all the issues and especially the light and dark theme of today’s Service. Each Confirmand will now symbolically light their candle from the first candle I lit at the beginning of the service to signify the vibrancy of life within each one of these special young people. All of them will have a part to play in their confirmation ceremony.

We will begin with Karl Wennagel and work alphabetically backwards. (I am a W!)

Renate Weber gives him a candle -he can light it from the first candle and then place it on his candle stand. Each Confirmands name is read out they light their candle and places it on their stand.

Karl Wennagel, Michael Schulz, Daniel Schlender, Linden Ruff, Dayne Ruff. Dirk Lubitz. Sam Lingham, Nicholas Herrmann, Jessica

Edelmaier, Mieka Decker, Caitlin Crowe, Patrick Brown, Thomas Blackwell, Riannon Berkeley, Rebecca Beilharz, Lisa Beilharz, Jessica Beilharz. Ingrid Beilharz and Daniel Beilharz

Dirk Lubitz will now read From the Old Testament

Dirk Lubitz I am reading a text from the Old Testament today, from the book of Jonah, Chapter 3 verse 10 Chapter 4 verses 1to 3.

“When God saw that the people had stopped doing evil things, he had pity and did not destroy them as he had planned. Jonah was really upset and angry so he prayed: Our Lord I knew from the very beginning that you wouldn’t destroy Nineveh. That is why I left my own country and headed for Spain. You are a kind and merciful God, and you are very patient. You always show love, and you don’t like to punish any one not even foreigners”

Most of us know about Jonah and the whale, but the message Jonah wants to give the people is that the Lord has mercy on everyone and He is very patient. So rather than punishing or hurting people God always shows love.

 Renate Weber I felt this was an important enough reading to include in today’s Service for two reasons firstly we use very few reading from the old Testament, because we find many old Testament lessons less relevant in our lives today and secondly this reading reinforces the new testament message about loving one another and living in harmony to create a more peaceful world.

Jessica Edelmaier  “Our second reading comes from the New Testament from the Gospel according to Luke Chapter 11: verses 33-36

“No one lights a lamp and then hides it or puts in under a clay pot. A lamp is put on a lamp stand so that every one who comes into the house can see the light. Your eyes are the lamp for your body. When your eyes are good you have all the light you need. But when your eyes are bad everything is dark. So be sure that your light isn’t darkness. If you have light, and nothing is dark, then light will be everywhere as when a lamp shines brightly on you.”

This reading was chosen because it ties in with our theme of light. We have a choice of what we see and how we see it. We can chose to see the light, the good, the positives or we can choose to see the darkness, the bad or the negatives.

If you show the good, the light, to others then they see the light too and it can have a ripple effect. So don’t hide your light. Be the best you can be! “If you have light and nothing is dark then light will be every where as the lamp shines brightly on you.

Renate Weber    We had the opportunity to spend time together at an urban camp in the City.  This gave the Cofirmands an opportunity to be together for a longer period of time and we were also able to work with the distant confirmands in person, rather than over a telephone line. One of my lessons with the last two confirmation groups has been to share some of the history of the Temple Society. I’d show the Templer History as a PowerPoint picture show and we used to invite the confirmands to find a relative who had grown up in Palestine and ask them a few relevant questions. This time I decided we should use the resources we have available to us “live”. I invited a number of people who had differing experiences to share some of their memories with us. Each living treasure was invited to bring in a few items to show the group during our stay at the Melbourne Discovery Urban Camp. I think it was a successful exercise as the confirmands had an opportunity to speak one on one with someone who had actually experienced a piece of our history, be it in Cyprus or an internee in Tatura, growing up in Jerusalem, Betlehem or Wilhelma or as a child in Jerusalem.  Sam Lingham, Michael Schulz and then Thomas Blackwell will share what they learnt from these generous people.


Sam Lingham At the urban camp we had the opportunity to talk to our living resources about life before they came to Australia. From living in Palestine our living treasures learned to work in a Community of people with a common goal and live well, even when surrounded by barbed wire. They learned there is no point in whinging and asking for handouts. You have to get on with it and make the best of what you’ve got!

 

Michael Schulz I learned about how the Templers established themselves in Palestine.   They built their own houses from bricks they sourced locally.  The houses were so well built that they are still standing today and are now protected heritage buildings.

Templers also built their roads, which are still in use today.  One road is still the main road of the city.  They also made their wagons to transport their produce locally and for export. 

They planted plantation that had not been grown in the Middle East.  These included oranges, vines, and apples.  They also produced vegetables, made their own bread, produced milk & cheeses from their own cows and meat from their own cattle

The Templers also built and ran their own school. They also built an orphanage, which looked after Arabic children.

Thomas Blackwell 

I learnt about the kind of conditions they lived in, what it was like being a girl or a boy in Palestine and the kind of jobs they could do. I learnt about Confirmation in those days and that many of the boys looked after the family farm or became apprentice blacksmiths, bakers or other tradesmen. The conditions they had were limited by the war and placed restrictions on what they could do. They made friendships as they travelled around during their internships. I also learnt about life in internment -sleeping in tents in Cyprus and in barracks in Tatura. When the internees left the camps many grew their own vegetables and had to make a fresh start each time.

Ingrid Beilharz, Caitlin Crowe and Linden Ruff come up next

Ingrid Beilharz “At our recent confirmation camp, we created stained glass windows. The person shape represents our inner spirit and we are holding an issue we feel strongly about. These windows are not just works of art!

In my stained glass window the issue that I feel is important is that we should spread love rather than war and hate. In simpler terms you should love your neighbour as your self from the twin commandments from Matthew. Love is very contagious; it spreads when you are around a loving or happy person, the love shines out to everyone. Without it would be hard to live. We should all let our love be the light.

Caitlin Crowe My stained glass window uses the teardrop to represent the issue of wasting water.  This is an important issue because water is a vital part in everyone’s lives. With out water we wouldn’t survive. We also need to think of others in the future, as they will need water as well. The rainbow on the figure represents everybody happily together. Each colour represents an individual and the fact that they are in a rainbow shows they are all in harmony.”

Linden Ruff "The symbol on my stained glass window represents a snowflake turning into a droplet of water, this represents global warming which is an issue I feel strongly about."

Renate Weber will call up the confirmands in groups and Rolf Beilharz will perform the confirmation Ceremony. Each Confirmand is presented with a certificate of Confirmation containing the verse chosen for them. Each group is blessed before they resume their seats

Group 1 Daniel Beilharz
            Ingrid Beilharz
            Jessica Beilharz
            Lisa Beilharz
           
Rebecca Beilharz

Group 2 Riannon Berkeley
            Thomas Blackwell
            Patrick Brown
            Caitlin Crowe
            Mieka Decker

Group 3 Jessica Edelmaier
            Nicholas Herrmann
            Sam Lingham
            Dirk Lubitz
            Dayne Ruff

Group 4 Linden Ruff
            Daniel Schlender
            Michael Schulz

            Karl Wennagel

What I learnt from confirmation

Rebecca Beilharz  When we started our confirmation classes I didn't realise that we would be learning about the history and background of the Temple Society. I didn't know there was a Templer motto which reads 'Set your mind on God’s kingdom before everything else, and all the rest will come to you’ as said in the bible from Matthew chapter 6 verse 33. Setting your mind on God’s kingdom means to me being how God would like us to be and doing what he requires and our conscience will tell us how to act justly with the matter. This is just one of the things we learnt during our confirmation lessons.
 
Karl Wennagel
I participated in the confirmation classes because my parents thought that I would benefit from them. I learnt a lot about the Bible and where the Templer motto came from. The most interesting thing that I learnt about was the older Templers or our “living resources” as Renate Weber likes to call them. But most of all I learnt about working as a team.

 Dayne Ruff “I participated in the Confirmation program because my parents and grandparents thought it would be a great experience. I also participated to strengthen friendships, to have an understanding of the Temple Society and to know what religion means.”

Renate Weber Each Confirmand was asked to write a letter of introduction to the teaching elders, they were given a set of guiding questions and asked to include a song or a poem to express an opinion they hold as important or relevant to them. Educators are telling us this generation of young people are going to see many changes in their lives. They will live in a global community. Distance will no longer be a barrier. They may work overseas. The technology they will have to work with and understand hasn’t even been invented yet! They may have a number of different careers; they will need to be flexible and adaptable. They are developing some understanding about religion, spiritualty and the Temple Society. The important thing we can give these young people is a secure and sound base from which they can venture forth. By encouraging them to be the best they can be, to let their light shine out, to be guided by their conscience, to treat others as they want to be treated we are providing them with a set of values they will be able to draw on wherever their life leads them.

Riannon Berkeley  “When we wrote our introductory letters, we had to nominate a piece that meant something to us. I nominated the following prayer – written by John Marsden – that I will read to you. He brings forth some important wishes that I share. A prayer for the 21st Century.”

 A PRAYER FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY          JOHN MARSDEN

May the road be free for the journey,
May it lead where it promised it would,
May the stars that gave ancient bearings
Be seen, still be understood.
May every aircraft fly safely,
May every traveller be found,
May sailors in crossing the ocean
Not hear the cries of the drowned.
 
          May gardens be wild like jungles,
May nature never be tamed,
May dangers create of us heroes,
May fears always have names.
May the mountains stand to remind us
Of what it means to be young,
May we be outlived by our daughters.
May we be outlived by our sons.
 
May the bombs rust away in their bunkers,
And the doomsday clock never be rewound.
May the solitary scientists, working,
Remember the holes in the ground.
May the knife remain in the holder,
May the bullet stay in the gun,
May those who live in the shadows
Be seen by those in the sun.

 Pebbles and Light candles Lisa Beilharz

“Many of us went to Sunday school when we were younger. I can always remember so clearly, sitting on the floor of the room with Renate Beilharz playing her guitar and us singing. As we got older we began to realise what the song meant. To us it means every action or emotion that we experience will affect everyone around us like ripples, whether it is in a good way or a bad way.

Please turn to hymn number 91, we will sing both verses.

Lisa continues

I’d now like to invite family members of the confirmands to light a candle from our candles. Each one of us has a shining light inside of us and we, as confirmands, would like to spread the light. We would like you to support our special light, we invite the family members of the confirmands to light a taper from their child’s candle and place it in the boxes.

 Monika Strasser will play some music.

Renate Weber Prayer for the Confirmands.

Mieka Decker comes up to read Lord’s Prayer

Great spirit who is over us, in us and around us, be with us today as we celebrate the Templer Rite of Passage called Confirmation. These young people, with the support of the Elders and their families have been asking and seeking to answer the big deep questions about faith.

Let them each be talented, brilliant, gorgeous and fabulous, let their unique precious inner light radiate out in to the world

May they have the humility to listen, the strength to stand up for what they believe is right, and the wisdom to know when they are wrong!  Be there in whatever form they need you when they ask for help, guidance and support, be it as a divine force, as their conscience, as a friend. Let us say the Lord’s Prayer together led by

Mieka Decker

Our father in Heaven,
Hallowed be your name,
 Your kingdom come,
Your will be done on earth as in heaven
Give us today our daily bread.
Forgive us our sins,
As we forgive those who sin against us.
Lead us when in temptation and deliver us from evil.
For the Kingdom the power and the glory
Are yours forever. Amen. 

Renate Weber

The Choir will conclude by singing the German version of the Lord’s Prayer.

Renate Weber All that now remains is to say a few thankyous!  To Monika Strasser for her music. To the teaching Elders, Rolf Beilharz, Harald Ruff, Herta Uhlherr, Renate Beilharz and Mark Herrmann. The Klinks for facilitating our star gazing, to the “living treasures” who made our history come to life, to the parents who cared enough to bring their children and support us in the confirmation program, to the extended families and friends who came today to share in this special celebration, to the choir for their wonderful contribution. Confirmands you are encouraged to take home your stained glass window and your candle with its uniquely crafted stand.  The offering today is for Canteen.  I hope you all enjoy the rest of Sunday.

Return to the top


SERVICE 10.07.2005 in Bayswater
Elder Rolf Beilharz

    Welcome to our service. Have you ever stopped to ask: what are we saying when we use the word “service” for what is really a period of contemplation on Sundays in this community chapel? In German the word used is Gottesdienst, meaning literally the service of God. Presumably the English word “service” also implies that we wish to serve God, to be servants of God.
    Does God need our service? If God is the all-powerful creator of the universe he probably gets on perfectly well without us. After all, except for the last million of the 1000 million years in which the Creator allowed life to evolve on this earth, life got on perfectly happily without humans. The most likely sense of the word “service”, meaning that we wish to do something for God, is that we should here think about what humans can actually do for God. Whatever that is must be something humans can contribute to God’s creation, that is, the world and the life on it. It is this thinking about how we can serve God, which is the appropriate reason for gathering on Sundays and doing what we are doing now. If we really want to do something useful for God, actual useful service for God and his creation, then what we do has to manifest itself in all of our life. It is certainly not restricted to these periods of contemplation in the Chapel. It must form the attitude we have towards the universe, the world and the life that is on it, and about how we treat the world and its life.
One of the things this means is what we read in the bible. We should love our neighbours as we love ourselves. The best service we can give God, or whatever you wish to call that creative power responsible for our being here, is to be truly human, humane, friendly to others and caring for the world and all life on it. We should employ our talents for the good of other humans, for the rest of life and for the sustainable future of the world on which we live. I believe that is the modern way of expressing what Jesus in his time called striving for the Kingdom of God. For the Temple Society such striving is our religion. And it provides the goal for all of our life at all times. On Sundays we take a pause and think about how well we are doing in our striving.
    Today I wish to discuss this topic, and today’s text fits this wish. But before I become too serious, let us all joyfully sing a hymn of joy. Let’s sing hymn Nr. 17 in our hymnbook ‘Brüder singt ein Lied der Freude’, Verses 1 - 4.


Our Text for this Sunday is from the gospel of Matthew Chapter 6: Verses 9- 13. This is part of the Sermon on the Mount and I’ll read from verse 7.
Read text. ‘ … The Lord’s prayer.’
 

    The gospel of Matthew is arranged in themes. Chapters 5, 6 and 7 are a collection of the teachings of Jesus. The beginning and the end of this set of chapters suggest that Jesus was talking to a crowd of people from a high point. That’s where the name Sermon on the Mount comes from. Matthew starts his next theme, healing and miracles, in the chapter that follows the Sermon on the Mount. When you read this text as part of the whole collection of teachings, it is clear that Jesus wanted a fundamental change from his listeners. Jesus called the result which such a fundamental change of attitude will achieve, and the behaviour of individuals and the society they will create, the Kingdom of God. Jesus felt strongly that God had given him the task of explaining this kingdom and inviting people to change so that they could achieve living under better conditions. As the radical change required is not easy, people would have to strive hard for it. What we should do is to forgive other people so that God will also forgive us. Choosing to serve God before Money is another part of the fundamental change required among people to achieve the kingdom of God. On a previous occasion, with the text Matthew Ch. 6, verses 19 to 24, I said similar things about a radical change because you cannot serve God and money. In this kingdom you must put serving God above thinking about money.
    Historians agree that the first gospel written was that of Mark. Perhaps 30 years later come Matthew and Luke, fairly close together. The gospel of John was later again by 20 to 30 years. Don’t hold me to the exact number of years. The only important matter is that the passage of time can reflect a changing story, if opinion about the heroes and exactly what they were did change as time went on. Mark’s gospel has few details about the death of Jesus and no details about his birth. In Mark Jesus resembled the sort of human which you and I could be if we were really taking a possible change in humanity very seriously and fought for it even if it cost our life. The teaching of a thoroughgoing change in attitude for people to achieve in this life, does not come over as strongly in Luke as in Matthew. Luke is already reflecting a changing trend of how Jesus should be seen and understood, which grew in Christianity after the death and resurrection of Jesus. This trend sees Jesus not as the man who taught great wisdom, but as the son of God who had to die on the cross so that those who believed could be saved in a future heaven. The kingdom of God has moved from the present to something which comes in the future and which you will enter if you believe that Jesus died for you. I personally believe that the way Jesus thought is expressed more accurately in Matthew. You will see why as my arguments develop.
    We all know that Jesus invited people to strive for and enter the Kingdom of God. In our text, the Lord’s prayer, which Jesus gave his disciples, it says: your kingdom come, your will be done on earth as in heaven. This is a very clear statement that the kingdom of God is to develop on this earth. What must happen for this kingdom of God to come to earth so that the will of God will be done on earth as well as in heaven?
    Time and time again Christians have thought about how they are to get into God’s kingdom. It seems to me that people would prefer that God himself, or Jesus, just brings the kingdom to earth and gives it to us. Then we would all join immediately, wouldn’t we?
    There have been many times in history when people believed that the present ugly world would end soon to be replaced by God’s glorious kingdom. Even in the time of Jesus, there were Jews who asked Jesus whether he was the promised messiah, whom all Jews had been waiting for for so long. I don’t think Jesus ever said that he was. As it happened, most Jews concluded that Jesus, however much of a stir he had caused, was not the expected messiah, and Jesus finished up dying on the cross instead.
    After the Easter events, when some disciples had become convinced that Jesus had been raised from death, the original Christian community in Jerusalem also had the expectation that Jesus would come down from heaven to institute the kingdom of God. In this community, people sold their goods, gave the money to the community and lived from day to day in the expectation that God’s kingdom would appear very soon. That is probably one reason why nothing was written down about the life and teaching of Jesus for 30 to 40 years after his death. Only after this time did the gospel writers try to reconstruct what had happened to Jesus and what he had taught. Some of the modern researchers I have read believe that Jesus himself, at least before his mission started to go wrong, believed that God would reward his work with the appearance of this kingdom. But, the fact is that God did not give the kingdom to the waiting people. And as you will see, the crux of what Jesus taught is that people must create the kingdom of God by their own efforts.
Even the founding of the Temple Society owes something to similar hopes that God would bring his kingdom. The pietists of Württemberg expected this to happen in 1832. Like all earlier such hopes, this expectation was also not fulfilled. Then, in 1848, came a revolution in Germany, which resulted in the formation of the first German national parliament. Christoph Hoffmann had earlier studied theology. He was concerned about the difficult situations in which many poor people in Germany lived and, when he was elected to this parliament, he hoped that something might now be done about the poverty in the land. But the parliament was not interested in such things and did not survive long. After these several failures to alleviate the lot of the poor, Christoph Hoffmann went back to a thorough search for the causes of the difficulties people were facing. The search included the bible and Hoffmann found his way back to Jesus, the man who had taught such wisdom, and who had actually shown us how the kingdom on earth can be brought about. In the community of people, all interested in putting the good of the community before their selfish needs, poverty disappears like all other things that are disharmonious and bad for community members. The answer was very clear and simple and had been there all along. But people had so far missed it in their wishful thinking that God would do the work.
    What is this clear and simple way that Jesus had laid out for attaining the kingdom of God? Read the Sermon on the Mount. It is there in all its simplicity. Humans, change yourself radically from looking out for your own selfish good, and use whatever talents you have for the welfare of all! Change your ways from hitting others back, to letting them hit you again. Forgive others, rather than take them to court. Achieve this attitude in all ways in which your natural selfishness can be replaced by your concern for the good of all. In biblical language it sounds slightly different. If someone hits you on one cheek, turn the other cheek and let him hit you there as well. In biblical shorthand the Kingdom of God appears when people follow the twin commandments: Love God with all your might, and love your neighbour as you love yourself.
    When you achieve this conversion in yourself, and when your friends do that too, then your little group has the beginning of the kingdom of God amongst you. Then let your example be like the sourdough, or the yeast, which finishes up affecting the whole loaf. If the people who interact with you are impressed by your example, your kingdom will grow and there is no reason why all of humanity should not change and enter this kingdom of God.
    It is through the sincere striving of people to make themselves better, that a better society will appear. Each person must undergo a thorough change in attitude and accompanying behaviour. There is nothing whatsoever preventing people from achieving such a change from which a more harmonious state of humanity will grow, other than their natural selfishness, greed, thirst for revenge and so on. In modern words you could say, Jesus invited us to change from the animal-like Homo sapiens to the true possibility of becoming humans “in the image of God” as the old bible writers put it. Because humans can think and plan, it is now possible for humanity to view the world as something precious, for which we must assume responsibility, and which we must not allow to be ruined by our laziness and thoughtlessness. With good will, we can arrange worldly things so that no one needs to remain in poverty. All of this is possible. It would be very sad, if we failed to get humanity to strive for and achieve this, just because it all seems too hard.
    The Temple Society has set this striving for true humanity as its religious goal. The striving starts by each individual changing his whole being from selfishness to being concerned with the welfare of the community. And the striving is an everyday matter. It is not reserved for Sundays, or religious meetings.
    We could perhaps think that all we Templers are doing is to make life hard and painful for ourselves. Why should I continually let strangers I come into contact with hit me on the other cheek as well. This really is a bad exaggeration of what the kingdom of God is. And what is more, it is quite a wrong picture.
    Think about it the other way round. What happens when you don’t strive for God’s kingdom, and when you don’t forgive others but insist on hitting them back. Then you have humanity as it exists today in many parts of the world, where the world really does seem very bad.
    Take a purely hypothetical example which we may be able to imagine. An old people’s home in which residents did not forgive each other their faults. Many of the things which can be considered faults are caused by the fact that the offending people are getting older and losing control over some of their bodily and mental abilities. At heart, they are not evil. By taking offence at the occurrence of such faults, other people only make their own lives difficult. Forgiving people their weaknesses rather than seeking to change them into what we want is the obvious way to remove the tension and aggression. Such a change from being offended by others to forgiving each other one’s weaknesses, is all it takes to recreate harmony and peace, in which all can live happily. This is a small example of how one achieves, through change in attitude, the kingdom of God within one’s community. It should be clear that the little bit of effort to change oneself produces a huge return in our quality of life. Our own old people’s home does make life very pleasant for its residents. We must all be very thankful for the way in which Dr. Schreiber and his staff and our own care worker, Helga Anderson, are facilitating the physical and care environment to allow such harmonious life to be retained among older Templers.
    Unfortunately, the situation is very much worse in the many parts of the world which we see every night when we watch TV. Our old home in Palestine, now called Israel, is a case in point. Let me say it without beating around the bush. Who is going to be the first Palestinian, or the first Israeli, to say to the other side: “Here is my other cheek, hit me again. I prefer that to hitting you back”?
    Most people will say: “This is an utterly ridiculous question. You cannot expect people not to revenge all the people the others have already killed. Once they have been revenged, then we can talk about peace”. You can see how difficult it is to stop fighting. And you can also appreciate the wisdom Jesus had when he proposed his remedy. Humans have the ability to forgive, start afresh and live in peace. Just do it!
    However, forgiving is very difficult and in our nature we are programmed to hit back and to revenge ourselves. But which is better? Can we swallow our pride, our thoughts of revenge, our loss of face and all the other things that seem important to us, and then sincerely forgive, or do we continue the revenge-first actions, which come to us so naturally?
    Clearly, forgiving is better, but, are we prepared to do it? Just hold this mental picture of warring and fighting, which most people expect to occur automatically, against forgiving, which is the wise thing to do. I think this comparison is the best way to understand what the bible writers meant when they described mankind as being made in God’s image, and thus, different from the other animals. Man is very much like other animals in defending its own selfish self or close family. But mankind also has the wisdom to see that strife could be banished. It is not impossible, just hard. And if true peace and harmony is what we want, we have to do the hard thing and forgive others, without spoiling it by taking revenge first. We need a thorough-going change of mind and we need to become happy with what it entails so that we can enjoy its consequences of peace and harmony.
    Have you noticed how the western civilization in which we live is orienting all its evaluation and decision-making on economic criteria? You expect commercial firms to do that. They strive to write a profit in black numbers in the bottom line. While they make a profit this is good for shareholders as well as for the workers. Unfortunately, we have so focussed on this bottom line that large firms, particularly multinationals, seem to make decisions in which concerns about people are lost in the need to make profits. One just closes those workplaces that are unprofitable.
    The situation has become worse in the last 15 years or so, as governments have used the same economic rationalism in their administration, as commercial corporations use in their commerce. Public services have been corporatised, often parcelled up and sold off in the process of privatisation. This process of making services private is supposed to make life better for us, because the commercial competition will make services cheaper for us than when they were run by governments.
    Have you noticed what this does to people. Whereas we used to be people or humans, we have now become consumers. Consumers are always expected to be selfish. Their quality of life increases when competition drives down the price of goods. We will benefit if our same amount of money can now buy more goods and services. All evaluation is in money. Even our welfare is measured in the goods money can buy. The happiness of people is now measured entirely by the mass of goods they can buy. Money rules. Mankind exists to consume material goods. God, the creator and his creation, have become lost from our sight and this goes along with the fact that science now explains everything from a material view and we don’t need God as a cause that affects our daily lives anymore.
    Here we have just merged two different aspects of the concept “God”. Science does explain most things from perfectly natural causes. We no longer need to invoke God to explain how clocks, TV sets, or living organisms work. Nature has natural causes, which we can learn to understand, just as the things we make have technical causes that work because we constructed them to work. But God as a shorthand name for the ultimate creative force, which is responsible for our being here, living on planet Earth in the solar system which is part of the universe, remains a very important idea. God, understood as the ultimate force, deserves our admiration, respect and thanks.
    With this qualification clearly understood, the present world view, in which man exists to serve money and thus his selfish self, is completely wrong. It is 180 degrees reversed from what human society could be. I am not a consumer. In fact, my parents raised me to be a saver, and I resent as a slur that I am seen only as a consumer and spender. I am a human person, a person with friends, and my happiness lies not in accumulating or spending money in consumption, but in the relationships I have with other people. And what I want is relationships of complete trust, honesty and friendship. What comes to mind is another piece of biblical wisdom. What does it profit a person if he or she gains the whole world and loses his or her soul. This saying describes a successful consumer, gaining the whole world, but losing his friends in the process. No, I want to keep my friends, my real friends, not the ones who surround me if I am rich. I hope that you think in the same way.
    What selfish consumers have not yet seen clearly is that if you are going to gain from cheaper and cheaper goods and services, costs have to be cut. This inevitably leads to lower quality. Clearly selfish consumerism can lead to a life of a very poor standard. And you have no guarantee that you will have any true friends.
    Herein lies the meaning of the Sermon on the Mount and the radical change in attitude it calls for. If you serve money, your values are selfish. You may become rich, even gain the whole world, but you are likely to lose all real friends in the process. To be a true human, you will be happier if you serve God. And as we saw earlier in this talk, serving God is really your striving to bring about the kingdom of God, here on earth to be shared by all people of similar mind. They will all be working to change conditions for the good of everyone, and maintaining a sustainable world, which provides a pleasant environment for us all and the rest of life. When people strive to the best of their talents and abilities to make the world better, there is no need for anyone to starve. Sensible community leadership exercised with goodwill towards all members can arrange food distribution appropriately. We should then have such harmony and peace amongst us that God, however you may picture this force in your mind, will be pleased to live among us. Let’s sing the song in which Christoph Hoffmann defined what our service to God should be.
We’ll sing from the Templer hymn Nr. 1 ‘Trachtet rufft ...’ the verses 1,2,4, 6 and 9.

    Can I leave you with a challenge. Do you think we Templers can interest our fellow Australians in the following: Truly humane people are happiest above all when they are among friends they can trust and when they work for the common good. The role of money and the economy should therefore be, to allow real humanity of this kind to be achieved by people. Can we provoke at least some discussion of these ideas. There are probably many people out there who are looking for such a comprehensive change of values.
 

Let’s finish with the Lord’s prayer, this time in the form we have chosen to print in our hymnbook.
Our Father in heaven,
Hallowed be Your name.
Your Kingdom come, Your will be done on earth as in heaven.
Give us today our daily bread.
Forgive us our sins, as we forgive those who sin against us.
Lead us when in temptation And deliver us from evil.
For the Kingdom, the power and the Glory are Yours forever.
Amen.

Return to the Top
 

Juli Saal in Bayswater
Elder Alfred Klink
Music Ingrid Lämmle/Ruff
Hymns “Lobe den Herren den mächtigen König...” No 64, Verse 1-4; “The Lord is my Shepherd...” No. 113, Verse 1 und 5; “Brüder singt ein Lied der Freude...” No 17, Verses 1, 2 & 3.

“Gottes Hoheit und die Würde des Menschen” ist die Überschrift von Psalm 8, dem Losungstext für heute. Hier wird der menschlichen Würde, und den zerbrechlichen Händen des Menschen, der ganze Horizont der Schöpfung anvertraut, damit er deren Harmonie und Schönheit bewahre, sie nutzt, ihr Geheimnisse erschließt und ihre Möglichkeiten entfaltet. Der Psalm steht im Alten Testament und ist dem Buch der Psalmen entnommen. Die Psalmen ist ein Buch, etwa in der Mitte der Bibel, in dem Lieder und Gedichte gesammelt sind und das in Inhalt sowie in Form zu den fünf dichterischen Bücher der Bibel gehört. Die anderen in dieser Gruppe sind: Das Buch Hiobs, Das Buch der Sprichwörter, Das Buch des Prediger Kohelet, und Das Hohelied. Längst bevor die Bibel in allgemeinen Gebrauch kam war die Sammlung der Psalmen als Gebetbuch (der Psalter) weit verbreitet. Psalter heißt man eine Serie von gefalteten Blättern (aus dem das originale Stralsund Gesangbuch wohl bestand) sowie als auch das altertümliche Instrument ähnlich einer Zither mit 8 Saiten, das zu den damaligen Zeiten das Singen von Psalmen oft begleitete. “Kommet zuhauf, Psalter und Harfe wacht auf...” sagt der Dichter in dem bekannten Lobelied.
Die Mehrzahl der Psalme (wie auch Psalm 8) stammen von König David, der ca. 1000 Jahre vor Christus lebte. Sie wurden oft vom Volk Israel gesungen, einige speziell zu besonderen Anlässen und Festen wo dann die Art der Darbietung (Instrumente und Stimmen) heute noch vorgeschrieben ist. Da das zweite Gebot ("Du sollst dir kein Bildnis machen") die darstellende Kunst innerhalb des Tempelbezirks verwehrt, wurden Poesie und Musik besonders gepflegt und die Psalmen dienten als kultische Gesänge im Tempel zu Jerusalem. Wie dort musiziert wurde, ist allerdings nicht überliefert. Mit oder ohne Instrumentalbegleitung, gemeinsam oder als Wechselgesang zwischen Gemeinde und Vorsänger – es bleibt viel Raum für Vermutungen.

Lasset uns jetzt die Lobe-Hymne singen “Lobet den Herren den mächtigen König der Ehren” Nummer 64 im roten Gesangbuch. Wir singen die Verse 1-4.

Während also die Musizierweise der Psalme im Dunkel der Geschichte bleibt, sind die poetisch bildhaften Texte bis heute erhalten. Insgesamt gibt es 150 Psalmen. Ihre herkömmliche Einteilung in fünf Bücher kommt daher, dass das Liederbuch mit dem Volk Israel und seiner Geschichte gewachsen ist und schließt sich äußerlich an die Fünf-Gliederung der Mosebücher an – Genesis bis Deuteronomium. Die fünf Bücher sind:
Psalm 1 - 41, hauptsächlich Gebete aus Davids "höheren" Jahren
Psalm 42 -72 dagegen überwiegend Psalmen aus Davids Jugend und seinem Kampf gegen Saul.
Dann kommen die Bücher von Psalm 73 - 89 und die von Psalm 90 - 106
und zuletzt das fünfte Buch mit Psalm 107 -150 mit Wallfahrtslieder, Festlieder, Predigt und Lob.
Bis auf das fünfte Buch der Psalmen, endet jedes Buch mit dem Vers: "Gelobt sei der Herr, der Gott Israels von Ewigkeit zu Ewigkeit! Amen". Psalm 150 (am Ende des fünften Buches) ist der Schlusspunkt und endet darum mit: "Alles was Odem hat, lobe den Herrn! Halleluja!" Die Psalmen lassen sich aber auch nach ihrem Inhalt gefühlsmäßig in verschiedene Gruppen einteilen. Wie zum Beispiel die Gruppe der Bußpsalmen, Schöpfungspsalmen, Wallfahrtspsalmen, usw.
Das ordnende Prinzip der Psalmen selbst ist nicht der Reim, sondern - charakteristisch für die hebräische Literatur - die zumeist zweigliedrige Gestaltung der Verse. So wird die Aufforderung im Psalm 103, "Lobe den Herrn, meine Seele" in der zweiten Vershälfte bekräftigt mit: "und was in mir ist, seinen heiligen Namen". Oder in Psalm acht, der beginnt mit “Herr unser Herrscher! Groß ist dein Ruhm auf der ganzen Erde!” wird bekräftigt mit “Der Glanz deiner Hoheit überstrahlt den Himmel;” und “Deine Macht ist unermesslich”. Neben der Bestätigung können folgende Vers-teile auch Fortführungen oder Gegensätze beinhalten, wie Psalm 23 zeigt: "Und walĺ ich auch im Todesschattentale, so fürchte ich kein Unglück..." Oder wieder in acht, “Wie klein ist da der Mensch! Und doch gibst du dich mit ihm ab”. Die Benutzung von Gegensätzen betont die Extremen und steigert das Mitfühlen der Hörer. Sprachlich eindrucksvoll ist auch der stufenartige Parallelismus wie im Psalm 93, bei dem einzelne Worte beibehalten werden während die Verse einen Gedanken weiterentwickeln.
"Mächtig ist das Brüllen des Meeres,
Mächtiger noch sind seine Wellen,
Doch am Mächtigsten, Herr im Himmel, bist du!"

Als geistliche Lieder des Volkes Israels schildern die Psalme selten Vorgänge des realen Lebens, sondern meist Eindrücke und Gefühle, die sich aus jenen ergeben. Sie bauen auf menschliche Grunderfahrungen wie Jubel, Trauer und Verzweiflung in der Hinwendung zu Gott. – Zorn und Hass bilden da keine Ausnahme, wie Psalm 137 zeigt: "O du verstörte Tochter Babels: Heil dem, der dir vergelten wird, was du an uns verübst!" So sangen die Juden im babylonischen Exil (oder im Gedenken an diese Zeit). Da gibt es Loblieder und Gebete in schwerer Not, Vertrauen auf Gott und Dank nach der Rettung, Wallfahrtslieder und Festliturgien, Lehrgedichte vom richtigen Leben sowie Zionslieder und Lieder des Königs und vom Ende der Gottesfeinde.
In den Psalmen reden Menschen ganz direkt mit Gott. Sie danken Gott dafür, dass es ihnen gut geht und loben die Macht und die Größe Gottes. Anderseits steht in den Psalmen auch sehr viel über Leid, das Menschen erlebt haben und es im Gebet vor Gott bringen; aber auch, wie sie trotz der Not Gottes Hilfe erfahren haben. Oft wechselt die Stimmung mitten im Psalm. Am Anfang hört man dann zum Beispiel viel über Leid das einen Mensch bedrückt, und mitten im Psalm wendet sich die Stimmung und der Autor des Psalms beschreibt wie sich seine Situation durch die Hilfe Gottes verändert hat. So ist in den Psalmen eine Vielzahl von menschlichen Gedanken und Gefühle enthalten die selbst heutzutage, im Spannungsfeld zwischen natürlicher Evolution und christlichem Glauben, dazu anleiten in schwierigen Situationen auf Gott zu vertrauen.

Die christliche Kirche griff die Lob- und Klagelieder ihrer jüdischen Umgebung auf; Psalmverse oder ganze Psalmen wurden Bestandteile der frühchristlichen Gottesdienstordnungen (Liturgien). Dies gilt auch für die Cantica, Gesänge außerhalb des Psalters, die aber inhaltlich und formal den Psalmen gleichzustellen sind (wie das Magnifikat, der "Lobgesang der Maria" in Lukas 1, 46 - 55).
Während der weiteren Geschichte der christlichen Kirche hatten die Psalmen immer eine besondere Rolle, als private Glaubensäußerung einerseits und im Gottesdienst andererseits. Der Reformator Calvin, der den wachsenden Einfluss der weltlichen Musik in der Kirche fürchtete, schrieb über die Psalmen: "Darum, wir mögen suchen wo wir wollen, wir werden keine besseren und dazu geeigneteren Lieder finden als die Psalme Davids, die der Heilige Geist eingegeben und gemacht hat." Daraus zog er allerdings den Schluss, dass ausschließlich Psalme geeignet seien im Gottesdienst gesungen zu werden. Johannes Calvin hatte, als Nachfolger Luthers in der Reformation, mit seiner strengen Bibel Auslegung großen Einfluss auf die Entfaltung der neuen Christenheit. Viel der heutigen Antichristlichen Bewegung ist mehr gegen Calvins Gospel, das “Institute der Christlichen Religion” gerichtet als gegen das Christentum selbst.
Interessant in dem Zusammenhang ist hier ein Vergleich der drei führenden Gestalten der Reformation, wie die Nachwelt sie sieht: Da ist einmal Martin Luther, der deutsche Glaubensschwärmer von Wittenberg, dann der heterodox Andersdenkende Schweizer Huldreich Zwingli von Zürich, und am ende Johannes Calvin, der orthodox rechtgläubige Franzose von Genf.
Der kürzeste Psalm ist Psalm 117 mit nur zwei Versen und der längste Psalm 119 mit 170. Zu den bekanntesten Psalmen gehört wohl der Psalm 23 „Der Herr ist mein Hirte“. Ein wundersamer Psalm, der schon viele Menschen in schwierigen Situationen getröstet hat:
Du Herr bist mein Hirt, darum kenne ich keine Not. Du bringst mich auf saftige Weiden, lässt mich ruhen am frischen Wasser und gibst mir neue Kraft. Auf sicheren Wegen leitest du mich, dafür bürgst du mit deinem Nahmen. Und geht es auch durchs dunkle Tal - ich habe keine Angst! Du Herr bist bei mir; du schützest mich und führest mich, das macht mir Mut. Vor den Augen meiner Feinde deckst du mir deinen Tisch; als Gast nimmst du mich bei dir auf und füllst mir den Becher randvoll. Deine Güte und Liebe umgeben mich an allen kommenden Tagen; in deinem Haus darf ich nun bleiben mein Leben lang.

Lasst uns doch diesen Psalm jetzt singen, Nummer 113 im roten Gesangbuch. Ich weiß, er steht da nur in Englisch; wenn das Ihnen ein Problem ist dann summen Sie halt nur mit; es ist so eine schöne Melodie. Wir singen die Verse 1 und 5.

Es ist schön wenn man so Glauben kann. Aber ob so oder anders, alle Menschen glauben irgendwie. Glauben ist eine Gottes-Gabe die jedem Menschen gegeben ist und von der Jeder auf seine Art Gebrauch macht, oft ohne dass er es weiß. Glauben ist eine Notwendigkeit ohne die das Leben undenkbar wäre. Es gibt kein Wissen, keine Gewissheit und keine Weisheit die nicht irgendwie oder irgendwo vom Glauben oder seiner Schwester, die Hoffnung, getragen wird. Sie sind es, die uns in einer unsteten und gefahrvollen Welt die Zuversicht leihen zum täglichen Leben. Und doch (vielleicht eben deshalb) ist der Glaube oder das Glauben eine schwer zu beschreibende Eigenschaft. Nicht nur weil das Wort selbst mehrerlei Auslegungen hat, so wie glauben – im Gegensatz zu Wissen, glauben – als in es ist möglich, Glauben – wie in Bekenntnis, und Glauben – als Vertrauen, sondern weil unsere ganze Lebensphilosophie, einschließlich des Gemeinschaftssinns darauf aufgebaut ist. Wir glauben mit der Sicherheit langer Erfahrung dass die Sonne morgen wieder aufgehen wird und Mond und Sterne sich um uns drehen; fast ohne Bedenken wagen wir uns mit unserem Auto auf die Straße im festen Glauben dass die anderen Autofahrer das Rechte tun werden; und wir glauben liebend gern der seligmachenden Verheißung in dem Psalm von vorher. Ohne vertrauensvolles Glauben in die Würde des Mitmenschen käme keine Gemeinde zu Stande. Der Glaube, oder das Glauben, ist das Fundament auf dem unsere Weltphilosophie aufgebaut ist. – Mit Vorliebe beschäftige ich mich mit Physik und Astronomie. Mein Bruder Theodor in München schickte mir unlängst eine CD mit Vorträgen von der Münchener Universität über Kosmologie und einer davon war über die Suche nach den kleinsten theoretischen Bestandteilen des Universums, die Erreger der Schwerkraft, der Gravität. Seit 400 Jahren kennen wir ihre Gesetze. Seit 100 Jahren wissen wir von ihrer Verwandtschaft mit Raum und Zeit und können diese Wirkungen berechnen. Jedoch der Ursprung, die Quelle, die Wiege der Gravitation, die Universalkraft die sowohl den Apfel vom Baum fallen lässt als den Mond in seiner Bahn um die Erde führt, ist immer noch in Vermutungen verschleiert und vom Glauben, dass wir es einmal wissen werden, getragen. Vor etwa 30 Jahren hat ein junger Engländer eine Theorie aufgestellt nach der bestimmte Grundeigenschaften des Schwerkraftträgers gemessen werden könnten. Zu der Zeit schien es unmöglich diese Messungen je zu machen, da die nötige Energie dazu die Grenzen des Wirklichen weit überstieg. Doch der Glaube, dass die natürliche Entwicklung und der menschliche Wissensdrang eines Tages einen Weg finden wird, bestand. Und heute wird in der Schweiz am Fuße der Alpen von der Europäischen Kommission ein 26km Durchmesser Gerät eröffnet, das speziell zu dem Zweck gebaut wurde dem Ursprung der Schwerkraft näher zu kommen. Natürlich kostet das viel Geld, und zwar so viel Geld dass es den Amerikanern, die etwa zur gleichen Zeit solch einen Super Zyklotron zu bauen anfingen, zu viel wurde und sie es aufgaben. Sie verloren den Glauben daran. Wer weiß, vielleicht wäre das Soziale Kapital dieses Projekts in Amerika der Menschheit von größerem Nutzen geworden als mit Geldesmacht die Kultur anderer Völker zu zerstören.

Es ist nicht leicht Mensch zu sein. Wir müssen mit dem Bewusstsein von Furcht und Sterblichkeit fertig werden. Aber das gerade ist es, das uns Menschen aus den Kreaturen dieser Erde hervorhebt, was uns die Möglichkeit der Macht und Würde (von der Psalm 8 spricht) gibt Mensch zu sein. Ich denke Gott hat uns in der Entwicklung des Lebens die Würde und den Verstand gegeben die eventuellen Folgen unseres Tun und Handeln voraus-zu-ahnen, und ich sehe es als eine Sünde diese Gabe nicht in dem Grad indem sie jedem gegeben ist voll auszunützen. Wir stehen in Ehrfurcht (wie Psalm acht so schön sagt) und bestaunen den Himmel, die Sonne, den Mond und Sterne auf ihren Bahnen. Wir schauen in das Dunkel der Nacht und spüren in ihr die Unendlichkeit des Kosmos; und wir fühlen dass unser Sein einen Sinn haben muss der in dieser Welt erfüllt sein will. Als Mensch kann man nicht bloß einfach vor sich hin leben wie ein Kartoffelstock. Mensch sein verpflichtet. Man hat Verantwortung für sich, seine Mitmenschen und seine Umwelt. Der Glaube der allein selig macht hat für mich immer irgend eine Art der Ausrede in sich: Ich bin nicht schuldig, ich kann nichts dafür, es kommt doch wie es will, warum soll ich mir Sorgen machen, wenn ich nichts tue mach ich nichts falsch. – Religiöser Glaube wird oft gepredigt als effektiver Schutz gegen das Feuer der Furcht, und wird dann bald zum Schild im Kampf gegen Lebenswandel und eine ungewisse Zukunft. Aber Sicherheit und Gewissheit sind Schatten-Illusionen die im Licht der Evolution zerrinnen. Wenn künstlich erhalten, können sie leicht ausarten in Überhebung und Gräueltaten. In meiner Suche nach Worten zum Thema Psalm 8 kam ich, wie schon vorher erwähnt, auf Johannes Calvin und seine Zeit in Genf. Calvin brachte seine strengen Glaubensgesetze und religiöse Sicherheit von Frankreich mit sich, und in den ersten fünf Jahren seiner Amtszeit in Genf starben unter seiner Anweisung 54 Personen auf dem Scheiterhaufen. Das kann keine gesunde Religion sein. Eine gesunde Religion muss sich in ihrer Fassung und ihrem Streben den praktischen Umwelt Verhältnissen anpassen können; muss suchen dürfen, wachsen, offen und fröhlich sein, und in diesem Glauben die weltliche Entwicklung steuern.

Nun, “Brüder singt ein Lied der Freude...” Nummer 17 im roten Buch, die Verse 1, 2 & 3.

Ich will mit dem Psalm 8 diesen Saals schließen. Wie es bei Liedern die den Schöpfer lobpreisen oft der Fall ist, beginnt und endet Psalm 8 mit einem feierlichen Antiphon an den Herrn, dessen Herrlichkeit sich über das Universum ausbreitet. Papst Paul VI gab 1969 dieses Lied, das die Wunder der Natur und die Würde des Menschen in Gottes Namen preist, den ersten Mondfahrern mit auf ihre Reise zum Mond mit den folgenden Worten: “Der Mensch erscheint uns hier im Mittelpunkt dieses Unternehmens als Gigant. Er offenbart sich uns als göttlich, nicht von sich aus, aber in seinem Ursprung und seiner Bestimmung. Dem Menschen, seiner Würde, seinem Geist und seinem Leben gebühret Ehre”.

Und dieser irdische Gruß an eine neue Welt im All lautet so:

Herr unser Herrscher! Groß ist dein Ruhm auf der ganzen Erde!
Der Glanz deiner Hoheit überstrahlt den Himmel. Deine Macht ist unermesslich;
aus dem Lob deines geschlagenen Volkes baust du eine Mauer
an der deine Widersacher und Feinde zu Fall kommen.
Ich bestaune den Himmel den du gemacht hast, Mond und Sterne auf ihren Bahnen:
Wie klein ist da der Mensch! Und doch gibst du dich mit ihm ab.
Ja, du hast ihm Macht und Würde verliehen; es fehlt nicht viel und er wäre wie du.
Du hast ihn zum Herrscher gemacht über deine Geschöpfe, alles hast du ihm unterstellt:
Die Schafe, Ziegen und Rinder, das Wild und die Vögel, die Fische und Ungeheuer im Meer.
Herr, unser Herrscher! Groß ist dein Ruhm auf der ganzen Erde.

Musik

Vielen Dank, Ingrid, für die Musik. Mein Dank der unsichtbaren Hand die den Raum mit Blumen geschmückt hat, und ein liebes Dankeschön euch allen die ihr diese besinnliche Stunde mit mir geteilt habt. Ich wünsch euch noch einen schönen Sonntag.

Return to the top
 

Founding Day Service - Bentleigh 26th June 2005
Elder Theo Richter

Good morning to you all, and welcome to our Founding Day Service on this beautiful sunny day. After the gloriously unseasonal weather that we have been enjoying, who would believe that it's already winter?
As we sit here in our Community Hall in Bentleigh, it is perhaps right that we choose a time each year to think about and reflect on the role the Temple Society has in our lives. This weekend marks the day in our calendar that has been chosen to do just that - to celebrate the founding of the Temple Society in Kirschenharthof in Germany in 1861, some 144 years ago.
In his book "The Holy Land Called", Dr Paul Sauer records the following poignant words:
'During the Assembly at the Kirschenharthof on the 19th and 20th of June, 1861, the Friends of Jerusalem accepted the consequences of their religious convictions. They declared themselves to be an independent religious society under the name of the "German Temple". In a document drawn up..., they made the following declaration: "In view of the general disorientation of mankind caused by the fact that none of the existing churches aspires to making man into a Temple of God and to establish the sanctum of Jerusalem for all nations, we, the undersigned, dissociate ourselves from Babylon, that is to say, the existing churches and sects, and unite to establish the German Temple to carry out the Law, the Gospel and the Prophesy.'
The signing of this declaration served two purposes for the former members of the Friends of Jerusalem. In their renunciation of the doctrines and creeds of the mainstream churches, they confirmed their right to follow a life of free Christian religious belief unhindered by the need to conform to a secular model of worship. In addition, this declaration set them on a path in search of Gods Kingdom on earth where they embraced and accepted the physical and spiritual consequences of self-excommunication and, in doing so, forged a path back to the simplicity and beauty of individual communion with God.

I have chosen as our hymn today, the very traditional "Trachtet! ruft mit ernstem Worte", "Seek ye first of all God's Kingdom". It is number 1 in our Hymnbook and we shall sing verses 1, 2 and 3.

Our text today is taken from Luke 13, verses 18 and 19 and it reads as follows:
Now he began teaching them again about the Kingdom of God: 'What is the Kingdom like?' he asked. "How can I illustrate it? It is like a tiny mustard seed planted in a garden: soon it grows into a tall bush, and the birds live among its branches.'

To understand what drove our forefathers to take the formal step of breaking away, we need to examine what society offered in the late 18th century. Germany was in the grip of severe poverty caused in part by a self-centred, greedy and feudalistic landlord society, and in part by the ever-expanding influence of capitalism and the agricultural and industrial revolutions. The sheer scope and volume of change encroached on the everyday life of even the remotest and poorest farmer. Whole communities were depressed and exploited by the triumvirate of ruling classes, church and state with an indifference that belied the positions of trust care and duty that these bodies represented.
The Church in those times found it hard to adjust to the changed ways. Steeped in a history of rigid celebration of the Christian faith and largely removed from its congregations, it could no longer respond to the utter hopelessness and suffering that had befallen its spiritual charges.
People who had previously been assured a life in the footsteps of what had gone before suddenly found themselves looking away to the cities for work and home. The subsequent exodus from the land to the city caused hardships that had not been seen in a long time - overcrowding, poverty, poor sanitation and hygiene.
Against this backdrop of pain and misery was formed one of the most all-encompassing revolutions in spiritual thinking. It is not by coincidence that Europe saw several new spheres of theological endeavour spring from this well of social discontent. People questioned the 'divinity' of churches who promised Gods salvation whilst at the same time stood by and watched on as their children sickened and died through malnutrition and disease. More poignantly, the total lack of response and charity shown by the church represented a fall back to the old ways of blight and indifference characterised by the worst excesses of ancient Babylon.
As in physics, wherever a vacuum exists, something will come along that fills it. Bound by the common threads of genuine love and concern for fellow men, sects and societies outside the mainstream churches started to form that had, as their central aim, the common goal of religious and social reform. Jointly, they would agitate and cajole the ruling bodies, seeking to force them out of their languid state of sloth and 'laissez-faire' and into state of action and concern for social and religious justice.
Out of this backdrop of discontent sprung the Pietist movement and ultimately, the founding group of the Temple Society, the Friends of Jerusalem. Along with many others, Christoff Hoffmann became disaffected with the lot cast for the common man. His profound belief was that Christianity was a concept of action rather than benign contemplation. He saw that real, lasting change would not come of its own accord through argument and debate, but rather through actively seeking and living the Scripture that sought to reunite mankind with God's divinity.
Along with other like-minded believers, Hoffmann sought to create a community that was based on a profound belief in and love of God and of fellow man. In such a community could men coexist and conduct themselves in true harmony, displaying a faith focussed on honest endeavour and the will to bring God's word into every component of community life. And, by living in such a community, the destiny and faith of its adherents was taken away from organisations and returned into their own hands. With this, the Friends of Jerusalem reaffirmed the words of Paul in his letter to the Ephesians:
"Now you are no longer strangers to God and foreigners to heaven, but you are members of God's own family, citizens of God's country, and you belong in God's household with every other Christian.
What a foundation you stand on now: the apostles and the prophets: and the cornerstone of the building is Jesus Christ himself! We who believe are carefully joined together with Christ as parts of a beautiful, constantly growing temple for God. And you also are joined with him and with each other by the Spirit, and are part of this dwelling place of God."
From these roots spring the Temple Society as we know it today. Its very inception rose from a need that was not catered for by the mainstream churches of the day - namely the need for man to be closer to his God.
In the front cover of our Templer Record are the words taken from Matthew 6:33, which express the goal toward which strive: "Set your mind on God's kingdom and his justice before everything else, and all the rest will come to you as well". In these words we confirm the attainment of God's kingdom on earth as our foremost desire.
But what does this desire mean to each of us? How does it mould the way we react with society and with each other?
I have often asked myself the question, 'What sets us apart from other religious groups?' Our search for God's divine love is not, in itself, unique. Our desire for His kingdom on earth is also not isolated.
I think one of the greatest difference between Templers and other religious groups is our tolerance of others beliefs. We comfortably accept people into our fold who have travelled different paths and who have come from a variety of divergent beliefs. The only stipulation we have is best summed up in our booklet 'The Temple Society - an overview", which states:
"He is a Christian and welcome in the Temple Society who professes as his chief aim, the realisation of the Gospel of Jesus and of Gods kingdom of love. Acknowledgment of various doctrines and the observance of outward forms,… alone are far from sufficient. It is meaningless to merely piously cry 'Lord, Lord!' Rather, Christian endeavour needs to reflect the words of Jesus: 'Whoever does the will of God is my brother, my sister, my mother.'
That which allows us to accept as we do comes fundamentally from our belief in the Commandment set down by God "Love the Lord your God with all your heart. That is the greatest Commandment. The second is to love your neighbour as yourself." To carry out these words requires a great deal of self-sacrifice. Without doubt, it is very easy to exist as an egoist and to always ask; "What can I get out of this situation?' It is far more difficult an endeavour to always ask; "How can I contribute to this situation?"
At the very core of our belief, lie the words and actions of Jesus. He sought to show mankind that there is love and guidance, and by adhering to God's most basic principles, mankind can live in peace and harmony.
Perhaps the best illustration of this comes in those words from Paul to the Ephesians. If we truly believe that the Temple of God dwells within us, then our whole outlook and interaction with each other is tempered with the divine love and tolerance that Jesus sought to teach us. Further, if we truly believe that we form the united cornerstone of God's Temple, then the faith and trust that we demand of ourselves can also be demanded from those who surround us.
To have a community that exists upon this founding principle is to be part of one entity, and the love, trust and faith in each member of that entity builds manyfold, to attract others outside that community toward it.
To go without creed, doctrine or dogma can be a frightening thing because it launches each of us on a lone journey in search of our own truth. This is a choice that we, as parts of that Temple of God, make. It is not to set us apart from other men but rather, that our love of God and of one another can be free and open without constraint. This is part of the reason why we accept people of divergent faith into our society. A true sign of Christian fellowship is to show tolerance and respect for another's views and to offer support and understanding to all men.
In living this belief, we follow in the footsteps of Jesus. He was sent amongst men to show them how to halt their pious indifference to the pain and suffering of their fellow man. His task was to open up the channel between God and mankind that had been slowly choked off by the restrictions imposed by the doctrine and creeds of the church. In effect, these were restrictions imposed by mankind on mankind and were not of God's making.
In many ways, we too are charged with opening this channel between God and ourselves. Though our belief asks us to accept that God dwells within us, this is still a very difficult concept to realise. The path that we tread is a lonely one because the only true guidance that we can call on stems from within ourselves. It makes no difference what we are told to believe, or even if others do the believing for us. In the end, it is only when we realise that a truth has been revealed to us that we can accept that truth as part of our faith and find the inner peace that comes with understanding.
In our text today, we read "It is like a tiny mustard seed planted in a garden: soon it grows into a tall bush, and the birds live among its branches." It is a simple message - that from very small seeds does the mustard plant grow.
Until yesterday, I had absolutely no knowledge - nor did I consider it a gap in my education - of what a mustard plant looks like. I looked it up and found three very interesting points. The first is that the mustard seed is counted amongst the smallest seeds in the plant world. The second is that this seed becomes a spindly plant that can reach a height exceeding 3 metres. The third is that, in the right conditions, it can grow very rapidly and can reach this height in less than a year - truely a very remarkable plant.
So what is our text trying to tell us? Jesus used the mustard seed as an example of what enormous potential there was if mankind could somehow cross back onto the path that led to God's door. The analogy of the tiny seed springing into a tall bush was an analogy that demonstarted the power of God's truth. Jesus sought to show his listeners that, although they were just starting out on their journey toward that truth, once on the path, their understanding and reward would flourish and grow far out of proportion to their small beginnings.
God says that we should trust in him and, in so doing, he will lead us to his kingdom. To do so, we must set aside our fear of failure, our need to conform and our desire to compare. Jesus taught us that love will open our hearts to God. It is with this love, that we also open our hearts to his divine guidance.
Our world today is a far cry from that of the original Templers on the Kirschenharthof in Germany. They realised the goal of setting up Christian communities in Palestine where they lived in peace for a while, pursuing the dream to live in the Holy Land, acting out the desire to form a society that truly lived by the principles of God's word. With the coming of war, they were forced to leave, ultimately to reassemble across two continents - one community in Germany, the other here in Australia.
Some of our members were still born in Palestine and have first hand experience of living that dream as reality. For others of us, it is a life that our parents or grandparents lived in a place far removed from our own reality. The one element that binds all of these generations is our common search for God's kingdom, and the legacy of the spirit and faith of those early Templers is still reflected in the form and function of our Society today.
As I said before, today we celebrate the founding of our Society. Above my head hangs a simple cross bearing the letters INRI - Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews. This is the only outward symbol in this whole room that proclaims it to be a meeting place for a community of believers in the Templer faith. The simplicity of this cross, and of the whole hall, bears out the intent of those original Templers - the goods and chattels of the whole world cannot improve on or even assist in our communion with God.

I think we should all join now in prayer. Please be upstanding and join me as we recite the Lord’s Prayer.

Our Father in heaven,
Hallowed be your name,
Your Kingdom come,
Your will be done on earth as in heaven.
Give us today our daily bread.
Forgive us our sins, as we forgive those who sin against us.
Lead us when in temptation and deliver us from evil.
For the Kingdom, the power and the glory are yours forever.
Amen.

I recently attended a training seminar about creative thinking and was reminded again of how you can find thought-provoking gems in the strangest of places. There would not be many amongst us that have not heard of Theodor Seuss Geisel, better known as Dr Seuss, the creator of the 'Cat in the Hat' series of children's books. For some obscure reason during the session, the instructor was making a point and he reminded us of one of the rhymes in one of the books. It goes like this:
"If you always do what you always did, you will always get what you always got."
That set me to thinking about the changes that are part of the Community Building activities undertaken in recent years and it is perhaps a fitting time - in today's Founding Day Service - to make mention of these activities.
What the Cat in the Hat was saying to his audience was simply that if you want to make a change in something, then you have to change what you are doing. This applies in our times more than ever before as the Temple Society enters its next phase of development.
The Community Building work has been a major part in the lives of the many people on the working parties - our friends and acquaintances - people who are and continue to be prepared to devote a significant part of their time and energy into creating our new reality. The output from this work has culminated in the plan for a structure that will take the Temple Society into the future.
By its very nature, this is not a simple undertaking. Apart from the planning, the discussion and the myriad of other activities, talk of restructure creates a feeling of instability and change that is unsettling at the very least. Coupled with unfamiliar language and a level of general insecurity in our greater community, it is little wonder that people are unsure of where our community is headed.
This not withstanding, what is certain is that when comes the time; we need to be prepared to make those decisions that will allow our community to continue to grow and prosper. And we need not always agree in the exact direction that the community is headed. What is important is that we agree on the general direction.
We are a group of people who are bound by similar goals and to achieve them we need to take steps that will build on what we were, and that will move us boldly into the future. What we require now is great self-belief, a core of inner strength, and a desire to achieve that sense of community that transcends the individual.
Though I fear that some changes will not be exactly what I desire, I also know that a lot of great friends and fellow Templers are thinking and planning and looking for the solutions that will steer our Community into an uncertain future. And I know that with faith hope and confidence, we will find the right path.

Let us then close this service with the three more verses from our hymn "Trachtet! ruft mit ernstem Worte", "Seek ye first of all God's Kingdom". I remind you that it is number 1 in our Hymnbook and we shall sing verses 7, 9 and 10.
(Notice about Expedition?)
(Collection will be donated to the Melbourne City Mission)
I find that writing a service is always a great way for me to crystallise and focus my beliefs. I thank you all for once again allowing me to share my thoughts. May I wish you all a pleasant and enjoyable Sunday.
(Please feel free to join in refreshments at the rear of the hall).

Return to the top

 

 Service in Bayswater 5 June
Elder, Mark Herrmann

Monika Strasser – opening music

For the character Morell, in his play Candida, George Bernard Shaw wrote: “We have no more right to consume happiness without producing it than to consume wealth without producing it.”

Good morning, my name is Mark Herrmann – an Elder of the Temple Society Australia – and I welcome you all to today’s service on this [crisp/wet] wintry morning.

I extend a very warm welcome to a special group of young people – our 2005 confirmands – who have joined us for this morning’s service as part of their confirmation program. This year’s program began on the evening before Sommerfest (back in March) with an information session presented by the teaching Elders and attended by the prospective confirmands and their parents. The formal lessons began last month with a visit to the farm of Bernhard and Karin Lubitz near Leongatha where, in the presence of Temple Society President Peter Lange, these eager teenagers – as one step towards adulthood – embarked on their shared journey to a better understanding of life and religion in general and the Temple Society in particular. The Lubitz’s hospitality (and barbecue lunch) was warmly appreciated, as was the generosity (and warm soup) evident at the conclusion to a subsequent session at the home of Alfred and Ursula Klink. Here, the confirmands were able to view the night sky and various heavenly bodies through powerful telescopes, thus giving them a broader perspective of their place in our universe. To the Lubitz’s and the Klink’s we say a hearty thank-you. We hope it is experiences such as these (and not just the tasty food) that will leave a lasting impression on our young charges.

The attendance of our confirmands today is not intended as passive observers, but rather as active participants. For the benefit of the congregation, and to enhance their sense of belonging to our community, I now invite them to individually stand and clearly identify themselves (perhaps together with the names of their parents – so as to assist you in placing them correctly). Thank you. Apart from those present today, we also have Sam Lingham – son of Rod and Christa Lingham living in the Wimmera region of country Victoria – and Michael Schulz – son of Gary Schulz and Nicola Collier-Jackson living in Brisbane – both taking part from afar. Jessica and Rebecca Beilharz, daughters of Dieter and Wendy Beilharz from Lang Lang, are helping their dad celebrate his birthday today. By the way, the confirmation program will incorporate a weekend residential camp in the city during the upcoming school holidays, and culminate in the confirmation service here in the Community Chapel on Sunday the 14th of August. The teaching Elders – Rolf Beilharz, Herta Uhlherr, Harald Ruff, Renate Weber, Renate Beilharz and I – view the coming months with enthusiasm and excitement, wrapped in a sense of togetherness and achievement. We hope that the confirmands share at least some of our interest. They will have the opportunity to contribute more specifically a little later in the service.

Hymn (89) – “Pass it on” (all 3 verses)

We sing of experiencing God’s love and spreading it to those around us. To me, the hymn simply but effectively encapsulates the twin commandments of love – love God and love your neighbour as yourself – as expressed in the Gospel of Matthew Chapter 22, Verses 37-39. Of course, our concept of and relationship with God is a deeply personal and individual one, whereas our place in and association with our community can strongly impact on all facets of our life. It is for this reason I regularly proclaim: share in our community, for together we achieve.

As I indicated earlier, through the possibilities of modern technology, we can link in with our distant confirmands enabling them to participate in the program despite being many kilometres away. In our proposed new community structure (all members should have received their information packages recently – and there is an information and discussion session planned to follow the service today) there is specific provision for contact with our members living further afield through the intended Welfare & Distant Focus Group. Naturally, there is nothing quite like attending an event or function in person, to allow maximum interaction with others. But I feel one of the pluses of the Temple Society is the sense of community attainable irrespective of one’s closeness to Bayswater or Bentleigh. Back in my teaching days, I was stationed a long way from Melbourne and thereby learnt to assimilate with and adapt to a rural environment. My relationship with the Temple Society was altered, with significantly less direct contact, but I never felt disassociated or unconnected. There was always the monthly Templer Record providing much information and food for thought to look forward to. My visits to Melbourne, although less frequent, were even more rewarding and provided the challenges of maintaining fellowship. And, like a good book or favourite piece of music, it is quite remarkable how one manages to return over and over again, feeling one can simply continue where one last left off. My connectedness to and with the Temple Society travels with me and is not confined to particular locations or specific occasions. A few years ago, as part of the local Knox Interfaith Group, Renate Beilharz and I presented a profile of the TSA for the multi-denominational audience. It was the Group’s chairman, a Catholic, who suggested our faith represented a philosophy of religion.

Where do our confirmands see themselves in, say, 10 or 20 years’ time and what, if any, involvement will they have within the Temple Society? Given this time period probably seems like a life sentence or at least a world away to them at present, I’ll leave this as a rhetorical question, the answer to which can be but one of supposition. You can probably imagine my hopes in this direction, which are shared by the teaching Elders and, I suspect, many if not all of you here today. But, that is ultimately a matter for our young people to think about and determine for themselves. We can show them, discuss with them, even mould them to some extent, but ultimately the decision will be theirs for the making. Nonetheless, the confirmation experience is one that creates a special bond, provides space for individual and group development and many shared moments.

I am no longer a teenager. I was confirmed at age 15, back in 1973 or, as my daughter would say, the “olden days”. What can I remember of Sunday mornings driving to Boronia with Dr Richard Hoffmann in his old Austin? Well, there was the obligatory crossing of the Dandenong railway line at Huntingdale, the then new bridge on North Road only serving to create a detour as Dr Hoffmann first went over and then back under the bridge – he obviously shared an affinity with that railway crossing – before the suburbs gave way to some rural aspects atop Wheelers Hill. Of the lessons themselves, sadly, I must confess I can remember next to nothing. Was it all too long ago, was there too much distraction beckoning from outside the windows, was the requirement to sit and listen for two – or was it three – hours at a time simply beyond the capabilities of this particular teenager? As one of the teaching Elders today I can only hope the present confirmands are able to retain more of their Confirmation program for future reference and reflection.

Samuel Clemens – author of the classics Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn under his pen name of Mark Twain – is credited with saying: (quote) “When I was younger I could remember anything whether it happened or not.” (unquote) I think I can relate to that, although for quite different reasons than being ‘young’.

Who would want to be a young person today? We experience many different phases over our lifetime and, ideally, would like to feel settled and comfortable with our position in each. Sure, I wish I could still run as fast and as far as I once could, or spot a few darker strands of hair on my head, or…, but there are new things I am learning every day and other things I would simply not have been capable of at a younger age. Everything has its place and time. Quite frankly, I’m not sure I would want to be a young person today.

What do our confirmands think about such things?

Public questions (words projected on wall)

What do you hope to gain from the confirmation program?
What do you want to do in the future?
What is good (or not so good) about being a teenager today?

(Invite the confirmands to individually respond to some or all of these questions)

Song – Mary Black – “Bless the Road” written by Steve Cooney (words projected on wall)

Remember when we walked on hills of heather
Singing weaving mystical rings
Now in a while my precious child
You will unfurl your wings
And I’ll have lost what I believed
Had promised everything
But before you go my friend, my kind companion
Listen to this song I sing

Then go in peace and grow in grace in goodness
Know that you have nothing to fear
Any dry your eyes my little one
And let there be no tears
Send me a dream from way beyond
I promise I shall hear
Oh beautiful beloved soul companion
Thank you for those beautiful years

And heaven hold and watch your way forever
May your every dream come true
Forgive all wrong, always be strong
And do what you must do
You stand before this open door
And you must now go through
My precious friend, my own my sweet companion
Bless the road that carries you

Indeed, we wish all of our 19 confirmands, as individuals and as a group, a blessed path on their life’s journey.

The Bible text allocated to today’s service is from Mark’s Gospel: Chapter 5, Verses 21-34. In the Contemporary English Version: The Bible for Today – as used by the confirmands – it reads:
“Once again Jesus got into the boat and crossed … and you’ll no longer be in pain.”

The background for this story is from the Old Testament Book of Leviticus where, in Chapter 15, Verse 25 it says: “Any woman who has a flow of blood outside her regular monthly period is unclean until it stops, just as she is during her monthly period.” The woman had lived for twelve years with a menstrual flow that could not be stopped. And because of the Levitical laws to which she was subject, it had many repercussions beyond just the medical condition. Throughout this twelve-year span the woman was isolated from people too, others staying away to avoid ritual contamination.

The Bible account begins with an appeal by a man of high station. A large crowd surrounded Jesus, an important teacher, as he heard the appeal of Jairus and responded with compassion. They hurried off as quickly as the crowd would permit important men on an urgent mission. Then there was the interruption as the woman’s story intervened.

Verse 34 concludes with Jesus saying to the woman: “You are healed, and you’ll no longer be in pain.” The word “healed” is the Greek word sozo. It means healing in the ordinary sense in which medicines and doctors and processes of nature will heal illness over time. But it is also the word used for salvation, and we therefore need the context to tell us which is meant in each particular case. Clearly in the first case, in verse 28, the woman hoped to be healed of a medical condition, and she felt in her body she was healed of her affliction. The question that translators have difficulty with, though, is whether Jesus used this word the same way in verse 34 when saying: “You’re well now because of your faith.”

What should we make of the woman’s difficulty? First of all, she had a debilitating physical sickness. She must certainly have been anaemic, weakened by the continued blood loss. She had appealed to doctors for help, but they couldn’t help her, and the condition was getting worse. The problems went beyond her physical suffering, however. Twelve years is a long time to be sick. Her emotional condition must have been desperate as well. We can also imagine that, because she was considered unclean, she was isolated from family members who wanted to avoid contamination. Finally, she had spent all her money, so not only was she sick, but she was poor.

I am not a woman and, furthermore, have never suffered a sickness or physical illness that has lasted more than a relatively short span of time. How, then, can I begin to comprehend the woman’s broken heart, her bitterness and frustration, her questions, confusion and the dark memories that had plagued her for so long? It is clear that I cannot realistically put myself into her situation. Do I, or in fact can I, therefore blindly accept – that is, believe – the woman’s healing was as a consequence of her faith? I truly struggle with this concept of belief. Is this the way we are supposed to measure our faith?

The healing power of Jesus and his performing of miracles are well documented in the Gospels. How do we relate to Jesus – as a man or as God or, indeed, as both? In the Temple Society Religious Perspective booklet it says: (quote) “Contrary to the present teaching of many other Christian denominations, Jesus is, to us, a human being, divinely inspired and as close to God as very few others, if any, have been.” (unquote) I am at ease with this explanation as I can focus my attention on his teaching, on his deeds and words, using them as a sound basis for the way I endeavour to conduct myself in life. The perception of religion – formally defined as belief in a supernatural being, thing or principle and man’s relationship with the supernatural – sits far less comfortably with me. I recognise the very personal thinking we may all have in this regard, and certainly do not deny anyone their particular belief and their right to it. All I can do is tell it the way it appears to me.

Whether we believe in the story from Mark as a miracle brought about through the strength of the woman’s faith or not … is a matter for each individual to decide. Personally, I find it a struggle to grasp stories I cannot relate to. Perhaps my faith is not strong enough, however we measure such a thing. Despite this, there are two aspects of the woman’s story I wish to focus on.

Firstly, the quick response of Jesus to the woman’s plight was to act with compassion and to help, despite the urgent errand he was on. Are we similarly always mindful of those around us … our family, our neighbour, our work colleague, our community member … in need? How receptive are we to others reaching out for help? Despite our own wants and desires, we can learn to be more aware of what goes on in the hearts, minds and lives of the people we come into contact with. We can strive to be more tender, more caring, more expectant, more compassionate, more understanding …

Perhaps it is too much to expect us all to continually seek out such occasions to assist. I think it is probably enough to be ready and able to respond when and as we best can. Our objective may be to learn to think as Jesus does.

Secondly, I believe there is significance that the high-status man – Jairus – was not preferred over the marginalised woman. In fact, other chapters of Mark describe miracles featuring a man, a woman and a child. Everyone has a place, a right to belong and a right to be heard.
Does this not point to the importance of all in society? Do we not all have a part to play? To me, it is natural for us all to desire significance and respect for who we are, what we do and how we achieve it. Similarly, within the Templer Community – a group of like-minded people striving for a common aim – there is an ever-strong reliance on the input and striving of the individual. We are all significant and it is important to respect and value the contributions of all associated with the Temple Society. We all have talents, skills and areas of expertise to offer, to contribute and to enable others to benefit from. With this in mind, the proposed new TSA structure – with its emphasis on focus groups – allows for people with specific interest and abilities to apply them in related areas.

Naturally, the success, or otherwise, of the venture will be finding sufficient people prepared to contribute. This has always been a requirement of our community, one that has always had a healthy response, and the requirement is no less critical now. Our community depends, not only on plenty of willing human resources, but also on their ability to get on with one another and work together for the common good. Our backyard is presently home to two rabbits, one cat and three recently-arrived egg-laying hens. And while they each have their own space, there are times when they generally mingle and therefore need to cooperate. Throw in a couple of adults and three children – the lizard is presently indoors hibernating, and the recipe for teamwork becomes even more challenging!

As in a family, our Templer community comprises all types and it definitely takes all types for it to prosper.

Hymn (114) – “Send your servant” (all 6 verses)

Let us pray:
(from Age cartoonist Michael Leunig’s book “When I talk to you”)

Dear God
We loosen our grip. We open our hand. We are accepting. In our empty hand we feel the shape of simple eternity. It nestles there. We hold it gently. We are accepting.

We are also accepting of our confirmands as they progress down their road of learning, experiencing, asking, deciding and as they strengthen their bonds of friendship with each other and within their group.
Amen

Thanks to all – music (Monika Strasser), setting up (Renate and Tony Beilharz), flowers donated by Fritz Hoefer and arranged by Trudi Murray/Heidrun Messner. The collection this morning will be put towards the Salvation Army Red Shield Appeal.

Monika Strasser – closing music

I have a small confession to make.
The opening excerpt from George Bernard Shaw’s play was not presented in its entirety. The handsome, confident, brilliant and powerful public speaker, Pastor James Morell, is challenged for his beautiful and beloved wife, Candida, by the young, shy, unworldly, ineffectual poet, Eugene Marchbanks. And, apparently, it’s the fight of his life!

Morell begins … “We have no more right to consume happiness without producing it than to consume wealth without producing it” before concluding … “Get a wife like my Candida and you’ll always be in arrear with your repayment.”

The information session on the TSA’s new constitution, structure and upcoming Extra-ordinary General Meeting follows after light refreshments in the fellowship area and presents another opportunity to be accepting – thank you for listening this morning, and I wish you a very pleasant Sunday.

Return to the Top


Saal - Bentleigh - 22.5.05
Elder Rolf Beilharz

Welcome everyone!
Hymn: We’ll begin by singing the hymn Nr. 17 Brüder singt ein Lied der Freude. We’ll sing the 4 verses
Sing Hymn

As this is a Saal service which people have been invited to discuss afterwards, I want to raise the question what is truth, and what can we honestly say we believe? Such a discussion should help us define our Templer Religion in the 21st century. What follows are my thoughts and I make no claims that you should think in the same way as I do. I hope we will have a discussion in which others have their say, and I look forward to hearing your reactions.

There are three parts to my talk. The first is about the bible text and the parts of the gospels which follow. What do they tell us?

The second is about what we can say about what or who God is.

The third is an attempt to draw, from the first two parts, some conclusions, which are relevant to our Templer Religion today.

Our text for today is Mark 14: verses 3 - 9.
Read the text (Jesus is anointed with expensive oil)

This text describes a symbolic gesture. Jesus is anointed before his death. This text introduces the events which then lead to the crucifixion of Jesus. Reading on from this text, Mark discusses the following items.

Judas Iscariot goes to the chief priests to betray Jesus. They promise him money and Judas starts to look for an opportunity to betray him.

Then follows the last meal Jesus has in the company of the disciples, the Passover meal. Jesus says the bread is his body and the wine is his blood. In the garden of Gethsemany Jesus prays for God to take this cup (his coming death) from him, but, let God’s will be done not mine.

After this Judas appears, kisses Jesus (the signal that this was the man to be taken) and Jesus is arrested. Jesus is led away to the high priest’s house where he is charged with many things none of which seems to stand up until the high priest asks: ‘are you the messiah, the Son of the Blessed One?’ Jesus says ‘I am and you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of the Almighty and coming with the clouds of heaven’. The chief priest calls this blasphemy, and it becomes the reason why the Jewish priests, etc. find him guilty and the excuse for putting him to death. After being tormented, Jesus is taken to Pilate, the Roman Governor.

Pilate does not believe Jesus has done anything worth being put to death for. But the Jews cry out for the death of Jesus, rather than that of the murderer Barrabas. Pilate seems to give in to the mob, lets Barrabas go free and orders Jesus to be crucified. He is put on the cross at about 9 o’clock in the morning. At 12 midday a darkness descends on the area, presumably an eclipse of the sun, which lasts three hours and he dies shortly after 3 o’clock in the afternoon. The centurion in charge says ‘this man must have been a son of God’.

A number of women are present, watching from a distance. Mary of Magdala, Mary the mother of James the younger and Joses, and Salome are named. When evening comes (it is the day before Sabbath) Joseph of Arimathaea, a respected member of Council asks for the body. Pilate is surprised that Jesus has already died and checks with the centurion. Reassured, he gives the body to Joseph who wraps the body in a linen sheet and puts it in a tomb cut out of rock and rolls a big stone against the entrance. The three women watch and see where the body is laid. Then follows the Sabbath.

On the day after Sabbath the three women buy aromatic oils to anoint him. Just after sunrise they come to the tomb, wondering who would move the stone to let them get to the body. They find the stone already rolled back and they see a young man wearing a white robe sitting on the right side. He says to them: ‘Do not be afraid, you are looking for Jesus of Nazareth who has been crucified. Look there is the place where they laid him.’ But go and say to his disciples and to Peter: ‘He is going ahead of you into Galilee: there you will see him, as he has told you.’

The next verse is Ch. 16 v. 8 and I’ll quote directly from the bible: Then they went out and ran away from the tomb, trembling with amazement. They said nothing to anyone for they were afraid.

This sounds like the end of a story. In fact, there is in the revised English bible a footnote about this verse 8 which says: at this point some of the most ancient witnesses bring the book to a close. This bible has a further unnumbered paragraph and then 11 more verses with what we now take to be the normal ending for Mark’s gospel.

The unnumbered paragraph seems to be a short summary : ‘And they delivered all these instructions briefly to Peter and his companions. Afterwards Jesus himself sent out by them, from east to west, the sacred and imperishable message of eternal salvation.’

The verses 9 - 19 bring more details. On that first morning Jesus appeared first to Mary of Magdala. She carried the news to his mourning followers who did not believe her. Later he appeared in a different form to two disciples while they were walking in the country. They were also not believed. Later he appeared to the eleven seated at table and reproached them for not believing. Then he told them to take the gospel to the whole creation. Those who believe it and receive baptism will be saved; those who do not believe will be condemned. Faith will bring miracles (driving out demons, speaking in strange tongues, poisonous snakes will not harm them, the sick they lay their hands on will recover). After talking with them the Lord Jesus was taken up into heaven and took his seat at the right hand of God, while the disciples went out to proclaim his message far and wide, with Jesus confirming their words by the miracles that followed.

Let’s take a pause and think about what we have just heard here about the end of the gospel of Mark. Note, Mark’s gospel is recognised by all theologians and historians as the oldest, the first, of the gospels to have been written. But even this gospel was written about thirty years after Jesus died. If this first gospel actually did end originally with Ch. 16 verse 8, where the women ran from the tomb and told nobody what they had seen, then the story describes events that could have happened to any normal human in those cruel times when crucifixion was common. Today’s text, where Jesus called his anointing with expensive oil an action which all followers of Christianity will remember, his answer “yes’ to the question whether he was the Messiah, and his’ saying that the bread was his body and the wine was his blood, are the only three things I might query. These statements do express symbols that became important in later history.

The fact that summaries of the actions of the disciples, which eventually led to the formation of Christianity, were added to the end of Mark’s gospel suggests that the bible is a record of a growing story, to which details keep being added over time as the story grows. The gospel of Mark has few details suggesting that Jesus is anything other than a normal human. What does a comparison of the details here in Mark with the details in later gospels tell us? Matthew and Luke were the next gospels and John was written much later again.

In Matthew, the high priests offered to give Judas 30 pieces of silver, rather than merely money for the betrayal of Jesus. Otherwise the details are remarkably similar until the words at the last supper. Jesus now says about the wine: ‘Drink from it, all of you. For this is my blood, the blood of the covenant, shed for the many for the forgiveness of sins.’ Also there are now two bandits crucified with Jesus, who taunted him like the soldiers. At the moment that Jesus died, the curtain of the Temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth shook, rocks split and many graves were opened and many of God’s saints were raised from sleep and, coming out of their graves after his resurrection, entered the holy city where many saw them.

Also, on the day after the day of preparation, that is on the Sabbath itself, the chief priests and the Pharisees came to Pilate and asked him for a guard to ensure that the disciples would not steal the body from the grave. Pilate gave them the guard.

On the next day, the day after Sabbath when Mary of Magdala and the other Mary came to look at the grave, suddenly there was a violent earthquake; an angel of the Lord descended from heaven and rolled the stone away and sat on it. He told them that Jesus had been raised, and to tell the disciples. On their way Jesus greeted them, they came up and clasped his feet, kneeling before him.

While the women were on their way, some of the guard reported to the chief priests everything that had happened. After meeting with the elders, the chief priests offered the soldiers a substantial bribe to say ; ‘His disciples came during the night and stole the body while we were asleep. They took the money and their story became widely known and is still current in Jewish circles to this day (that is, when the gospel was written). Matthew is the only gospel to mention the guard at the grave as well as the mighty physical disturbances of the earth at the moment Jesus died.

Still in Matthew, on a mountain in Galilee the resurrected Jesus told his disciples that full authority had been given to him. The gospel ends like this: ‘Go therefore to all nations and make them my disciples; baptize them in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, and teach them to observe all that I have commanded you. I will be with you always, to the end of time.’

Clearly the story had developed significantly by the time Matthew was written. What does Luke tell us?

One detail, found only in Luke, is that Pilate turned over Jesus to King Herod because Galilee was under Herod’s jurisdiction. And at the crucifixion one of the 2 criminals crucified with Jesus taunts him while the other defends Jesus and asks him to remember him. Jesus promises him that he will be with Jesus in Paradise before the day is over.

At the tomb when the women were looking for the body there were now two angels. There are also now more details about the two disciples who saw Jesus while walking in the country. One was Cleopas and they were walking to Emmaus about 7 miles from Jerusalem. They reached Emmaus as evening fell and they asked Jesus to stay with them. As they sat at table Jesus broke the bread, and it was at this point that they recognised him and he vanished. They rushed back to Jerusalem and told the others that Jesus had appeared to them. Jesus then appeared among them. He showed them his hands and his feet, and ate a fish they had cooked, to convince them that he was Jesus. He explained to them ‘that scripture foretells the sufferings of the Messiah and his rising from the dead on the third day. He also declares that repentance in his name, which leads to forgiveness of sins, is to be proclaimed to all nations beginning from Jerusalem. You are to be the witnesses to it all. I am sending you the gift promised by my father; wait in this city until you are armed with power from above.
Then he led them out as far as Bethany, and blessed them with uplifted hands; and in the act of blessing he parted from them. And they returned full of joy, and spent all their time in the temple praising God.

The gospel of John has quite a different structure to the three others. Here is the beginning, about Jesus.

‘In the beginning the Word already was. The Word was in God’s presence, and what God was, the Word was. He was with God at the beginning, and through him all things came into being. In him was life, and that life was the light of mankind. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has never mastered it.’

These were the first 5 verses of Ch. 1. Verse 14 is: ‘So the word became flesh; he made his home among us, and we saw his glory, such glory as befits the Father’s only Son, full of grace and truth.

This only Son, Jesus, is no longer just a human! He is now that part of God in which you must believe to be saved. We have now arrived at the details which have become so important in orthodox Christianity and which church members must believe to fully become saved Christians.

There is a very strong emphasis on the fact that Jesus is the way through which people will find God. There is a further detail about the authority of the gospel of John, which has always intrigued me. It concerns a special young disciple whom Jesus loved, standing with the women during the crucifixion.

On the day after the Sabbath Mary of Magdala came to the tomb and found that the stone had been moved from the entrance. She ran to Simon Peter and the young disciple whom Jesus loved. These two ran to the tomb. The young disciple got there first, peered into the tomb and saw the linen wrappings lying there, but he did not enter. Simon Peter entered first. The young disciple then also entered and he believed. Until then they had not understood the scriptures, which showed that the messiah must rise from the dead. After the disciples went away Mary of Magdala saw two angels in the tomb and as she turned around she saw Jesus who asked her why she was crying. When he spoke her name, Mary, she recognised him. She told the disciples. Jesus appeared to the disciples several times more and he blew the Holy Spirit into them during one of these visits.

John’s gospel ends with a discussion about whether the special young disciple would die before Jesus returned for his second coming, and then goes on:
‘It is the same disciple who vouches for what has been written here. He it is who wrote it, and we know that his testimony is true.
There is much else that Jesus did. If it were all recorded in detail, I suppose the world could not hold the books that would be written.’

What has intrigued me is why this gospel needed this special appeal to its being true? Was the growing story now so different that it needed special backing for the truth of its content?

For the purpose of this talk I ask, what is true in these stories? Which can I take to be historic events containing the wisdom of Jesus the teacher from Nazareth and which are the additions by others, well-wishing Christians, who have kept on adding to the story?

To me, it seems that from the original verbally transmitted memories about the teacher Jesus of Nazareth (a normal human), a story has grown with more and more added details. As the story grew, a very significant change occurred.

Initially there was the teacher and his teaching, about how humans must behave to achieve the kingdom of God (which is already here and all we need is to change our ways to enter it). As time passed Jesus, the human teacher, became Jesus, the Messiah, about whom many predictions had been made in the scriptures. More and more the actions and words of Jesus reflect those symbols that had been prophesied, and Jesus became the unique Son of God, a sacrificial lamb, through whom the world would be freed from sin.

You don’t have to believe me. Read the bible and draw your own conclusions. I promise you that the second and third parts of this talk are much shorter.

Let’s now sing the Hymn Nr. 33 Gib die Weisheit meiner Seele (all 4 verses).

The second part of my talk raises the question: What can we say about who or what God is?

Most people probably start their answer by accepting that God either exists, or doesn’t exist, and they then argue why. Often people will see three possibilities: they are believers (religious persons), or atheists (non-religious persons believing there is no God) or those that can’t make up their mind (agnostics). I think this is the wrong place to start”. Starting here already includes some very important assumptions. Try this:

It is people who think! Can you imagine cats or sparrows discussing whether God exists or not? No!
Thinking and speaking animals are found only in children’s books where these animals are treated as if they were humans.

So far as we know only humans, once they are beyond childhood, can sensibly ask and discuss whether God exists. In fact, only humans can have symbols or pictures in their minds and words to give names to the pictures in their mind. This fact allows people to agree, e.g. that a hard piece of earth is called a rock and that it will hurt you if you kick it with bare feet. Note that everything I have just said is only possible because we all agree on what the words I used mean (earth, rock, hurt, kick, bare, and feet). We are so used to using words that we find it hard to imagine what it is like to be an animal which cannot put names to the things in its environment.

OK, where does this take us? Let’s ask a blunt question. Would there be a God if there were no thinking beings, say in that situation on earth before humans had evolved, perhaps when the dinosaurs roamed the earth?

From our present point of view we can say that whatever the situation is now, must also have been the situation earlier in the earth’s history. But at that time, no one would have been asking these questions.

If you agree with me then we can go on to say the following. Essentially we humans, because we can think, are asking questions about the facts of our existence, what the earth is, what life is, what the universe is, how the universe started, how the earth fits into the universe, why is there life on earth, and so on.

These days we think of such questions as belonging to science. What does that have to do with religion?

When did science as we know it start? Within these last 500 years. In that time science separated from religion, because the people who were finding out that the earth went around the sun, rather than the earth being the middle of creation, were punished and expelled from the church. The church had all power and what it said ‘had to be true’.

Twothousand years ago and earlier there was no science opposing, or separate from, religion. The bible expresses ideas about how the universe was created. The world was the only part of the universe that people knew anything about. On earth anything that is made has a maker, so it was reasonable to assume that the earth must have had a maker too. The bible describes God, the creator, as a mature, thoughtful and wise man, who was pleased with what he had created.

What we now call religious scriptures were explanations of ideas about how a creator created the universe. In those days there was one important bit, the earth we lived on, and other things like large lights, the sun and moon, as well as many little lights to separate light from darkness. These explanations were not classified into science or religion. Science and religion were the same thing - accepted knowledge about the universe humans lived in.

If you still agree with me, we can say thinking humans created God, the creator, in the same way as, more recently in science, humans have proposed theories about a big bang, black holes and other features of the universe that most of us have trouble understanding.

I am not belittling the founders of religion, nor the theories about the big bang and black holes. The Jews of the old Testament wisely said that we should not make pictures, or images, of the creator. If we accept that we will never be able to truly describe the cause of the start of the universe and how this happened, most of the problems about whether there is a God or not should disappear. The God about which religion and science seem to be in conflict is a construction of human minds. Naturally the God of 3000 years ago is different from the God of 500 years ago or the ‘Ultimate Force’ of today. Whether God exists or not, cannot be answered unless you define which image of God you are talking about. And that is what the wise ancients advised us not to do.

So, humans have created God when they defined what God is. This God will differ between different people. To me this has become a pointless discussion, which in my opinion we should not pursue further. Note that I am not denying that something was involved in the beginning of the universe . We should all be thankful that we are alive and respect whatever the cause of life is. But I don’t think it is useful for us to fight over the definition of whatever this is.

We now come to the third part of the talk. What can we conclude from the facts in the two earlier parts? And how do the conclusions influence modern Templer Religion.

In my opinion, and please note that this need not be your opinion, there was historically, about 2000 years ago, a Jewish teacher called Jesus of Nazareth travelling through Jewish regions including Jerusalem. He was probably executed in Jerusalem, possibly because his teaching had aroused great interest which may have threatened the position of the upper classes of Judaism.

I don’t think that we know any specific words Jesus said. But there seems to be a consistency within his teaching about how people should behave towards each other, to achieve living in peace with each other, and potentially even with their enemies. Jesus used the name Kingdom of God for this state of people living in peace, goodwill and trust. He also said, you people can achieve this now, here on this earth, by changing your attitude from being selfish to placing the common good above that of the individual. There is no need for any supernatural act.

What I call common sense today leads me to the same conclusion. I much prefer living in peace with Iraqis, Russians, Americans and everyone else, than having to continually plan how I can avoid, and defend myself from, being attacked by all these foreigners. In the body of knowledge associated with Jesus there are specific examples of human behaviour which convince me. If I get into a scuffle, I will be better off not revenging myself by hitting back, but rather by letting me be hit once more. If I am known to be peaceful and helpful, most people will not want to harm me. So, I think the world would be better off when people understand and are willing to live according to what I think are the original teachings of Jesus. This is what the Templer Motto asks us Templers to do. I believe this is still important, possibly more than ever before, to our world. The least we Templers can do is to keep this idea alive and to live according to it.

It seems that 2000 years ago the Jewish people were expecting a rescuer from their oppression. Their prophets had suggested a saviour, the Messiah, would appear. People must have asked Jesus whether he was the Messiah. Unfortunately, the concern with whether Jesus was the Messiah became more important than what Jesus taught. His disciples said he was the Messiah, while the opposing Jews said he was not. The Christian church, which grew out of the efforts of disciples and other apostles, emphasised that Jesus was the Messiah and eventually, part of God. This dogma pushed aside his own common-sense teaching about living in peace with others. I believe strongly that the modern Templer faith is to return to the common-sense original teaching of Jesus and tell the world that people can live at peace with all others, when they overcome their inherent selfishness and allow others to have the same chances they themselves wish to have. (This is, of course, the practical part of the twin commandment of love, or the golden rule).

We’ll finish with the Lord’s Prayer. Please stand, if this is no trouble.

Our Father in heaven,
Hallowed be Your name.
Your Kingdom come,
Your will be done on earth as in heaven.
Give us today our daily bread.
Forgive us our sins, as we forgive those who sin against us.
Lead us when in temptation and deliver us from evil.
For the Kingdom, the power and the Glory Are Yours forever.
Amen.

Note that, not defining the creator of the universe does not prevent us being inspired by the beauty inherent in the universe itself and expressing our respect for this creation.

So, let’s conclude this service by singing Hymn Nr. 126 ‘Wie groß ist des Allmächt’gen Güte’ verses 1,2 and 4.

Sing hymn.

Postlude played by Ingrid Lämmle-Ruff.

Wish the congregation a happy community afternoon with coffee and cakes.

For those wishing to discuss what I said we will put some chairs in this corner and start the discussion when participants have had sufficient coffee.

Elder: Rolf Beilharz

Return to the top


Mother’s Day Service

Bayswater Community Chapel
8th May 2005

Elder: Renate Beilharz
Pianist: Veronika Frank

Songs: Thank you for giving me the morning
This is the day
It is a good thing to give thanks
One family

Bible text: 1 Cor 12:4-11
Readings: My Grandma – the saint Phillip Gulley
Various other sayings about Mothers and motherhood

Welcome to today’s Mother’s Day service, a celebration of mothers and mothering, a celebration of life. We will start by singing song number 116 – This is the day and Love life and live. We’ll sing all three verses.

At the Kids Club camp, I invited the children, with the help of their fathers, to complete a booklet called ‘Why Mother deserves a party’ in preparation for today’s service. Did anyone want to share their ideas with the rest of the community? Are there any other ideas on why mother or maybe Oma deserves a party?

I like to think of Mother’s Day as a big Thank you party for Mothers right across society. Before the Sunday School children leave for a special party activity, let’s sing the thank you song ‘Thank you for giving me the morning. Song number 21 in the hymnbook. We will sing verses number 1, 2 and 4, then the two verses screened on the wall.

I’ve deliberately created today’s service as a happy celebration, and not just to interest, or involve the children, but because everyone needs time to celebrate life, to say thank you and enjoy the pleasure of being happy with a community of friends. While I hope to maintain a light hearted atmosphere, I do trust that I will be able to give all food for thought to take away, and time for reflection and contemplation.

As we heard from the children, mothers have many great qualities and that there are lots of aspects to mothering. These virtues are not just exclusively the prerogative or ability of mothers. Mother’s Day can be a very inclusive day, not an exclusive one.

There are quite a few different versions of where the tradition of Mother’s Day comes from, some dating back to pagan rituals of spring time, while others take a theological tack and use biblical references. There is one that I like, because it fits in with the ideas that Mother’s day is a celebration for all people. I found it on the BBC internet site, under religion and ethics. It goes like this:

Most Sundays in the year churchgoers in England worship at their nearest parish or ‘daughter church’.

Centuries ago it was considered important for people to return to their home or ‘mother’ church once a year. So each year in the middle of Lent, everyone would visit their ‘mother’ church, or the main church or cathedral of the area.

Inevitably the return to the ‘mother’ church became an occasion for family reunions when children who were working away returned home. (It was quite common in those days for children to leave home for work once they were ten years old.)

And most historians think that it was the return to the ‘mother’ church which led to the tradition of children, particularly those working as domestic servants, or as apprentices, being given the day off to visit their mother or family.

As they walked along the country lanes, children would pick wild flowers or violets to take to church or give to their mother as a small gift.
www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/christianity/features/mday/ 

This version of where the mother’s day tradition comes from is quite inclusive, it does not just focus on mother, rather the whole family and community as a mother to which to come back to.

No one should feel excluded from mother’s day because they are not a mother. Mother’s Day can be a celebration for whole families and communities rejoicing in nurturing our children, and nurturing our adults. I say adults purposely, because our need for mothering or nurturing never stops. Most people, males and females, take on mother and mothering-roles in lives of others, children and adults, even if it is only for a short period of time. Every one of us, has a mothering element in us.

God, while usually depicted or referred to as a he, in all his/her aspects has a strong mothering element. Tom, Lisa, Kate & Ingrid will present a humorous funny story about God and his own children. The story came to me while I was recently in Germany. It was headed Good for a chuckle and was written to Those of us who have children in our lives whether they are our own, grandchildren, nieces, nephew, friends or students. I hope you all get a chuckle out of this.

Whenever your children are out of control, you can take comfort from the thought that even God’s omnipotence did not extend to His own children. After creating heaven and earth, God created Adam and Eve. And the first thing he said was
“DON’T”
“Don’t what?” Adam replied.
“Don’t eat the forbidden fruit.” God said.
“Forbidden fruit? We have forbidden fruit? Hey Eve…we have forbidden fruit!!!!”
“NO WAY!”
“Yes way”
“Do NOT eat the fruit!” said God.
“Why”
“Because I am your Father and I said so!” God replied, wondering why he hadn’t stopped creation after making the elephants. A few minutes later, God saw His children having an apple break and He was angry!
“Didn’t I tell you not to eat the fruit?” God asked.
“Uh huh,” Adam replied.
“Then why did you?” said the Father.
“I don’t know,” said Eve.
“She started it!” Adam said
“Did not!”
“Did too!”
“DID NOT!”
Having had it with the two of them, God’s punishment was that Adam and Eve should have children of their own, Thus the pattern was set and it has never changed.

But there is reassurance in the story! If you have persistently and lovingly tried to give children wisdom and they haven’t taken it, don’t be so hard on yourself. If God had trouble raising children, what makes you think it would be a piece of cake for you?

Thanks everyone. Yes, we all get a laugh out of this type of story, because we can relate to them so well. And the end message is comforting: Don’t worry about your not so perfect children, and I’d like to take it the next step, focus on the positive aspects of your kids instead of the negative.

But, like all of these wise little sayings, it is more easily said than done. When I write letters to relatives overseas, I have to force myself to concentrate on the achievements of the children, instead of what they have done to annoy me recently. Negative things come to mind too easily. It is easy to be negative about the kids, or about anything in life. So easy to be negative, focus on what is not good, what is not happening, what I can’t do, instead of what I can do.

I am currently reading a book called Motherguilt by Ita Buttrose and Penny Adams. They write today’s mother are suffering from an epidemic of guilt…Mother guilt can make even the most competent woman doubt her mothering ability. It slinks into her life when she least expects it and anything and everything can cause an outbreak. (end quote).
The book goes on to chapters and chapters of examples of mother guilt, which I must admit became rather depressing, so I skipped to the end, so see if there was a happy ending (I always do that with any book) and there was a happy ending. The important message that I got out of the book goes for everyone, not just mothers. Ita and Penny explain that the best way of teaching children is through example, and being a stressed out supermum is not the best example for children. Instead, they say, we should learn to be happy and content with our activities and be relaxed and comfortable with ourselves, loving ourselves, not just the children. We should not feel guilty, rather develop a stronger sense of self-esteem. We don’t have to be perfect mothers, perfect anything, just good examples.

That’s one reason why I wanted today to be a positive happy experience for myself, and hopefully, for all of you, to help me focus on the pleasures of children, not the frustrations and dissatisfactions.

A great example of positive thinking is my mother, Heidi Vollmer – she is such a great role model for me, my sisters and brothers and the many others with whom she comes into contact. Heidi has been in hospital for over 7 weeks after an accident that left her with multiple injuries. She is looking at more weeks before she will be fit enough to come home. Despite this, she is always positive. Her improvement has been in tiny steps, but frustration has not set in. From the start, Heidi tried to do as much for herself as possible, not expecting the nurses to be at her beck and call for every little need. She is not moaning or complaining about her slow progress, though she is now enjoying the fact that in hydrotherapy she is able to ‘walk’ again in water. Heidi doesn’t hide the fact that she has pain, she’s not being a martyr, but her overall attitude is a lesson for us all. Accidents happen, she doesn’t want to apportion blame, hold grudges or make others feel guilty. This is her special gift that I never appreciated until now, when I see her tied to a hospital bed or wheelchair, not being able to be her active, involved self.

Before we have a look at today’s bible text, let us sing song number 52, It is a good thing to give thanks. It’s a short song, so we’ll sing it twice.

Today’s text talks about every individual having their own special gift. We can’t all have the perfect mothering or parenting skills, nor do we all have the ability to be patient in adversity, but we all have our special strengths. That is the message in today’s bible text, which comes from 1 Corinthians, chapter 12 verses 4 – 11.

There are varieties of activity, but in all of them the same God is active writes Paul to the Corinthians All these gifts are the activity of one.

This text reminds us that we are all part of a whole, the whole of life, of God. I don’t mean the God of the story we had earlier: the father figure in a beard who sits in heaven watching our behaviour, the humanised God. I mean God, the spirit, the divine spark that is in each one of us, as temples of God.

There’s a well known Jewish proverb that goes God could not be everywhere so he made mothers. The sentiment expressed by these words is lovely, that a mother’s love is a great as Gods love for us. But I have difficulty with the saying, because I believe that there can be no mother without God, without God’s spirit dwelling in each one. I believe that God is everywhere, and that our world is a testament to the spirit of God.

I’d like to finish with a story about a grandmother with the special gift of listening written by Philip Gulley, a Quaker preacher in the USA, in his book called Front Porch tales. He has a special gift, of being able to write skilfully, with humour and love. I couldn’t resist reading this one to you to on Mother’s Day, called My Grandma, the saint.

Let us pray

Dear God,
Thank you for the reminder today to celebrate life.
Life that our Mothers gave us.
Life that is being supported by the mother figures in our lives.
Life that is being supported by your presence in each one of us.
Help us be thankful for the gifts that we have and allow us to use them in the way best we know how
Remind us to be kind to ourselves, and to nurture your spirit that dwells in us
May we appreciate our mothers, grandmothers and all those who have played a nurturing role in our lives, while we in our turn provide the mothering (and fathering) to those who need us.
Amen

Our final song will be number 85, One family. Veronika will play the tune through once before we start singing all four verses.

I’d like to now wish you a lovely Mothering Sunday. During the end music, the children will distribute a gift to help you celebrate Mother’s Day.

Music program

Introductory music

116 – This is the day 3 verses

21 – Thank you for giving me the morning 5 verses

52 – It is a good thing to give thanks 2 times

85 – One family 4 verses

Return to the Top

 

Saal Service in Bentleigh, 24 April 2005

Elder and TSA President, Peter Lange

Musical introduction (piano: Elisabeth Wagner)

Good morning to everyone. I am very glad that I have the opportunity of conducting a Templer Service on this fine and sunny Sunday morning while I am here on visit. I would like to present to you some thoughts on our Templer faith which is, of course, a Christian faith and which is based on Jesus and his teaching.

I want to start with a little story which in its original text is a very profound and wonderfully worded poem written by the German poet Friedrich Rückert. This poem describes a king who treasured a huge number of books in which all the wisdom of the world was collected. But now and then he had to go to other places in his extensive kingdom and settle things there. But he did not want to be left there without his books, so every time he changed his residence he loaded them onto a hundred camels and took them with him.

After several such journeys he realized that his books were a heavy burden for him and his subordinates. He ordered a hundred scholars before him and asked each of them to make an extract from a part of the books. This was done and made travelling easier, for now only one mule was necessary to carry the book extracts.

But the king was not wholly satisfied with this result. Soon he had the scholars again make an extract, an extract of the extracts. And now at last he could carry the wisdom of the world in the form of one single book in his own hands when travelling.

But this was not yet the final stage. He wanted his wisdom still more concentrated and scholars reduced it to a single verse. The king was very glad, for now he could keep this verse constantly in his mind and did not have to carry anything with him.

The author of the poem asks at the end, whether this single verse would really have the desired result for the king. If not, the reason might be that the king had not done the extraction by himself. Everyone of us, he says, for our salvation must make the extracts by ourselves.

Before we go on with our thoughts aroused by this little story, I invite you all to sing with me one of our hymns in the red hymn book, no. 58. It is the German hymn “Lass dir durch keine Lehren”, its author is Erich Bergmann, one of the TGD Elders in the 60s and 70s. I talked about Bergmann’s career and his work in the Templer community recently at the meeting of the Frauenverein in Bentleigh.

There are two verses. Elisabeth will play the tune once before we start singing.

“Lass dir durch keine Lehren aus eines Menschen Mund dein Inneres beschweren, Gott tut sich selber kund”

When, dear friends, the author of this poem thinks that we should, for our sake, make an extract of all the wisdom of the world, he probably thought of what everyone of us needs for his life so that we can be happy and content and be able to bear what is inflicted on us. When we think of our Christian religion: Isn’t it quite a problem that there are so many books written on this faith and faith matters? So many theologians have written thick volumes about the mystery of God, or how our world was created or how it can be explained that this man Jesus of Nazareth has risen from the dead.

I want to ask you: What is really important to be read and to be known? Our hymn has given us a clue to that problem. We do not gain faith and trust in life by looking for theological definitions and confessional systems. It is not a theological system that can free our heart from fear, no, it is rather God’s life-giving spirit which can effect this. And in the words of our little story: our happiness and contentment do not come from accumulating a huge number of books, but are derived from our listening to God’s voice within us and from experiencing the divine force of life in and around us.

When we think of Jesus, he surely never intended to put up a system of religious doctrine. He himself never wrote a single letter. He spoke to people, and in speaking to them they experienced a healing effect. He gave advice and help and very often took a burden off a person. He comforted people when they were in distress. And he taught his disciples how to listen to God’s will. Many gospels, letters and other literature has been written about him, some have succeeded in reaching us two thousand years after his death. They tell us of his life and of his teachings. But how shall we deal with them? The Bible is a very voluminous book. And some passages are rather difficult to understand. Which are the more important, the really essential parts?

In the gospel of St John there is an example how we can make an extract from all the written words when we want to know what matters most in Jesus’ teachings. This gospel has been written relatively late, much later than the other three gospels in the New Testament. This gospel is more an interpretation of what Jesus wanted to achieve rather than a rendering of his actual sayings. But it seems that the author of St John’s gospel had a feeling for that which was the most important in Jesus’ teachings, and he took the liberty of putting it in his own words.

In Chapter 13 (34-35), in the so-called Farewell Discourses, we have the central theme of how we should become a Christian, a follower of Christ. It is the essence of Jesus’ teaching and preaching. I’ll read this short passage: “I give you a new commandment: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you are to love one another. If there is this love among you, then all will know that you are my disciples.”

Doesn’t this short passage represent Christian faith and Christian thinking in a nutshell? Is it equally important to believe in trinity, in the immaculate birth of Jesus, in his ascension and second coming? We Templers think that the essential thing is to orientate ourselves to what Jesus wanted men and women to be, and not to speculate about whether he was man and at the same time God. Jesus for us is convincing because he was a human being and because he had the same needs of life, the same fear of pain and death as we have. He is convincing because of the way he lived and acted.

“I give you a new commandment” – In a sense it was not at all “new”. In the Jewish faith there was, of course, this commandment to love one’s neighbour. But Jesus extended it radically to include not only neighbours, friends and next-of-kin, but also adversaries, opponents, enemies. He exemplified that all other laws and regulations should be executed under the consideration of love. The attitude of love for him was the yardstick by which all other laws and commandments have to be measured for their usefulness.

He certainly did not want to throw old commandments overboard – we know that from his statements in the Sermon on the Mount: “You have learned that our forefathers were told “so and so”, what I tell you is this … -, but he wanted to draw the attention of people to their actual, not only their literal, meaning and implication. Through this the old commandment of loving one’s neighbour got a new emphasis, a new importance for every aspect of life so, I think, it was justified to talk of a “new” commandment.

When I talk about the commandment of love, I remember a vivid story exemplifying what is meant by it: A pious man once came to God and asked: “O Lord, I want to see how heaven and hell look like.” God said: “Yes, you may see it” and he took him to a very big room where people were sitting with very long spoons. In the middle of them, a cooking pot filled with a delicious dish was boiling. They helped themselves from the dish with their spoons. But these people looked very thin, pale and miserable. No wonder: Their spoons were all too long, they couldn’t put them in their mouths. They couldn’t enjoy their delicious food.

The visitor asked: “What funny room is this?” And the answer was: “It is the hell.”

They enter another room. It looks exactly like the first one. Again there are people sitting around and in the middle of them a cooking pot is steaming with delicious food. But – there is a difference to the first room: These people here look very healthy, well-nourished and happy.

“Why is that?” he wants to know. He looks again and again, and now he discovers what makes the difference: These people put their spoons into the mouths of their neighbours. One gives the other the necessary food.

And now the visitor knows where he is.

The term which I associate with this story is that of “serving”. One person served the other one. It is a metaphor for how human society is functioning. Think of the many services everyone of us is getting from other people! And think of how happy we are when we can make use of a service that others are giving us! Everyone is gifted with talents - of which sometimes we don’t even know - and it is the advantage of an association of people that each one of them differs from the other and that each one of them can, within his talents, be of service to others.

The gospel describes – again it is St John’s gospel – how Jesus before Passover washed the feet of his disciples and how he said: “I, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another’s feet. I have set an example: you are to do as I have done for you.” It is this a very profound Biblical scene, telling us that we must serve one another, not according to rank and standing, but out of a loving attitude. When we realize how largely we depend on the services that others are giving us, then we must willingly do the same in return.

Another motivating force that can make us willing and ready to be of service to others is gratitude, gratitude for all the unearned gifts of life which we have received. And there are so many of them! We should become more aware of them! In religious language we call this “undeserved grace”. Having enough to eat, living in peace, having medical aid when being sick, having access to education and culture, having means of transportation – to mention only a few examples.

The gifts we possess personally - our skills and talents, our abilities and capabilities - should always motivate us to make use of them for the sake of others, too. This is also meant by “loving our neighbour”. In the parable of the entrusted pounds we can read that we should not bury our pounds, not leave idle and unused what we have received from nature as gifts. When serving others is done in an attitude of love and attention, our reward will be a new joy of life and unexpected happiness. What we do to others will radiate back to us. Our life will be enriched and gain a new quality. Who would not want that to become reality!

Some might object that it is not always possible to love one’s neighbour. We might not like the way he (or she) looks, the way he speaks, the way he acts. But loving one’s neighbour doesn’t mean that we should like him (or her). It is not meant that we embrace the whole world. Our loving attitude consists in that we just do nothing that would reduce the others’ quality of life. It consists in that we exercise responsibility in all our actions: in what we do, in what we say, in what we think. How often does it occur that people are offended by remarks made by others in an irresponsible way. How much quarreling is started by thinking bad of others.

We really have so many chances to avoid misunderstanding, anger and hatred, so many chances to promote peace.

I am strongly convinced that a society united by mutual love, understanding and fellowship will have a future. The bonds between the individuals in it will help to overcome disturbances and crises. They will bring about new strength and new impetus, which will be more than just an addition of the strength and impetus of the individual members.  Our world, which is increasingly becoming a world of individualists, is in desperate need of the positive effect of communities whose members are linked with each other in a loving and understanding attitude.

This, dear friends, is the great task that all Christian communities are facing. And it is the task the first Templers have chosen when they decided to go their own way and establish a new community of like-minded men and women. This is still the task of Templer communities in Germany and in Australia. This aim shall be the fundamental bonding force that keeps us united. I am sure that everyone of us is aware of that.

“A new commandment is given to us that we love one another”. It is this single phrase that will carry us through a life of richness and fulfilment. We do not need a hundred camels to understand and learn how God wants the world to be. We can easily keep that single phrase in mind and remember it. No high education and scholarship is needed to understand it. We will cherish our master and teacher Jesus of Nazareth. May we remain his followers!

Let us finally sing a second hymn in our hymnbook, no. 41. We’ll try to sing this relatively new hymn which is frequently sung by the Templers in Stuttgart at their Saal Services. “Herr, deine Liebe ist wie Gras und Ufer, wie Wind und Weite und wie ein Zuhaus“. Elisabeth will again play the tune before we start singing. And then 4 verses.

“Herr, deine Liebe ist wie Gras und Ufer, wie Wind und Weite und wie ein Zuhaus.”

Let us now pray to God that we do not lose the aim of our life out of sight. I kindly ask you to stand up.
Eternal, ever-present God,
You have given us our lives. You know what needs we have. Let us not be anxious about tomorrow, but let us have faith in today.
You have given us the task of meeting our fellow human beings in a loving and understanding attitude. Many in the generations gone by have demonstrated through their lives how this task is put into daily practice.
Give us the insight that by having mutual bonds of love and friendship we can contribute to a better world and to overcome resentment, malice and hatred.
We are small in numbers. Give us the strength not to despair, and not to fail and weaken in our efforts towards a world that is worth to be lived in.
Let us now pray together the words that Jesus told his followers to pray:

Our Father in heaven,
Hallowed be Your name,
Your Kingdom come,
Your will be done on earth as in heaven.
Give us today our daily bread.
Forgive us our sins,
As we forgive those who sin against us.
Lead us when in temptation and deliver us from evil.
For the Kingdom, the power and the glory are Yours forever.
 
May the Lord bless us and keep us,
May the Lord make his face shine upon us and be gracious unto us,
May the Lord lift up his countenance upon us and give us peace.

Amen.

Return to the Top 

 

MORGENANDACHT im Alten- und Pflegeheim TTHA Bayswater
am 17. April 2005

Elder and TSA President, Peter Lange

Eingangsmusik (am Klavier: Irene Blaich)

Grußworte

Ich möchte euch zu Beginn ein kleines Gedicht lesen. Es ist ein Morgengebet und beschreibt die Gedanken, die wir am Anfang eines Tages haben können. Ist nicht die Morgenstunde immer wieder etwas ganz Besonderes? Fühlen wir da nicht, wie uns neue Gedanken und neue Kraft gegeben werden, auch wenn wir am Abend davor mit Sorgen und Beschwernissen zu Bett gegangen sind? Das wollen auch die folgenden Dichterworte zum Ausdruck bringen:

„Mein Gott, ich danke dir, bist nicht von mir gewichen;
du warest über mir, da mich die Nacht beschlichen.
Noch hat an mir verlorn die Nacht mit ihren Sorgen;
Ich trat in deinen Morgen, als wär ich neu geborn.

All was ich mag und kann, dankt dir für deine Güte.
Nimm heut dich meiner an, bewahre mein Gemüte
Vor dem, der jeder Zeit mich sucht mit seinen Ränken;
Lehr mich das Rechte denken und halt das Unrecht weit.

Ein Tag hat seine Pflicht auch in dem kleinsten Leben;
hilf, so versäum ich nicht, was du mir aufgegeben.
Bleib bei mir diesen Tag, dass ich an seinem Ende
Mein Herz und meine Hände dir fröhlich zeigen mag.“

In diesem Gedicht ist von Gottes großer Güte die Rede. Sie wollen wir loben und preisen, wenn wir jetzt unser Eingangslied anstimmen: „Wie groß ist des Allmächtgen Güte“. Wir finden das Lied im schwarzen Gesangbuch. Wir singen davon den 1., 2. und 4. Vers.

Gemeinsames Lied

Für den heutigen Sonntag ist der folgende Abschnitt aus dem Lukasevangelium vorgesehen, es ist die Geschichte vom Zolleinnehmer Zachäus. Ich lese sie in der Bibelübersetzung von Martin Luther:
„Und Jesus ging nach Jericho hinein und zog hindurch. Und siehe, da war ein Mann mit Namen Zachäus, der war ein Oberer der Zöllner und war reich. Und er begehrte, Jesus zu sehen, wer er wäre, und konnte es nicht wegen der Menge; denn er war klein von Gestalt. Und er lief voraus und stieg auf einen Maulbeerbaum, um ihn zu sehen; denn dort sollte er durchkommen.
Und als Jesus an die Stelle kam, sah er auf und sprach zu ihm: Zachäus, steig eilends herunter, denn ich muss heute in deinem Haus einkehren. Und er stieg eilends herunter und nahm ihn auf mit Freuden. Als sie das sahen, murrten sie alle und sprachen: Bei einem Sünder ist er eingekehrt.
Zachäus aber trat vor den Herrn und sprach: Siehe, Herr, die Hälfte von meinem Besitz gebe ich den Armen, und wenn ich jemanden betrogen habe, so gebe ich es vierfach zurück. Jesus aber sprach zu ihm: Heute ist diesem Hause Heil widerfahren, denn auch er ist Abrahams Sohn. Denn der Menschensohn ist gekommen, zu sehen und selig zu machen, was verloren ist. (Lukas 19,1-10)

Das ist eine sehr anschauliche Geschichte, liebe Zuhörer, meint ihr nicht auch? Wir können die Szene so richtig bildhaft vor unserem geistigen Auge ablaufen sehen: wie der Wanderprediger und Lehrer Jesus von Nazareth mit seinen Jüngern in Palästina von Ort zu Ort zieht und unter anderem auch durch die alte Stadt Jericho kommt. Die Kunde von seinem Kommen ist ihm schon voraus geeilt, und so stehen die Menschen an der Straße und wollen ihn begrüßen und mit ihm sprechen. Er gilt ja als einer, der den Menschen Heilung und Hoffnung vermittelt.

In der Geschichte ist nun die Rede von Zachäus, einem Zolleinnehmer, der Jesus auch sehen wollte, da er aber klein von Gestalt war, musste er dazu auf einen Baum steigen. Warum wird dieser Zachäus in der Geschichte wohl so hervorgehoben? Wir müssen wissen, dass die Römer damals eine harte Herrschaft über Palästina und die Juden ausübten, was sie bei diesen sehr verhasst machte, und dass sie Steuern von den Bauern eintrieben. Diese Steuern (oder diesen Zoll, wie man damals sagte) haben sie aber nicht selbst eingetrieben, dazu stellten sie jüdische Landesbewohner an, sogenannte Zolleinnehmer, die dann einen Teil der Einnahmen für sich behalten durften. Meistens verlangten die Zolleinnehmer von den Leuten dann noch ein bisschen mehr, als mit den römischen Behörden ausgemacht war und hatten dadurch noch einen Extragewinn. In unserer Geschichte heißt es ja, dass dieser Zachäus sehr reich war.

Es ist verständlich, dass die jüdischen Landesbewohner Anstoß daran nahmen, dass ihre eigenen Landsleute, die Zolleinnehmer, mit den römischen Behörden zusammenarbeiteten und durch ihre Steuerforderungen die Bauern bis aufs Letzte ausquetschten. Man nannte sie Verräter, Kollaborateure, Sünder – mit ihnen wollte man nichts zu tun haben.

Was ist nun mit diesem Zachäus los? Warum geht er wohl auf die Straße, um diesen Jesus mit seinen Begleitern zu sehen? Er war doch ein Mensch, der sich wenig um Religion und um religiöse Gebote scherte. Vielleicht war ihm plötzlich bewusst geworden, dass es zwar schön und angenehm war, dass er ein gutes Einkommen hatte und ein Vermögen ansammeln konnte, dass es aber alles andere als schön war, dass die Leute mit dem Finger auf ihn zeigten und nichts mit ihm zu tun haben wollten. Er war ein Geächteter, ein Ausgestoßener aus der menschlichen Gesellschaft, und alle mieden ihn. Ich kann mir schon vorstellen, dass sich dieser Mann äußerst unwohl gefühlt haben muss in seiner Haut.

Und nun kommt dieser Jesus an seinem Haus vorbei, sieht ihn auf dem Baum und lädt sich selbst zur Rast in seinem Haus ein. Was muss wohl in diesem Moment im Innern des Zachäus vorgegangen sein? Welche Gedanken sind ihm da wohl durch den Kopf geschossen? Da kümmert sich dieser Wanderprediger Jesus kein bisschen um seinen schlechten Ruf, sondern er kommt sogar zum Essen in sein Haus. Ein Anderer hätte dieses Haus auf keinen Fall betreten und noch weniger Anstalten gemacht, mit dem Zolleinnehmer an demselben Tisch zu sitzen. So etwas wäre für einen frommen und auf Reinheit bedachten Juden undenkbar gewesen. Aber Jesus war doch ein Jude!

Es wird in der Geschichte nichts darüber ausgesagt, was Jesus mit Zachäus in dessen Haus geredet hat. Ich denke, dass es den Evangelisten, der das berichtet, eigentlich nicht interessierte. Vielleicht ist es auch nicht wesentlich, was geredet wurde, sonst wäre es in der Geschichte doch erwähnt worden. Vielleicht haben sie gar nicht so viel miteinander geredet. Trotzdem geschieht Unglaubliches: Als Jesus wieder gehen will, sagt Zachäus beim Abschied zu ihm, er wolle einen Teil seines Vermögens an Bedürftige geben und außerdem diejenigen, denen er zuviel abverlangt habe, nachträglich für seine schäbige Handlungsweise entschädigen. Er sagt nicht nur, dass er die zu Unrecht erhobenen Steuern zurückzahlen wolle, nein, er will den Geschädigten sogar das Vierfache des zuviel Erhobenen erstatten. ---Offensichtlich hat allein das Hereinkommen des Jesus in sein Haus diese Wende bewirkt.

Ist das nicht überaus überraschend und erstaunlich? Wer hätte eine solche Zusicherung von einem dieser verachteten Zolleinnehmer erwartet, die nur auf ihren eigenen Vorteil bedacht waren? Wer von unseren Zeitgenossen würde denn heutzutage freiwillig Geld oder Vermögen zurückgeben, wenn es mit unlauteren Mitteln erworben worden wäre? Ich kenne kein Beispiel dafür. Mit dem Unrechtbewusstsein ist es unter den Menschen heutzutage leider sehr schlecht bestellt. In Deutschland hat es zum Beispiel viele, viele Jahre gedauert, bis die Industrieunternehmen, die im Dritten Reich von der Arbeit der Zwangsarbeiter profitiert hatten, in den letzten Jahren den Familien der Zwangsarbeiter eine Entschädigung für diese Zwangsarbeit zahlten. Und das nur auf Druck aus der Öffentlichkeit. Und eine ganze Anzahl dieser Firmen zahlte gar nichts. Ich denke, dass die Geschichte mit Zachäus es herausfordert, dass wir uns Gedanken darüber machen.

Der Schlüssel zum Verständnis der Geschichte ist eindeutig Jesus, der Mann, der in Anderen ein Umdenken bewirkt, der Mann, der die Mauern und Gräben, die zwischen den Menschen errichtet und gezogen werden, überwindet, der Mann, der sich auch mit den Asozialen, den Ausgestoßenen und Ausgegrenzten an einen Tisch setzt, um damit zu demonstrieren, dass Gott, unser Vater im Himmel, seine Liebe und Gnade allen seinen Kindern gleichermaßen zukommen lässt. Die Menschen verdanken sich alle Gottes schöpferischer Kraft, warum sollte er denn einen Teil von ihnen verachten und verstoßen? Sie mögen seine Gebote zwar oft missachten, doch eine Rückkehr zu ihm und zu seiner Geborgenheit ist jederzeit möglich, wenn man sein Tun bereut. Das zeigt die Geschichte mit Zachäus.

Denn Zachäus hat offensichtlich bereut, was er seinen Mitmenschen an Unrecht zugefügt hat, so wie auch der verlorene Sohn in dem bekannten Gleichnis, der auf die schiefe Bahn geraten ist, Reue empfindet und sich auf den Weg zurück zu seinem Vater macht, wo ihm dieser mit ausgebreiteten Armen entgegen kommt. Braucht es bei solchen Bildern noch einer besonderen Erklärung?!

Damit, dass Jesus spontan in das Haus des Zachäus ging – er konnte ja vorher nicht wissen, dass dieser Mann Probleme mit seinem Leben hatte und deshalb auf die Straße gegangen war, vielleicht in der Hoffnung, dass ihm eine Lösung seiner Probleme aufgetan würde – damit hat Jesus ein Zeichen gesetzt, dass jeder Mensch die Mauern zwischen sich und anderen übersteigen oder Gräben überspringen kann. Es gibt so vieles, was immer wieder zwischen Menschen steht und was ihr Verhältnis zueinander trübt. Er hat ein Beispiel dafür gegeben, dass ein solches getrübtes Verhältnis auch wieder ins Reine gebracht werden kann. Er hat es vermutlich gespürt, dass diesen Zachäus irgendetwas im Innern gedrückt hat und dass er damit nicht fertig wurde, und er erkannte, dass er etwas tun müsse, damit dieser Mensch seines Lebens wieder glücklich werden konnte. Dieser Jesus aus Nazareth konnte den Menschen in ihr Innerstes, in ihr Herz sehen. ---

Diese Geschichte ist im Grunde eine Zusammenfassung des ganzen Evangeliums. Wenn man wissen will, wofür dieser Jesus in all seiner kurzen öffentlichen Wirksamkeit eingetreten ist, dann ist das – wie in einer Nussschale – in der Begegnung zwischen Jesus und Zachäus enthalten.

Dieser Jesus hat seinen Mitmenschen – und damit auch uns - einen Spiegel vorgehalten. So oft treffen wir ein Urteil über andere, verurteilen sie womöglich, und merken nicht, dass die Anderen dasselbe mit uns machen. Wenn uns selbst daran gelegen ist, dass wir glücklich und zufrieden leben, müssen wir dasselbe doch auch bei den Anderen voraussetzen und unsererseits dazu beitragen, soweit es uns möglich ist, dass sie glücklich und zufrieden leben können.

Peter Uhlherr hat beim Saal vor einer Woche drüben in der Chapel von den „Kindern Gottes“ gesprochen. Wenn uns bewusst wird, dass jeder Mensch ein Kind Gottes ist, also vom Schöpfer gewollt und von ihm angenommen, dann haben wir den ersten Schritt dazu getan, dass Gottes Reich Wirklichkeit wird. Eine Gemeinde wie die unsere, die das Trachten nach dem Gottesreich zu ihrem Leitmotiv gewählt hat, ist ganz besonders gefordert, Mauern zwischen Menschen abzubrechen. Jesus, unser Lehrer, hat uns den Weg dazu gewiesen. Als Christen haben wir uns dazu bekannt, ihm zu folgen. Gott gebe uns die Kraft und die Einsicht dazu.

Wir wollen von dem angefangenen Lied noch die Verse 5 und 6 singen.

Ich möchte zum Schluss ein Gebet in Gedichtform sprechen, in dem alles zusammengefasst ist, um was wir bitten wollen, wenn uns Kummer und Mutlosigkeit überkommt. Es stammt von dem Stuttgarter Pfarrer Rudolf Daur:

„Herr, wenn wir im Dunkel tasten, seufzen unter unsren Lasten,
sei du selbst uns Licht und Kraft. Treibt das wirre Weltgedränge
uns in ausweglose Enge, so erlös uns aus der Haft.
Wenn wir müde werden wollen, nimmer wissen, was wir sollen,
nicht erkennen, was uns gut, o dann tritt hervor in Klarheit,
rüst uns aus mit Geist und Wahrheit und erneure unsren Mut.
Fülle unsre leeren Hände, unsern Sinn zur Liebe wende,
dran der Nächste habe teil. Lass uns auch in dieser Stunde
preisen dich mit Herz und Munde. Herr, wir warten auf dein Heil.“

Ich lade alle ein, mit mir noch das Vaterunser zu sprechen:

Vater unser im Himmel,
geheiligt werde dein Name.
Dein Reich komme.
Dein Wille geschehe
wie im Himmel so auf Erden.
Unser tägliches Brot gib uns heute
und vergib uns unsere Schuld,
wie auch wir vergeben unseren Schuldigern.
Führe uns, wenn wir in Versuchung sind,
und erlöse uns von dem Bösen.
Denn dein ist das Reich und die Kraft und die Herrlichkeit in Ewigkeit.
Amen.

Ausgangsmusik

Return to the Top

 


SUNDAY SERVICE – BAYSWATER
10th April 2005

Elder: Peter Uhlherr

Music: Krista Imberger

Hymn: No. 56 v. 1,2,3 - 4,5
(Komm o komm du Geist des Lebens)

Text: Paul – Romans 8:12-16
(“Living as God’s children”)

Our table of lessons for today lists the theme of our text as “Living as children of God”; the text itself is taken from the letter of Paul to the Romans; I am going to read a few extra verses from the letter in order to give some background for the text.

[First read 8: 5-9; then the text 8:12-16.]

The Gospel according to Paul ROMANS 8
Those who live on the level of our lower nature have their outlook formed by it, and that spells death; but those who live on the level of the spirit have the spiritual outlook, and that is life and peace. For the outlook of the lower nature does not subject itself to the law of God: those who live on such a level cannot possibly please God.
But that is not how you live. You are on the spiritual level, if only God’s Spirit dwells within you; and if a man does not possess the Spirit of Christ, he is no Christian.
It follows that our lower nature has no claim upon us; we are not obliged to live on that level. If you do so, you must die. But if by the Spirit you put to death all the base pursuits of the body, then you will live.
For all who are moved by the Spirit of God are sons of God. The Spirit you have received is not a spirit of slavery leading you back into a life of fear, but a Spirit that makes us sons, enabling us to cry ‘Abba! Father!’ In that cry the Spirit of God joins with our spirit in testifying that we are God’s children; and if children, then heirs.

The letter of Paul to the Romans is in three sections, each subtitled: – first, “the gospel according to Paul”; second, “the purpose of God in history”; third, “Christian behaviour”. This is clearly a document of profound importance to the church. In it, Paul tries to put the fledgling religion of Christianity on a logical and sound theological footing. In it we also recognise many of the concepts, much of the dogma, and the jargon adopted by the orthodox churches. The words of Paul were intended to illustrate his theology, his arguments; and before using those words for our arguments, we should at least check that, in so doing, we don’t destroy their original meaning and intent.
With this in mind, I want to summarise Paul’s gospel, using more extracts from his letter to the Romans: –

Chapter 3
Jews and Greeks alike are all under the power of sin. For ‘no human being can be justified in the sight of God’ for having kept the law: law brings only the consciousness of sin.
but now, quite independently of law, God’s justice has been brought to light: it is God’s way of righting wrong, effective through faith in Christ for all who have such faith – all, without distinction. For all alike have sinned, and are deprived of the divine splendour, and all are justified by God’s free grace alone, through his act of liberation in the person of Christ Jesus. For God designed him to be the means of expiating sin by his sacrificial death, effective through faith. God meant by this to demonstrate his justice.

Chapter 5
Therefore, now that we have been justified through faith, let us continue at peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have been allowed to enter the sphere of God’s grace, where we now stand. This is the ground of hope because God’s love has flooded our inmost heart through the Holy Spirit he has given us.
It was through one man that sin entered the world, and through sin death, and thus death pervaded the whole human race, inasmuch as all men have sinned. God’s act of grace is the gift that came to so many by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ. The result of one misdeed was condemnation for all men, so the result of one just act is acquittal and life for all men. Through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous. As sin established its reign by way of death, so God’s grace might establish its reign in righteousness, and result in eternal life through Jesus Christ.

Chapter 6
When we were baptised into union with Christ Jesus, we were baptised into his death. By baptism we were buried with him, in order that, as Christ was raised from the dead, so also we might set our feet upon the new path of life.
If we have become incorporate with him in a death like his, we shall also be one with him in a resurrection like his. We know that Christ, once raised from the dead, is no longer under the dominion of death. For in dying as he died, he died to sin, once for all, and in living as he lives, he lives to God. In the same way you must regard yourselves as dead to sin and alive to God. So sin must no longer reign in your mortal body. You must no longer use its several parts as implements for doing wrong. No: yield your bodies to God as implements for doing right; for sin shall no longer be your master, because you are no longer under law, but under the grace of God.

Chapter 8
There is no condemnation for those who are united with Christ Jesus, because in Christ Jesus the life-giving law of the Spirit has set you free from the law of sin and death. What the law alone could never do, because our lower nature robbed it of all potency, God has done: by sending his own Son in a form like that of our own sinful nature, and as a sacrifice for sin, he has passed judgement against sin within that very nature, so that the commandment of the law may find fulfilment in us, whose conduct, no longer under the control of our lower nature, is directed by the Spirit.

Paul’s theology, though very logical, probably does not appeal to many of us here today. However, in his day, it must have been quite acceptable, because the Christian communities he helped to establish grew very quickly. The purpose of his theology was to make the message of Jesus believable and to give it authority; that is, to give the community an incentive to live by the teaching of Jesus. Our text for today entirely supports Paul’s theology and relies greatly on the concept of spirit, the spirit of God being active within individuals, thereby creating “children of God”.

The term spirit occurs seven times in the nine lines of our text. It is clearly a concept central to today’s subject. Even though Paul was by birth and education a Pharisaic Jew, the environment in which he grew up was Greek, and that is probably where his notion of spirit originated. Spirit was not an important concept in Judaism. That may also explain why Christianity took root so effectively in Greek communities, whereas it experienced opposition among Jews.

The ancient Greek model of the human individual envisages a three-fold body. First the physical body – material and perishable; it returns to the material of the earth and becomes indistinguishable from it. Second, the soul, which inhabits the material body and animates it, energises it; it gives the physical body life, vitality; the soul is also perishable and returns to the earth – to the earth’s energy store, and becomes indistinguishable from it. Third, the spirit, which guides and controls the body by directing the vital body functions of the soul; the spirit is the spark of life, the ego, the intellect. Whether or not the spirit is perishable or persists after death is a contentious issue, as indeed, its very existence is to many. The concept of spirit begs the questions, where does it come from, where does it go and why does it need a physical body to inhabit? I am obviously not going to answer any of these questions. Nevertheless, I suspect that the concept of spirit (undefined in detail) has long been and still is of benefit to many people in rationalising the human condition, creation, death, the purpose of life…

I personally find the concept useful and even comforting from time to time. For example, it is quite useful in rationalising the story of Adam, as depicting man’s growth. At some point in the distant past, the spark of sentience entered man’s being – we can visualise it as a fragment of the creator’s power; the spirit of God. And this made man himself creative and inquisitive – he discovered the world around him and himself in it – man had found self-awareness. The creative spark had become an ego. As such it was no longer an indistinguishable part of the creative spirit, but a clearly differentiated individual. That point of evolution represents the fall from grace – man’s (Adam’s) discovery of knowledge and self. Why call it a fall? Because evil is an integral part of knowledge and it is inseparable from it; it necessarily tainted man’s ego. Rather than God evicting man from his sphere as punishment for discovering himself as an individual, I much prefer the notion that man chose the path of discovery and growth, conscious for the first time of the overwhelming attractions of the creation. Along this path man inevitably encountered evil – hate, power, revenge – and sampled it in his quest for knowledge. But when you consider a path that weaves through creation and encompasses more and more knowledge, assimilating creation along the way, such a path can lead nowhere else but back to the creator. And there, in that simple-minded bible story, you have a description of man’s destiny: –

The fall, or separation from grace, which is the establishment of the ego; and the ego’s subsequent search to regain grace, by assimilating the creation and recombining with the creator. Man has been wandering, or stumbling, along his path of discovery, learning and experience – the path of evolution if you prefer – for millennia. At regular intervals prophets and teachers arise, who have a deeper insight than others of their time. They repeatedly warn against the temptations of evil, the pitfalls along man’s path; or more usually they draw attention to the many errors man has already committed and therefore they call for change or reform. We consider Jesus to be the greatest of these teachers; he formulated very concise instructions for negotiating the path to knowledge; for negotiating life as a spiritual journey that leads back to the creator and his grace.

Paul portrays Jesus Christ as God’s answer to the problem of Adam. And in a sense that is what I have said also. The age of Adam discovered self-awareness and knowledge, and with it evil; Jesus Christ has given us a commandment to overcome evil in our lives. The only difference is that I don’t include any sacrificial element.

Now I want to relate the view of life as a spiritual journey back to the writing of Paul. In the section of his letter subtitled “the purpose of God in history”, Paul argues logically as ever, and convincingly that, although the Mosaic law was given to the Jews, its condensation by Jesus into the single law of love and compassion has extended the accessibility of this new law to non-Jews. Indeed, the view of God himself is altered – from a God of the Jews to a God of all nations.

Paul summarises (2:11) “God has no favourites; “(1:16-17)” the gospel is the saving power of God for everyone who has faith – the Jew first but the Greek also”… and most importantly, Paul makes the following pivotal observation about the nature of this new law – the teaching of Jesus: –

(Romans 2:13-15) It is not by hearing the law, but by doing it, that men will be justified before God. When Gentiles who do not possess the law carry out its precepts by the light of nature, then, although they have no law, they are their own law, for they display the effect of the law inscribed on their hearts. Their conscience is called as witness, and their own thoughts argue the case on either side, against them or even for them.

This statement has quite extraordinary implications. A person who does not know the law, but lives by the same precepts of generosity, love and compassion by the light of nature – i.e. by his own conviction, inherent humanity and moral strength – such a person will be justified before God; i.e. qualifies as a “child of God”!
That opens the door to anyone, atheist, or any other non-Christian to be regarded as a “child of God” in the sense of one obeying God’s will. This gives rise to the paradoxical notion that an atheist who denies the very existence of a God may nevertheless be unknowingly a truer “child of God” in our terminology than a nominal Christian, who has received the law but, through lack of faith in it, through lack of conviction, does not live by it. All people are potentially children of God: – Christians who believe in the law and therefore obey it; non-Christians who do not even know the law but inherently live by very similar precepts through their inner convictions – “by the light of nature”. Paul equates the effectiveness of inner conviction with that of faith in the law.

If we envisage life as a journey of learning, of spiritual growth, then our success can be gauged by how close we come to being children of God.
“It is not by hearing the law, but by doing it, that men will be justified before God,” as Paul says.
This last statement also has quite far-reaching implications. If we have heard the law, we have heard about the spirit of God which inhabits the individual. Simply knowing about spirit, studying spirit, even practising “spiritual” exercises – asceticism, self-deprivation, chant, meditation – these things by themselves – on their own – do not constitute spiritual growth. No amount of knowledge about spirit, no amount of debate about love can produce as much personal growth as one single act of compassion! Furthermore, because to be “children of God” we have to act on the law and not just know it, it is not possible to do this in isolation.

Spiritual growth is not possible by withdrawing into a cloistered environment of solitude; and in solitude contemplating the law, a devotion to and love of God in solitude is not effective until another human being is touched by it. Only when our actions can be felt, can they bear fruit and lead to growth. After all, the new law is a code of behaviour towards our neighbour – the presence of a neighbour is a prerequisite! Without a neighbour, there is no law!

Now we can look at what Paul says about Christian behaviour – doing the law, and living as “children of God”. After his very abstract theological exposition of Christian faith, Paul’s final instruction in living as “children of God”, in whom God’s spirit dwells, turns out to be quite prosaic. Paul writes as follows: –

Chapter 12
Do not be conceited or think too highly of yourself; but think your way to a sober estimate based on the measure of faith that God has dealt to each of you. For just as in a single human body there are many limbs and organs, all with different functions, so all of us form one body, serving individually as limbs and organs to one another in that community.
The gifts we possess differ as they are allotted to us by God’s grace and must be exercised accordingly; the gift of administration, in administration. A teacher should employ his gift in teaching. (If you are a leader, exert yourself to lead); If you give to charity, give with all your heart; if you are helping others in distress, do it cheerfully.

Contribute to the needs of God’s people, and practise hospitality. With the joyful be joyful, and mourn with the mourners. Care as much about each other as about yourselves.
Call down blessings on your persecutors. Never pay back evil for evil. If possible, so far as it lies with you, live at peace with all men.

He who loves his neighbour has satisfied every claim of the law. For the commandments, ‘Thou shalt not commit adultery, thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not covet’, and any other commandment there may be, are all summed up in the one rule, ‘Love your neighbour as yourself.’ Love cannot wrong a neighbour; therefore the whole law is summed up in love.

Because Christian communities had both Jewish and Greek mixed backgrounds, there must have been frequent friction concerning dietary rituals, the observances of holy days.

Chapter 14
IF A MAN IS WEAK in his faith you must accept him without attempting to settle doubtful points. One man will have faith enough to eat all kinds of food, while a weaker man eats only vegetables. The man who eats must not hold in contempt the man who does not, and he who does not eat must not pass judgement on the one who does; for God has accepted both.
Again, this man regards one day more highly than another, while that man regards all days alike. On such a point everyone should have reached conviction in his own mind. He who respects the one day has the Lord in mind in doing so, and he who eats meat has the Lord in mind when he eats, since he gives thanks to God; and he who abstains has the Lord in mind no less, since he too gives thanks to God.

Happy is the man who can make his decision with a clear conscience! But a man who has doubts is guilty if he eats, because his action does not arise from his conviction, and anything which does not arise from conviction is sin.

Let us therefore cease judging one another, but rather make this simple judgement: that no obstacle or stumbling-block be placed in a brother’s way.

From the success of Paul’s missionary journeys, his theology must have given his listeners something to cling to, something to believe in, an incentive to accept and live by the teaching of Jesus. In more recent times, Paul’s theology seems to have become more of a stumbling block for some people, rather than an incentive. Christoph Hoffmann is our most immediate example. The Age carried a letter to the editor a few weeks ago (The Age, 26/03/05) ”…Jesus is not tortured and killed for the sins of the world, like the Jewish ritual scapegoat…, but rather, he is a good man, in whom was uniquely exemplified the love and compassion of God, and who was put to death by a political system challenged by those attributes”.

As I compare Paul’s theology on the one hand, and his model of Christian behaviour on the other, I can only see one essential connection between the two – that is the teaching of love and compassion emanated from Jesus. The theology of death, resurrection, everlasting life, only serves as an incentive to believe in the teaching’s effectiveness through its authority. It is a prop, a crutch. As the human spirit develops and grows, it should need progressively fewer props. Theology should be continually updated, to keep it in tune with prevailing views of God and spirit. Otherwise it will lose its effectiveness as an incentive and will become a stumbling block. And I believe that ultimately, perhaps in the distant future, mankind’s collective journey towards spiritual perfection will be complete when every individual lives spontaneously, “by the light of nature” in accord with the universal law of mutual tolerance, love and compassion, having done away entirely with the incentive, the prop, of theology. I would like to leave you with an image of our mutual interdependence during our spiritual journey, as expressed by Khalil Gibran in the “The Prophet”: –
“Like a procession you walk together towards your god-self; you are the way and the wayfarers. And when one of you falls down, he falls for those behind him, a caution against the stumbling stone. BUT, he also falls for those ahead of him, who, although they are faster and surer of foot, did not remove the stumbling stone.”

Lord’s Prayer


Return to the Top

 

Easter Service in Bentleigh

Elder  Alfred Klink

Hymns: Easter hymn No 88, "Ostern verkündet die Hoffnung..." all three verses
Hymn N0 75 "Nun danked alle Gott..." all three verses

Music: Monika Strasser

Prelude

Text: Mat 28:1-8 The experience of the empty tomb

Today is Easter. An eventful week in the Christian calendar lies behind us; from Palm Sunday, when Jesus entered Jerusalem in triumph, to the Abendmahl on Maundy-Thursday and to his death and burial on Karfreitag. Easter is one of the oldest Christian festivals. Historic records show that it was commemorated in Rom as early as 115 AD. With the resurrection celebration starts a 50 day Easter period to Pentecost, which includes Himmelfahrt, Ascension, 40 days from now. Our text for today comes from Matthew 28, the last chapter of the Matthew Gospel, verses 1 to 8, where the two Marys visit Jesus’ grave on Sunday morning and find the tomb empty. – –

The natural reaction of anyone to such news today would be to assume that the body had been removed, stolen, hidden, taken somewhere else. I suppose it was no different then. The gospel writer tells of the security measures put in place to prevent just such an action, and then, after the fact, describes the bribing of the guards to make them say that the body had in effect been stolen. They were trying to forestall the rumour that Jesus had risen from the dead as he had hinted he would. To us Templers the fact whether Jesus rose from the dead or not is an insignificant embellishment of his mission. An issue which does not detract one iota from the significance of the message Jesus taught during his life-time. We can recognise the significance and the value for society of the (at the time) revolutionary statements made by the man concerning love, trust and forgiveness. In fact, seen, as made by a mortal man, albeit an exceptionally gifted man, the statements become so much more relevant to us than if they had been made by an omniscient deity. The same applies, of course, also to his sufferings.

For us Templers the sermon on the mount as reported in Matthew 5, 6 &7 is Jesus’ legacy to us, not the numerous wonders attributed to him by the Gospel writers and the Church. Turning water into wine, calming the stormy sea or walking on water, curing the lame, the blind and the obsessed we see as symbolic representations of mental attitudes to a specific problem at the time. But to the Church they mean everything. Their whole philosophy, their doctrine itself is built on a belief in the resurrection, on the supernatural, all conquering powers of the son of God, sent by God to save mankind. According to some church authorities Templers cannot even call themselves Christians because we do not insist on this indispensable divine requisite for membership. So, deprived of its ecclesiastic image, its messianic overtones and stripped of its artificial religious message what does the Easter period still hold for us? What is left of the magic of Easter other than chocolate eggs and an extra long-long weekend of fun in the sun? Does the story of the empty tomb still offer scope for reflection? Yes, yes and yes! It contains deep insight into human nature and encourages us to philosophise on our understanding of life.

Let us now sing the Easter Hymn number 88, all three verses

I was born in the northern hemisphere of the Earth, where Easter falls into the beginning of the year, in Spring. There, Easter symbolises the resourcefulness of Nature. The fest is a celebration of the arrival of Spring, when the days grow longer, the sunshine warmer and the Earth dresses itself up in a patchwork of green and gold. Easter there symbolises the awakening out of the depth of a winter of despair, when everything looked dead and lost and life’s conflicts did not make sense anymore, when all efforts seemed futile, when struggle against the harsh, frozen wasteland was in vain. Suddenly, literally overnight, there awakens a new spirit, Spring has come, and hidden within this great recovery of nature there is a realisation of a parallel to the indomitable spirit in mankind, rising to the occasion. Each Spring is a vision greater and more beautiful than before and opens more of the future for us with meaningful challenges. It is as though the depth of despair is after all not a bottomless pit but a stepping stone, yes, a mountain top from where, after the fog of despair has lifted, you can see further than before, look beyond the immediate problems confronting you and step over or around what seemed insurmountable only days before. You realise that the valley of the shadows, the evil and despair, the hopelessness are not in nature but within your mind alone. All you have to do is lift up your eyes from your inward sorrows and your self-pity, your despair and your anxiety, and the walls of depression will disappear. A new day is dawning, a new Spring has come and with it a new burst of energy. As you embrace it your mind will take a quantum leap forward.

To me the story of Easter in the New Testament is the story of such a great leap forward. A sudden awareness of hope. We are told of the disciple’s shattered plans, their despair in the face of stark reality, and then experience with them the reawakening of creative hope. The death of Jesus seemed to be the end of his great mission. Everything had collapsed. The vision of a new Jerusalem had failed, the mission ended in disaster, the project in death. People were in hiding, afraid to show their faces or be identified as followers of Jesus lest they suffer the same fate. Was this the end? The end of all the high hopes, the visions, the joy, the future? Jesus was dead, yes, but his vision, his idea was still there, ready to come alive again in anyone willing to pick it up. The truth was still there to be told. It had lost the vitality, the charisma of a living public speaker, that was all. Maybe they were not as good as Jesus was, but could they do it? Could they carry the vision?

I have often wondered what it is that makes us humans identify an idea, a truth, a vision with a particular person. Usually, but not always, it is the originator of the idea, the person who first formed a vision into words and made it understandable to the wider public. It makes little difference to our approach what the nature of that idea or vision is. We could take any scientific, technological, philosophical, social or spiritual innovative idea as an example. Newton and Gravity, Darwin and evolution, Freud and Psychoanalysis, Einstein and Relativity, Karl Marx and Communism, Francis Crick and the double Helix or, if you are a music lover, Karl Haas and his Adventures in good Music. By the way, did you know Haas died last month? He was 91 years old. His unique style of presentation gave classical music a common touch and made his program for many years the most listened to in the whole world. I wonder if someone will pick up the vision he had of introducing people to the art, the science and the philosophy that is music. Our mind seems to need a physical body to attach an abstract idea to before we can objectively consider and work with it in the real world. Maybe it is a programming deficiency in our human make-up where we, even today, are still unable to make sense of totally abstract concepts such as God, infinity, eternity or nothingness. Many stories attest to how difficult it was in times gone by for the figure Zero and other imaginary numbers to be accepted by the public. Perhaps it is this hang-over from our primitive origin, where sight and touch first shaped mind-and-hand coordination, that still lingers below the surface in our mind. A hangover that makes us believe that we can destroy an idea if we kill the person who formulated it. Experiments with primitive animals seem to confirm this "out of sight, out of mind" concept. But our mind does not work that way, at least not anymore. In today’s society you can not kill an idea anymore by eliminating its creator. It has a life of its own.

It was Richard Dawkins who back in 1975 gave a name to the concept of a thought expressed, as something alive in its own right. Anything once spoken, written or portrayed in a socially recognisable form will persist, even when disconnected from its creator. Dawkins called this imaginary entity a Meme, a play on the words of memory and gene. Just like the gene in a seed can germinate, grow into a plant and multiply, a meme can lie dormant for a long time, but once it finds itself in a fertile environment, is recognised by a receptive mind, it too will grow and multiply and spread though-out society. That’s why an idea, once born, cannot be wished away by killing its creator.

After three days of hiding in despair the followers of Jesus lifted up their eyes, stopped wailing, looked around and noticed an open door, (as Dieter Ruff used to say) a way to continue the mission without the man. It took the finality of the tomb and the torn hands of Jesus to overcome the doubts in his followers that there is a better way and there was a need to show people that way. It did awaken in them the slumbering awareness of Jesus’ message, of something greater than physical death. Something they had not really understood when Jesus told them while he was still alive. Back then they felt it was Jesus’ vision, not theirs; His prerogative to preach it, to practice it. It did not matter that they did not understand what it was all about, and why they had to believe; why to believe was even more important than to know. But now, here, totally lost and afraid, they saw it, they saw the need and that they were not alone in their need. The same need is in every man, woman and child, to believe in a future for themselves and their endeavours. It is a pre-requisite to making life liveable. It is a need as real as hunger, as pressing as the bodily necessities, as vital as the salt of the Earth: It is the freedom of belief in a meaning of life for each individual. All the cruelty and all the suffering in the world cannot diminish the measure of this need. It only reinforces it and makes the lack of it the more apparent. We are not talking here about the sacrosanct belief in the right of human life, nor liberty or happiness, but about something which may be entirely a human attribute, the need to believe in a value for yourself, of you as a person, a meaning that gives life a purpose and stimulates our mind to think positive. The philosopher Daniel Dennet in his book Freedom Evolves traces this need through evolution and defines it as "the capacity to achieve what is of value to the individual...". The apostles saw this value centred around a God-fearing lifestyle and a belief in eternal life. In time this stepping stone became a doctrine and the reason for the need to believe forgotten. Our unique ability to reconsider what is of value to us may seem a fearful prospect to some, opening the gates to lawlessness and anarchy, but social environments tend to guide us to a stable balance between the two extremes of seeking shelter on the one side and needing elbow room on the other. We can look ahead beyond what is immediately visible, and plan for the possible beyond the automated animal instinct.

Archeologists tell us that something very special began to happen to our species around 40,000 years ago. Not so much a biological change but a change in culture. Some call it The Great Leap Forward. Earlier man-made artefacts had hardly changed for a million years. No paintings, no carvings, no grave goods and no ornamentations. After the Leap all those things suddenly appeared in the archeological records, together with musical instruments and stunning cave murals. So significant was this step in our evolution that a casual observer looking back on history in a million years from now might see our modern culture, with all its freeways, computers, supersonic planes and space exploration, as merely an afterthought to that Great Leap Forward in homo sapiens’ cultural evolution 40,000 years ago. All our modern achievements, from the Sistine Chapel to General Relativity, from Bach to Bartok, could be seen as part of this same revolution that then burst forth from the earlier stagnation.

Richard Dawkins (whom we met before with the meme) in his latest book "A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Life" wonders about the cause of this sudden stimulation to the human mind. With no physical and biological changes evident at the time, he theorises that it could have been a seemingly insignificant trick of grammar in the primitive language of our ancestors, such as the conditional clause, which, at a stroke, would have allowed a "what if" imagination to flower in our brain. Whereas before, people could only talk about things that were there, visible in the scene before them, now referential language allowed them to use words as token of things that were not immediately present. A small step in hindsight, but it just may have been the bridge to representational art, the ability to draw a two-dimensional bison on a cave wall or recognise an abstract idea detached from its creator. In an environment of primitive mentality this truly was a miracle.

Such a miracle was also the realisation by the apostles that with their recognition of the substance of Jesus’ message, Jesus effectively had returned to them, as if resurrected from the grave; real in his vision, his words and his commandments, enough so for them to suddenly understand the meaning of his mission. The abstract concepts of love and trust of God, neighbour and enemy became real to them through their awareness of the need to believe in them. And in this new-found expansion of reality their teacher had become real again; real enough to guide them for the seven weeks it took until they were confident enough to walk alone. Has this evolutionary leap in abstract thinking, the need for a belief in a creative meaning for life, introduced a new era in human history? We know it has, but we also know it had a 2000 year long, painful struggle for understanding and acceptance, a time full of well-meaning ignorance and misrepresentation. Some of which is still with us today.

Bishop Spong, who has written many books on practical Christianity, believes that it is not only the Roman Catholic Church but the whole Christian philosophy that is in need of serious reform. He says our faith is badly compromised by ancient tribal mentalities. In the Scriptures Christians were taught to think of themselves always in minority images, oppressed and persecuted. They were destined to be the 'saving remnant;' the 'salt of the earth' that flavoured the soup; the 'leaven in the lump' of dough that gave its yeast to the bread, the 'light of a single candle' that shined in the midst of an overwhelming darkness. Then, following Constantine's Edict of Milan in 313 CE, Christianity became the dominant religion of the western world, and Christians began to feel that it was their duty to create uniformity within the church and to impose a uniform belief on those outside. Conflict arises in the world of religion whenever a system decides that it has captured the Ultimate Truth. Ultimate truth should really be classed with all the other abstract impossibilities I have listed before. It is just another form of fundamentalism. We must beware of religious fundamentalism, for it has little to do with truth, religious or otherwise. It is rather a security seeking, defence mechanism used by frightened people, and arises out of an attempt to artificially pacify our inner need for knowledge with certainty, a certainty the world will not, it cannot provide. That is also why there is such anger in fundamentalists, as well as great hostility toward those who are not, by their definition "true believers". Bishop Spong, in talking about religious maturity, makes the point succinctly: If you attempt to convert a fundamentalist to your point of view you will not succeed, not because the arguments you use are somehow lacking in persuasiveness, but because you have failed to understand the true nature of fundamentalism, which has nothing to do with religion

Let us sing the hymn "Grosser Gott wir loben dich..." all three verses.

It is in the nature of human self-consciousness to seek the source of our life. That experience is so deep that I am not sure there is such a thing as a nonreligious human being. Some may reject a particular religious content but none that fail to raise the ultimate questions that create our various religious answers. Yes, the track of religious progress in the last 2000 years is difficult to define. But then, who are we to say. Cultural evolution took 40,000 years from cave paintings to computers. The flight of a butterfly in the air is most erratic and yet, there too is meaning and purpose in its path. Christoph Hoffmann’s original vision of a Reich Gottes in Jerusalem, has also evolved erratically in the 140 since then, sufficiently so to be still relevant to us as an attitude to life, a journey of discovery. Today we realise, at least I think we Templers have realised, that Christianity for its survival does not need such wonders as a virgin birth for a joyous Christmas or the cruelty of a crucifixion to contemplate compassion, nor a bodily resurrection for a Happy Easter or a Pentecostal ascension of Jesus for our belief, anymore.

That to me is today’s message of Easter. A reminder not to loose sight of our most precious endowment, a gift God gave to humanity that enables us to visualise something, a better world, beyond the immediate presence. A belief in the power of our mind, forged by millennia of evolution, to cope with the physical adversities of nature and the cruelty of natural selection and make disasters into stepping stones to a better understanding. The disciples did it. We would not be here were we not similarly equipped to live with them.

Music Monika Strasser.

The proceeds of today’s collection is dedicated to the Borromäer Sister in Jerusalem.

Thank you all for sharing this morning with me. I hope you have a happy and safe Easter time. and thank you to the Bentleigh kids for handing out the Easter surprises.

return to the top

 

Good Friday Service - Bayswater 25th March

Elder Theo Richter

Good morning to you all, and welcome to our Good Friday Service on this glorious sunny day.
Last week as we sat in this same chapel, we heard the words of my fellow elder Harald Ruff as he spoke of the events in the latter days of Jesus’ life as he approached the Holy city of Jerusalem. I sat in my usual position on the left side of the chapel so that I could get that commanding view through the large glass windows of the beautiful green trees and the shimmering blue of the mountains beyond. In that position, I am at liberty to contemplate the words being spoken whilst at the same time, am presented with a vista that elevates the spirit and allows one to fully appreciate the beauty that is Gods earth.
On Sunday, as we prepared for the festivities of the Sommerfest, Harald spoke of Jesus’ entry into the Temple of Jerusalem and the events that unfolded as he took in the scene of avarice and vice, of shambles and disorder that the Pharisee’s had allowed become of this once great edifice to God. In a fit of rage, he cast out the money lenders, the merchants and their customers, overturning their tables and scattering their merchandise on the floor. When the Pharisee’s heard of this they came running, demanding to know who had given Jesus the authority to cast out the traders. Jesus replied, “It is written in the scriptures ‘My Temple is to be a place of prayer for all nations’, but you have turned it into a den of thieves.”
The Pharisee’s, whose authority had at last been deliberately confronted by Jesus, now saw no other alternative but to plan how best to get rid of him. They realised that they could no longer allow Jesus to act out his mission because it was now directly and openly in conflict with their own well established order and threatened the very core of their values - wealth, prestige and power.
And thus were cast the roles that, under the circumstances of Gods plan of salvation for mankind, would lead to the death of Jesus of Nazareth; the Christ; the Son of God.
As our Good Friday Service unfolds, I would like to call you to join in singing the Hymn, “O Haupt voll Blut und Wunden”; “O sacred head, now wounded” which is on page 81 of the Templer Hymnbook. We will sing verses 1, 9 and 10.
Mark hymn 66
Our text today is taken from Matthew 27, verses 1 to 30.
The words of our hymn "o sacred head, now wounded' spring to mind as we contemplate the passage that we have just heard.
O sacred head now wounded,
With pain and scorn weighed down,
In mockery surrounded
With thorns thine only crown:
O sacred head, what glory,
What bliss, till now, was thine!
Yet thought despised and gory
I joy to call thee mine.
This first verse combines the many sentiments I feel when I think of the events that took place a little over two millenniums ago.
I see Jesus as he started his mission, as a young teacher, filled with the need to spread his message - Gods message - to all mankind. The healing; the preaching; the travels far and wide. Good company. Fellowship. All hallmarks of companionship and adventure combined in a life lead in the spirit of revolution, of mighty ideals and soaring desires. Living on the edge of society, contemporary in outlook and mindful of the need to change a great many entrenched 'isms' in a very short space of time. The crowds, the disciples, the need to embrace everyone in the wonderful, merciful arms of Gods embrace.
In the middle, the slow realisation that the fateful day of reckoning steadily approaching. The mood swings - high elation and low black despair. The need for peace and solitude away from those who seek and adulate him. Temptation! The fight with the inner man who seeks on the one hand, flight from what is destined, on the other, humble acceptance that his fate lies in the hand of God. Fight! Flight! The two most core instincts of man - self preservation at all cost. And yet, he had to be above this. He was the Son of God. The Lamb. The Sacrifice.
And in the end, the dreariness, the weight of mankind resting on his shoulder. Acquiescence and acceptance - no longer able to resist the pull of destiny, no longer able to resist the path that God had planned for him. Misunderstanding! Mockery! Despair!
Today is Good Friday. On this day, we remember the events that lead to the death of a man whom we know as Jesus of Nazareth.
To understand the death of Jesus and its meaning to us as Christians, we must first explore the life of Jesus, and in so doing we must go to the beginning of Biblical time - to the creation of this world.
Here we will find answers to the paradox that was the man, Jesus Christ.
‘....But the Lord God gave man this warning, “You may eat of any fruit in this garden except from the Tree of Conscience, for its fruit will open your eyes to make you aware of right and wrong; good and bad. If you eat its fruit, you are doomed to die.”‘ (Genesis 2: 16-17)
We all know of this Biblical story and of its consequences. Coerced by the serpent, Adam and Eve ate of the fruit of the Tree of Conscience and they lost their innocence and became aware of the world. When next the Lord God came to visit, they hid from him. To his question as to why, Adam replied,”I heard you coming and didn’t want you to see me naked. So I hid.”
Knowing that the perfection of Eden had been tainted, God expelled Man, and as punishment sent him to farm the earth from whence he had come.
In the Garden of Eden, there were two trees - one was the ‘Tree of Life’ and the other was the ‘Tree of Conscience’.
The Tree of Conscience bore the fruits which elevated man into the realm of God - the ability to acknowledge the difference between good and bad. In forbidding man to eat from the fruit, God sought to protect Mankind from himself. The innocence of Man was lost because he was now able to determine his future and make conscious, rational decisions about his own destiny. In this sense, mankind had stepped above the other animals in Eden in that he could now follow trains of thought which moved him beyond the level of coexistence with his fellow creatures, making him dominant.
The Tree of Life, the second tree, bore the fruits of everlasting Life. To eat from its fruits would further elevate man into the realm of God, making him as much one as him, as he was himself.
In our Biblical story, God expelled mankind from his Eden - his place of innocence. In the hiding of his nakedness not only from God, but from himself, man had broken the perfect bond. Innocence was sacrificed; trust was betrayed, and because this had come between them, and because man could not control or understand his level of consciousness, God sought to remove his creation from the further temptation of the Tree of Life. Because man had reached this level of understanding, it was clear that he would no longer need the serpent to tempt him - Man could now tempt himself. And to have eaten from its fruits would have condemned mankind to an eternal life of hell.
This then, is where the concept of ‘Original sin’ began.
The millennia passed. As generation followed generation, mankind toiled on the earth, no longer lavishing in the abundance that was Eden. What had been a life of innocence and plenty now became one of hard work and struggle.
During this time, God watched and waited. From his distance, he steered man because he loved him and because he could forgive him. And within the heart of mans being, there stirred the flame of memory. Surely there was more to life than mere existence? What was it we had lost that was so greatly treasured?
Sometimes, during this period, a man would come who seemed wiser and closer to this lost memory. The Bible remembers them - Moses, Noah, David, John - these men who seemed to communicate directly with God, and they became his weapons - leaders who would rouse the people to follow them, and in so doing, to follow God Himself. Through these leaders came the prophecy - that one day, God would forgive mankind and would welcome him back into his fold.
And so, mankind began to understand that a Messiah would come; a Christ who would break the terminal bond with the earth and would bring him back to his rightful place beside God.
The Bible tells us that Jesus was born in a manger - a food trough for cattle feed. From the very beginning, His was a life marked as special by the hand of God. All of the scriptures and gospels written about him contain the one single message - that he was sent to redeem mankind in the eyes of God.
Before this can even be expanded on, we need to understand the purpose of Jesus’ life.
“I have come as a light to shine in this dark world so that all who put their trust in me will no longer wander in the darkness. If anyone hears me and doesn’t obey me, I am not his judge - for I have come to save the world and not to judge it.” (John 13:46-47)
In all that he said and did, Jesus sought only to bring love and hope. Where he found pain, he healed; where he saw grief; he soothed; where he felt loss; he restored. This is perhaps the crux of his life.
Within him lay the power of the Lord God. There was nothing he could not do and yet he used this power with a wisdom not seen before in any other. Through his teachings, he sought to change man from the path of mere existence that he followed, to one of higher ideals and reason. His parables always explained what God held for mankind. Most importantly, they sought to enlighten and uplift; to draw people above their present state of consciousness.
The last is the most important statement made so far - to draw mankind above his present level of consciousness. In Jesus, we find the truth of Gods intentions.
Jesus was sent to teach man the understanding of his consciousness - to steer his thoughts and decisions back to the pure path that led to God. Jesus was the living proof of Gods laws in action and through him; we see the first movement toward forgiveness and the reunion between man and God.
In Luke, we read: One day the Pharisees asked Jesus,”When will the Kingdom of God begin?” Jesus replied,”The Kingdom of God isn’t ushered in with visible signs. You won’t be able to say it has begun in this place, or in that part of the country? For the Kingdom of God is within you.”
And so, we come to the purpose of the celebration that is Good Friday.
There are three texts which I would like to offer as explanation.
The first part of the answer lies in our knowledge that Jesus was offered to man as the conduit through which we could once again live in open communication with God. It is expressed so clearly in the words of Jesus taken from John 17:22-23, “You have sorrow now, but I will see you again, and then you will rejoice: and no one can rob you of that joy. At that time, you won’t need to ask me for anything, for you can go directly to the Father and ask him, and He will give you what you ask for because you use my name.”
Mankind, for the first time since his expulsion from Eden, was forgiven by God, and was allowed free and open access to his Kingdom.
The second part lies in the text of John 6:27, “But you shouldn’t be so concerned about perishable things like food. No, spend your energy seeking the eternal life that I, the Messiah can give you. For God the Father has sent me for this very purpose.”
God has seen fit to offer us the fruits of the Tree of Life - an eternal life by his side in the Kingdom of Heaven.
The third and perhaps most important part of the answer lies in Luke 9:23, ’Then he said to all, “Anyone who wants to follow must put aside his own desires and conveniences and carry his cross with him every day and keep close to me.” ’
Jesus did not die for a blank mass of humanity, but rather, he died for mankind as a fellowship of individuals - people like you and I - every one of us accountable for our part in the search for truth and the realisation of Gods Kingdom on earth.
Each one of us here seeks our own communion with God. Though we follow different paths, and seek at different levels of consciousness, we are charged by God and by Jesus to carry our own cross; to make our own peace directly with God, and to reach our own highest level of understanding. God opens this gateway and beacons us, but we are asked to come in of our own volition - so that the understanding between God and ourselves is of the same magnitude as his original love for us.
There is a reading that I have used before that speaks volumes for we who seek God’s enlightened kingdom on this earth. It is taken from my favourite Gospel: John 9: 35-39.
When Jesus heard what had happened, he found the man and said, “Do you believe in the Messiah?”
The man answered, ‘Who is he, Sir, for I want to.’
‘You have seen him,’ Jesus said, ‘and he is speaking to you!’
‘Yes, Lord,’ the man said, ‘I believe!’ And he worshipped Jesus.
Then Jesus told him, ‘I have come into this world to give sight to those who are spiritually blind and to show those who think they see, that they are blind.’
In this reading we learn a truth. Our search for the higher levels of consciousness that Jesus sought to bring us is never over. Just as we uncover one mystery, so another awaits us. The search for Gods truth is challenging. There can be no ‘right answer’ because if we latch onto one level of understanding, so we lock out all other levels. Thus, we risk remaining stationary in our spiritual development.
There are times when we feel comfortable with what we believe in, but usually some other influence comes along which sets us on a whole new level of searching. The danger that we need to be aware of comes from the feeling of complacency and comfort when we believe we have the right answer. Very much as Jesus says in the reading, “I have come........ to show those who think they see, that they are blind.”
Let us pray.
There is one final point that must be said in our service today.
It is tradition that we celebrate Good Friday in a tone of sombreness and sobriety because today marks the passing of Jesus from the physical world into the realm of Gods Kingdom. The yoke he carried and the suffering that he endured brought about the salvation of mankind.
However, the death of Jesus on the cross also gave us something to rejoice about. Through his death, mankind was released from the enslavement wrought by years of punitory worship. No longer could a Priest or Pharisee or any other order the offering of gifts or wealth in order to gain the ear of God. Jesus' death, in one single blow, broke the shackles that prevented mankind from openly communing with God directly and did away with the need for interference or regulation by a second party.
In Jerusalem, in the holy Temple of the old city, there is a room called the ‘Holy of the Holies’. This room is separated from the Temple proper by a heavy curtain, thus marking the line where the earthly realm ends and the Heavenly realm begins.
It is said that this room was reserved by God for himself.
At the precise moment when Jesus died, this curtain was split apart from top to bottom. And freed mankind forever from the yoke of spiritual enslavement.
And so, we embark on another Easter. This is a time where we remember the blackness and despair of Jesus' death on the cross. We reflect on his sacrifice so that we may live in the radiance of Gods embrace, free to worship, unencumbered.
And with Easter, we also take part in a ritual that has been with mankind since time immemorial - we celebrate in the warmth and comfort of our friends and family. Easter is a time of giving, of sharing, of family gatherings and of rejoicing. We watch our little children as they race in pursuit of the Easter Bunnies hidden treasures. We exchange boiled eggs in a tribute of the pagan fertility festival that is so closely intertwined in our Christian celebrations. We talk, we eat and we share good cheer and good company.
And it is in this light that I would like to finish our service today. Jesus did not die on the cross for us to despair. His was a greater objective - an ideal that sought to teach mankind to love one another, to live together in harmony and to go placidly in the peace of Gods divine light.
We, as the successors of the many Christians who have gone before us, are charged with keeping that faith, of keeping that ideal alive in the hearts of all whom we meet and of all whom we interact with. God Bless us all.
Our collection today will go to whose tireless work with those less fortunate that us is an unending task. Please give generously.
I thought we could conclude our Good Friday Service with a hymn that leaves us with a lighter heart. We shall sing the hymn ‘Lord of the Dance’.
The Hymn is number 66 in the Templer Hymnbook. We shall sing all five verses.
Before we do so however, may I extend my best wishes to all of you and your families, and may you have a very happy and joyful Easter break. Thank you for listening.

Return to the top

 

CV Service Rupanyup, Sunday March 6, 2005

Elder, Chista Lingham

I would like to welcome you all to our home today. This year we managed to get the date right and not clash with the long weekend. I would like to thank all of you, who have traveled along distance for making the journey.

Today’s lesson is taken from the Old Testament – from the Book of Jeremiah. My first reaction was - who was Jeremiah? The internet is great for finding out all sorts of useful or irrelevant information and I found possible character readings on Jeremiah – (tongue in cheek):

Jeremiah was depressed and suicidal

Jeremiah was emotionally unstable, alarmist, negative and always lamenting things

Jeremiah was a prophet who lived during the last part of the seventh century and the early part of the sixth century BC. It is thought he started his ministry early in life possibly less than 20 years old. At this time the world was full of wars as new empires conquered the old ones. The tiny kingdom of Judah was caught in the middle and during his lifetime Babylonia conquered Judah and ended its freedom as a nation. This was a process that involved several stages and Jeremiah prophesised during the reign of a number of kings: Jehoahaz, Jehoiakim, Jehoiachin, Zedekiah, and during the brief rule of Gedaliah ben Ahikam. The assassination of Gedaliah ben Ahikam in ca. 585 BCE put a final end to the remnant of the Jewish community in Judah and Jerusalem and symbolized the conclusion of the First Temple period. The turbulence of this time may be why Jeremiah’s prophecies spoke of destruction and inevitable disaster.

Jeremiah is said to have been a sensitive man who deeply loved his people and who hated to have to pronounce judgement on them. In many passages he spoke of deep emotion about the things he suffered because God had called him to be a prophet. He started his prophetic mission in his native village of Anathoth but was rejected by the villagers. He warned God’s people about the catastrophe that was to befall them because of their both idolatry and sins (specifically turning their back on God and the teachings in the Torah). Possibly to try and avoid the worst of the catastrophe he advocated for surrender to Babylonia and not to attempt a rebellion against its power and strength under the auspices of Egypt. This was considered a defeatist attitude and rejected by both the people and the kings during whose reigns Jeremiah uttered his prophecies. This was due to the concept stated by Isaiah about 100 years previously that both Jerusalem and the Temple held an almost magical endurance/permanence. It would never be destroyed; (Isaiah 39 – 66 Isaiah speaks the Lord’s message to Hezekiah). They forgot however, the premise on which this was founded – that the people worshipped only God and behaved as he taught them. During the reign of Zedekiah, Jeremiah was placed in detention until the destruction of Jerusalem and Temple by the Babylonians and the exile to Babylonia of Judah’s King and many of the people. He saw the shattering of the last hope for the survivors of the destruction in the murder of Gedaliah, whom the Babylonians had appointed to rule over Judah. Although Jeremiah was saliently a prophet of apocalypse, he emphasized the temporary nature of the destruction and the consolation to be found in the certainty of the nation's return to its land.

Today’s lesson is from a letter Jeremiah wrote to the people in exile: Chapter 29 verses 4-9

Read text

The people taken into exile were the king Jeconiah, his mother, the palace officials, the leaders of Judah and Jerusalem, the priests and all the skilled workers. This was because it was judged that it would be from among these people those who could lead and fit out a rebellion would come. It was hoped by tame submission the king of Babylonia would be pacified. However the Babylonians returned and took away more of the elders, priests, prophets and others that the king and his soldiers could catch. These people, like all in those circumstance were melancholy and probably had a bad case of the "why me" and envied those that were left behind.

In the letter Jeremiah is telling the people in exile, that God sent them in to exile (‘allowed then to be carried away’) and that the exile would be a long one. As with all people who are displaced or exiled the people longed to return home and the thought that their God – the almighty lord had allowed this happen would not an easy idea to take. What the people in exile wanted to hear was that the exile would be short, the that God would deliver them from exile sooner than later, because He had not wanted them to be taken at all. There were people among them – the false prophets mentioned that were telling them what they wanted to hear. The exile was only to last one or two years. However, in this letter God through Jeremiah is telling them that the length of exile would be long – the next verse (verse 10) is

" The Lord says, ’When Babylonia’s seventy years are over, I will show my concern for you and keep my promise to bring you back home.’ "

Because the exile is to be long, the people are told to settle down and to accept what has happened. By building houses, plant crops and gardens and have families and to make the best of the exile, the people can still have enjoyment of their life. The waiting for return from exile is made easier by not constantly wondering when exile was to end, and continually asking when the time of exile would end. In such a situation all are happier if the necessities and comforts of life are provided. By having families, they were not preserving only preserving their line, heritage and religion; they were also increasing their number among the Babylonians. They may even become powerful among the Babylonians.

As well as settling down, they were to continue to worship God and to listen to him and to follow His teachings and laws. In other words, they were to mend their ways, because it was through not doing these things that God had allowed the Babylonians to conquer Judah and to take them into exile. While the King of Babylonia protected them, they were to lead quiet, peaceable lives under him, in all godliness and honesty. They should also pray for the welfare of Babylonia while they were there, as this would assure their peaceful, fruitful lives. This also the first mention of the idea that one should pray for and love ones enemies. This is a teaching that is found in the gospels of the New Testament, particularly Matthew 5:44.

True religion can be said to teach patient submission not incitement to rebellion. It is the idea that God will help you when time is right, but in the mean time help your self to the best life you can have even though it may fall short of what you want. The false prophets and fortune tellers mentioned in the text, are the ones causing strife as they are telling the people what they want to hear and what they (by that I mean the fortune tellers and false prophets) themselves are perhaps wishing for. It is true that the easiest time to be deceived is at that time when the wish for something to happen/occur. One can easily imagine that this is the case with the Judaeans in exile who are wishing to be released and back in their homeland. In uncertain times, whether politically or in our own lives, the wish to know what is going to happen in the future is great. Sometimes just to know that things are going to end well (in general that is the way we wish them too) can be overwhelming. I think it was that way for those in exile. What is required by all of us in those times is patience. We need to live through those times and to trust in God that it will end well, although it may not be the way we would want them to. The people of Judah in exile at least had notice that that the exile would last 70 years and therefore to the believers a certain end was known. This is not always the case for us, where the outcome and the arrival of the outcome is unknown.

We can see parallels in our own lives and history. During the twentieth century the Temple Society and its members saw many changes and faced many challenges. From what I understand of our history, the maxim of going on with your life and making the best of the situation has been a major thread. It is as if all our forebears have read the passage and acted on it.

Although I only know of the time in internment of the Templers in Australia during the Second World War 2, from tales, I think that it definitely shows a practical application of out lesson for the day. They did they best to continue their customary community life and continued in their faith. A school was established and people worked together to make and improvise the things that were necessary for a more comfortable life. This is not to say that life was not difficult, but they did make the best of things, just as God asked those in exile to do. At least those in exile knew that they would be there for 70 years, those in internment had no such certainty, nor did they know what awaited them at the end of the war.

The challenge our grandparents and our parents faced at the end of the Second World War was to build on the original teachings of the society, without the advantage of living in a closed community. There was no chance of returning to Palestine and living in the colonies there. The original idea that the best place to seek God’s Kingdom was in Palestine was no longer feasible. In both Germany and Australia there was not the possibility of living in closed communities such as in those in Palestine where the practice of the religion in daily life with like-minded people was not possible. They have managed this with our communities and it is up to all of us to contribute to the life of the Templer community. In fact it is a condition of membership to actively take part in the Community life

For those of us who have moved a way from the main communities, this can be difficult. In a way we are living in exile – as in exile form the main communities. If we take a very active part in the life of the Temple Society, we cannot live and thrive within the communities in which we live. People often say that one can always organise to come to important events, but this can be challenging, even impossible to do. Especially if you settle in an area and take an active part in the life,

For example: I look at the weekend of Sommerfest – I know when this usually is, so put a tentative date in the diary. My family all play sport, a couple of teams have made the tennis Grand Final- guess when? Yes, the Saturday before Sommerfest. Then, in previous years the boys have been involved in the Fire Brigade tournament, we had given them permission to compete again, before we found out the date of the tournament – yes it turns out that is the Sunday of Sommerfest. Next, an invitation arrived to compete in a Tennis Tournament on the same Sunday and finally, there is a football practice match on the same day.

It was at this point I realised there was elders seminar on the Friday prior to Sommerfest - the night of the Rural Women’s dinner, hosted this year by the Kinder committee, and an important event in the social life of the women in the area. The Saturday night is the meeting of the next confirmation group. So there is my dilemma – my family and I have got involved in our local community, because that is where we live. Our text tells that we must do what we can enjoy our lives and we have done this. But by doing this, other things that are important to me and things I need to do can cause conflict. And it is not just myself who wants to go to Sommerfest; the boys would like to go too. At this stage, it looks like I may go to Sommerfest by myself, and the driving force - there is the meeting of the next confirmation group on the Saturday night. I have found that those are meetings I need to be at, because though a summary of the meeting notes is given, the details may not always be passed on. As Sam will do most of his lessons from home and not in classes, like most of his group, I won’t get much chance to talk to other parents about the details. Therefore, if I want to have any input, I need to be at the meeting. I am aware, that otherwise I would not make the journey, which for us is at least four hours drive, and like in some previous years when there has been a clash, go to all the events up here that I should be at.

The point I am trying to make that if I went to all the events in the Templer communities in Melbourne that I should be at ( or even would like to be at), I would not be settled here and enjoying life. I hesitate to say making the best of things, because it is not that, and there is just so much more to life and decisions to be able to put events in those terms. I do not know what the future holds – it may be that some day I live closer to Melbourne, but for now my life is here.

The desire to know the future is another part of today’s lesson. Jeremiah was warning his people about believing those people who are forecasting a speedy end to the exile. Prophets when delivering messages from God tend to do more than just tell what is happening in the future, there is also the message that they must live their lives according to God’s wish. Earlier in the Book of Jeremiah, there is the warning that unless the people would mend their ways, they (Judah and Jerusalem) would be defeated. Again their time in exile would not be hard, if they lived as God had asked them to. At the end of the day, what ever is foretold, will only happen if a person lives their life according to God’s will. In this day and age there are no prophets that we recognise. However, there are many who claim to foretell the future. It is hard avoid their views and fore telling of the future as these tend to be in the papers and magazines. The prevalence of fortune tellers and clairvoyants makes us easy to be tempted to find out what the future holds. I must admit I do read these columns and the thing I notice is that there seem to be as many who are not accurate and sometimes described as charlatans and may be described as false prophets. The other point that is made that unless you go and live your life to the best of your ability, the future foretold may not happen. Sitting, waiting and hoping will not make the future happen, you must be out there living your life to the full. It is the old saying that "God helps those you help themselves" appears to be true for all aspects of our life.

Part of my life here is taking part in the interchurch events run locally. Last Friday was the World Day of Prayer, this is an interdenominational service of prayer and fellowship shared with people from more than 170 countries. You may be aware that the Bentleigh community hosted this event this year. This year the theme was ‘Let Our Light Shine’ and was prepared by the Christian Women of Poland. Originally I was thinking of using a prayer from the service, but none really fitted with today’s text. Instead, I have found that Psalm 43 ties it together well. Let us pray.

Return to the top

 

SUNDAY SERVICE - TTHA
20th February 2005
Elder: Hermann Uhlherr
Pianist Irene Blaich
Guten Morgen,
Mein Name ist Hermann Uhlherr, und ich bin im Ältestendienst der Tempelgesellschaft Australien tätig. Unser heutiges Thema befasst sich mit dem Vertrauen in – und dem Glauben an Gott.
Wir singen zu Beginn den Choral: Nr. 120 (schwarzes Gesangbuch) Verse: 1,2,4,5 (Lobe den Herrn)
Unser Text steht im Matthäus Evangelium – Kapitel 6, V. 25-34.
Für Templer sind das Worte mit denen wir uns gut identifizieren können, wollen oder sollten. Sie sind ein Eckstein unseres Glaubens.
Das Tempel Leitwort –
“Trachtet am ersten nach dem Königreich Gottes und nach seiner Gerechtigkeit und alles Andere wird euch zuteil werden!” – sagt wir sollen ganz einfach in Gott vertrauen, Gottes Kräfte erkennen und sie auf uns und unsere Lebensweise einwirken zu lassen, ohne Bedingungen oder Vorbehälte. Wir sollen uns nicht sorgen für den morgigen Tag und um das was wir essen oder trinken werden.
Jedoch wie oft machen wir uns große Sorgen gerade um unsere Gesundheit, unsere Existenz, Besitz und Gut, und das vielleicht manchmal ganz ohne einen Grund?
Jesu Aufforderung spricht jeden einzelnen Menschen an, egal welche Religion oder Hautfarbe er hat. Doch wie schwierig ist es für uns, dieser Aufforderung zu folgen! Die tägliche Existenz und das Materielle im Leben beherrscht die meisten Menschen heute. Sie suchen Bequemlichkeit und streben nach Erfolg, und haben wenig oder keine Zeit für Gott. Sorgen und Angst um die eigene Person machen Viele krank und Viele haben deshalb keinen Platz in ihrem Leben für ihre Mitmenschen oder Gott.
In der heutigen Zeit leben viele Menschen ohne Gott, oder glauben vielleicht ohne Gott zu leben, auch wenn sie nicht direkt als ‘Gottesleugner’ gelten wollen, oder keiner Religionsgemeinschaft angehören. Menschen die so wenig an eine höhere Macht glauben; daß sie nur auf ihre eigenen Kräfte bauen wollen, ihr ganzes Glück und Leben auf materiellen Besitz aufbauen, ihre ganzen Sorgen dem eventuellen Verlust dieser Güter gelten, werden genauso Prüfungen im Leben bestehen müssen, wie andere mehr gläubig. Denn es kommt einmal die Zeit wo unsere eigenen Kräfte nicht ausreichen, wo unsere Schwächen und Mängel uns nur zu deutlich werden. Wenige Menschen suchen Gott nur weil sie so rein und “heilig” veranlagt sind.
Meistens suchen wir Gott dann, wenn wir ihn brauchen. Jedoch finde ich es beruhigend, daß Gott scheinbar bereit ist, uns in dem Moment zu helfen, wo wir einsehen, daß wir es allein nicht schaffen, und daß wir Hilfe brauchen, und unser ganzes Vertrauen in Gott zeigen und uns bewußt an Gott wenden.
Seit der Flutwellen-Katastrophe im Indischen Ozean wurde vielfach die Frage gestellt, wie kann ein gütiger, liebender Gott so etwas zulassen? Huntertausende Menschen haben ihr Leben oder ihre Existenz verloren, scheinbar völlig schuldlos und ohne daß sie “sozusagen” “das verdient haben”. Diese Frage ist schwierig, sie kann gar nicht beantwortet werden, wenn man Gott als ein Wesen, als eine Gestalt versteht, die unendlichen Einfluss auf alles Geschehen in der Welt hat, ohne daß Menschen persönlich in der Lage sind, irgendetwas dazu zu tun. Bei solch einer Vorstellung könnte tatsächlich die Frage “warum” berechtigt sein.
Wenn aber Gott als ein Begriff, als eine alles durchdringende Kraft verstanden wird, dann sind Naturgeschehen eben genau das und nicht mehr.
Ein Erdbeben, ein Vulkanausbruch, ein Tornado, eine Flutwelle sind ganz natürliche Ereignisse, die im Zyklus, das heißt immer wieder auftraten und durch erklärbare, oft durch vorauszusehende Faktoren verursacht werden.
Das heißt diese Ereignisse haben gar nichts direkt mit Gott zu tun, und sind gleich gar nicht durch seinen “Ärger” mit uns Menschen, als Strafe entstanden.
Machen wir jetzt einen Gedankensprung und fragen uns, wundern uns vielleicht, wie die Menschen bei solch einer Naturkatastrophe wie die Tsunami in Indonesien/Ceylon etc., weltweit nicht nur Mitleid mit den Opfern zeigen, sondern scheinbar zutiefst davon betroffen sind. Kann solch eine Reaktion nicht aus dem, was man als das Göttliche im Menschen bezeichnen kann, stammen? Es ist das Gute, welches tief in jedem Menschen schlummert und durch extreme Geschehnisse oder Umstände erweckt wird.
Ich denke wenn wir immer dieses Mitgefühl für unsere Nachbarn hätten und zeigen würden, dann wäre das ein Zeichen, daß nicht nur das Göttliche im Menschen existiert, sondern wäre ein wichtiger Schritt zum Aufbau des Reich Gottes auf Erden.
Wir erfahren Gottes Wirken unmittelbar in unserem Inneren, als erneuernde und verwandelnde Kraft, und wir begegnen dem Wirken Gottes in Menschen die davon erfaßt und durchdrungen sind – Jesus war in ganz besonderer Weise das beste Beispiel dafür. Mit Gott ist uns alles möglich, auch die innere Haltung, die das Reich Gottes ermöglicht. Denn Gott ist für jeden Einzelnen von uns da, wenn wir veruchen, aufgeschlossen und unvoreingenommen diese durchdringende Kraft wahrzunehmen, auf sie zu horchen und sie vorbehaltlos zu akzeptieren. Jesus war nicht nur der Verfechter der an sich schon vorhandenen oder eigentlich erst durch Ihn bekannt gewordenen “Gott-Ähnlichtkeit” des Menschen, sondern er stellte als Einziger die von keinem anderen Menschen erreichte Gott-Ähnlichkeit in seinem Denken, Wesen und Handeln tatsächlich dar.
Seine Botschaft “Ihr seid der Tempel Gottes und der Geist Gottes wirkt in Euch” – bedeutet daß Gott nicht nur außerhalb, woanders, sondern überall und das heißt auch in uns wirkt; daß er sich nicht nur einige Male in der Vergangenheit in der Weltgeschichte zeigte und dann nie wieder; sondern daß Gott sich immer, überall, zu allen Zeiten und in jedem Menschen, in jedem Lebewesen offenbart; daß Gott auch teil von uns ist und wir Teil von Ihm.
Weiterhin bedeutet es, daß Got sich in uns nicht durch Kleinlichkeit oder Rachsüchtigkeit ausdrückt, sondern im Geist der Liebe und des Vertrauens, ferner daß das Reich Gottes kein jenseitiges Reich sein kann, sondern daß es in uns wachsen kann und dazu bestimmt ist, auf Erden jederzeit Wirklichkeit zu werden.
Nicht zuletzt daß wir, weil Gott in uns wirkt, in steter inneren Harmonie sein können, mit Allem was um uns ist – ; wenn wir in unser Inneres lauschen und im Einklang mit dieser Harmonie handeln, sie sozusagen zu unserem Wegweiser machen; das heißt im Sinne Gottes denken und leben. Wir sehen dann unser menschliches Leben aus einer ganz anderen Perspektive.
Jesus spricht von der Göttlichkeit der Menschen. Diese setzt voraus, daß wir unserer Verantwortung bewußt werden unseren Teil zur Verwirklichung des Reich Gottes auf Erden zu tun.
Es war allein Jesus, der die Menschen nicht nur für fähig und dazu berufen hielt, Gott zu erkennen, sondern sie auch aufforderte “Gott gleich” zu werden. Seine Botschaft bestand in der Tat darin, die Menschen nicht nur zur Suche nach Gott anzuhalten, sondern sie auch zu ermutigen, wie Gott zu handeln und am Ende auch das Göttliche in jedem Menschen zu erkennen, das heißt “eins mit dem Vater zu sein”.
Anders ausgedrückt, wir müssen Gott in uns selbst suchen, und allein unser Wille hinter dem die göttliche Allmacht steht, ist es, der unser Leben und unser Verhältnis zur Umwelt formt – Wir sind frei zu wählen wie wir uns verhalten wollen und es handelt sich dabei nicht darum, daß man Jesus oder Gott etwas Gutes oder einen Gefallen tun will, auch ist es keine Sache der Freundschaft. Wenn wir uns von unserer Umwelt beeinflussen und uns auf dem Wege des geringsten Widerstandes treiben lassen, können wir schlecht wahre Tempel Gottes werden oder sein, in denen Gott lebt und wirkt. Um das zu sein, müssen wir uns ganz von dem Göttlichen in uns leiten lassen oder anders ausgedrückt, wir müssen Gott voll vertrauen.
Nun singen wir vom Lied 78 (schwarz) V. 1,2,3,6 (was Gott tut das ist wohlgetan).
Immer mehr wird erkannt, welche Macht von unserem Denken ausgeht. Aus unseren Gedanken entspringen unsere Worte, unser Sprechen, und unmittelbar auch unser Befinden. Deshalb ist es gut, wenn wir unsere Worte und selbstverständlich unsere Taten auf positive und gute Gedanken und Gefühle aufbauen.
Was wir denken und fühlen führt zu dem was wir tun, also zu konkreten Ereignissen. Unser ganzes Weltbild entsteht aus den Vorstellungen in unserem Kopf – aus unseren Gedanken. Diese bestimmen auch, wie wir die Welt, unsere Umgebung und Mitmenschen sehen, und wie wir uns darin und dazu verhalten.
Nun in unserer Sprache gebrauchen wir ein Wort, einen Namen – Gott – und hiermit haben viele plötzlich Hemmungen oder sogar Schwierigkeiten. Dieses eine Wort hält uns vielleicht davon ab, unsere innersten Probleme oder Sorgen einer größeren Macht mitzuteilen um Kraft, Trost, Mut und eine Richtschnur für unser Leben zu erhalten.
Viele Menschen erfahren die Kraft, die ein inniges Gebet auslösen kann. Beim Beten sprechen wir meistens Gott an. Gibt es Gebete ohne eine solche Ansprache?
Für mich persönlich ist Gott nicht greifbar, er hat keine Gestalt oder erkennbare Form, und ist weder männlich oder weiblich; vielleicht ist die beste Bezeichnung die ich geben kann für mich ist – Gott der Begriff – für eine all umfassende Macht, eine durchdringende Kraft verbunden mit der Schöpfung, dem gesamten Universum, bestehend im kleinsten Atom aber auch in der gewaltigsten Galaxie. Es ist eben nicht möglich für uns Menschen, Gott mit unserem Verstand zu begreifen! Deshalb: Wie wir Gottes Art und Wesen begreifen ist eine sehr persönliche, individuelle Angelegenheit. Jeder Mensch wird und darf Gott so begreifen, wie er selbst in sich seine eigene Art und Wesen erkennt und begreift. Jeder sieht Gott ein bischen anders und erwartet vielleicht auch etwas Anderes von ihm. So steht unser Gottesbegriff im direkten Verhältnis zu unserer eigenen Person. Unser Gottesbegriff aber – das Gott-begreifen – macht keinen Gott, genau so wenig wie ein Wissenschaftler die Naturgesetze macht oder bestimmt. Ich denke wie wir Gott sehen ist auch nichts Endgültiges, sondern das wächst mit unserem Begreifen. Vergessen wir aber nicht – wir leben mit einem Gott, dessen Wesen und Gesetze sich noch nie geändert haben, obgleich die Menscheit verschiedene Vorstellungen zu verschiedenen Zeiten hatten.
Jesus hat uns gezeigt, daß sich die heilbringende Wirkung des Geistes Gottes in uns so weit erstreckt, wie wir persönlich unsere inneren Hindernisse wegräumen wollen und können, soweit wie wir uns lossagen von Sorgen um unser Wohlbefinden und Wohlhaben, und unsere Vorurteile, Mißgunst und Apathie überwiden können.
In einem seiner Sendschreiben ermahnt uns Christoph Hoffmann, das Ewige in der menschlichen Bestimmung nicht aus den Augen zu verlieren. Er ermutigt uns immer etwas über den jetzigen Augenglick hinaus zu blicken, und das richtige Verhältnis des Menschen zu Gott als Voraussetzung zu sehen, für eine Besserung der Zustände unter den Menschen.
“Trachtet am ersten nach dem Reich Gottes und nach seiner Gerechtigkeit – diese Aufforderung von Jesus geht an jeden einzelnen Menschen, aber es ist die Aufgabe jedes Einzelnen, sich so zu verhalten, daß er in einer Gemeinschaft gleichgesinnter wirksam ist.
Wir Templer haben uns in unserer Gemeinschaft zum Ziel gesetzt, an der geistigen und leiblichen Vervollkommnung der Menschen mitzuwirken, um eben dieses Endziel anzustreben.
Unsere anhaltende geistige Entwicklung bedeutet häufige Veränderungen, wie die Verfeinerung unseres Denkens und Verhaltens, und ein Stärken unseres Glaubens. Nun das Erkennen ist oft ein schneller Lichtblick, aber das Tun nach der Erkenntnis dagegen erfordert Zeit, Gedult und Mühe, ohne garantierten Erfolg, und währt lebenslang und fordert persönlichen Einsatz.
Ich glaube allerdings, daß wir wenn wir darum bitten, von einer höheren Macht geleitet und geholfen werden. Aber wie wir handeln, das muß jeder für sich selbst entscheiden und verantworten.
Letzten Endes kann niemand anders unser Leben für uns leben, oder unseren Weg für uns gehen. Außerdem hat im Streben nach Harmonie und Lebenserfüllung, jeder Lebensabschnitt einen anderen Schwerpunkt: jemand älteres hat ganz andere Prioritäten als ein junger Mensch. Der Ältere ist mehr darauf angewiesen, aus sich selbst heraus leben zu können; er hat vielleicht das Gefühl, nicht mehr genügend beansprucht zu sein; er muss seelische Kräfte entwickeln für das Ertragen seelischen Leides, und er lebt mehr von den geistigen Kräften, die er sich in früheren Jahren angeeignet hat.
Ein junger Mensch ist weitaus mehr von seiner Umwelt engangiert, und reagiert auch deshalb ganz anders auf die Fragen von Harmonie und Lebensinhalt. Seine Energie ist verständlicherweise weniger dem seelischen Wachsen und Reifen gewidmet, als dem Existenzaufbauen.
Aber das ändert nichts an der Tatsache, daß jeder einzelne Mensch befähigt und verantwortlich ist, sein Verhalten – das heißt seine Gedanken, seine Worte und sein Wirken so aufeinander abzustimmen, daß er dadurch wächst und seelisch reift. Das gilt in jedem unserer Lebensabschnitte, im Alter sowie in der Jugend.
Wir erfahren, daß ein solches Reifen uns laufend vor Entscheidungen stellt, in wichtigen, sowie in kleineren Dingen. Dafür ist uns der freie Wille gegeben für solche Entscheidungen. Jede gute Wahl festigt uns geistig, jede schlechte verlangsamt unser Reifen. Unser Gewissen – das tief in uns vorhandene Gefühl für das Gute und Rechte – das Urgeistige in jedem Menschen, hilft uns diese Entscheidungen zu fällen. Es ist wohl Das, was Jesus als das Göttliche in uns ansprach, das was uns hilft, das was zum Reich Gottes gehört, zu erkennen und danach zu streben. Unser Erreichen des Reichs Gottes das er verkündete, schätzte Jesus weit höher ein, als die bestehende weltliche Ordnung.
Jedoch denken wir daran wir selbst tragen die Verantwortung für unsere Lebensweise, für unsere Lebensansprüche und somit auch für unsere Teilnahme am Reich Gottes. Sind wir bereit von ganzem Herzen in Gottes Gerechtigkeit und Wirken zu vertrauen und diese vorbehaltlos zu akzeptieren? Durch unsere Grundeinstellung sollten wir eigentlich jederzeit dazu bereit sein.
Wenn uns das gelingt, sind wir Bausteine zu einer Gemeinschaft wie Jesus sie sah, wo jeder Stein den anderen mitträgt,so wie es durch den Geist Gottes in uns bestimmt ist.
Vaterunser.
 Choral: 116 (schwarz) V. 1,2,4 & 5 (Geh aus, mein Herz)

Return to the Top

 

Gippsland Meeting 6 February,
Elder, Theo Richter

Play Enya – Watermark – track 11, ‘Na Laetha Geal M’oige’

Que CD - Templer Hymn book - track 6

Good morning to you all and welcome to our service here in Cowes. For those who travelled to get here, I hope the trip down has been enjoyable and allowed you all to revel in the clarity and beauty of a morning’s ride in the country. I have an image in my memory every time I come to Philip Island – following the San Remo road and, just as you come around the bend coasting down to the township, seeing the horizon open up before me, the cutting in the road giving way to that panoramic view over Westernport bay, the bridge and the Island itself.

Somehow, there is nothing like a trip to the country to sharpen the mind and refresh the soul. Driving through the dappled shade of tree lined roads that take you through rolling hills and prime farmland. When you open a window – the smell of eucalypts, of morning’s misty dampness and of later drying and warming sunshine. The mustiness of farm animals, coupled with the clear crisp air; the greenness of the paddocks: the distance to the horizon, all combining to provide an interesting contrast to our impoverished senses.

And here at Cowes, the smell of the sea - ozone rich air providing a much needed respite for our citified and polluted noses. The sound of the ocean, relentlessly surging over the rocks and sands, washing away the city tension with its continuous caressing action. Quiet - that is what attracts us to places like these. Where car noise is not the backdrop to every outside adventure. Where peace can be found along a cliff top path, or a sandy beach-hugging track.

In the spirit of this feeling, I thought we could open our service with Hymn number 17 – ‘Br er, singt ein Lied der Freude’ – ‘Come, sing a song of joy’, which is sung to the melody of ‘Ode to Joy’ by Beethoven. We will sing the verses one, two and three. The hymn has an introduction on the CD.

Sing Hymn number 17 – ‘Br er, singt ein Lied der Freude’ – ‘Come, sing a song of joy’

Que CD - Templer Hymn book - track 18

Come sing a song of joy, for peace shall come, my brother
Sing, sing a song of joy for men shall love each other.
That day will dawn just as sure as hearts that are pure are hearts set free.
No man must stand alone with outstretched hand before Him.
Come sing a song of joy, of freedom tell the story
Sing, sing a song of joy, for mankind in his glory.
One mighty voice that will bring a sound that will ring for evermore.
Then sing a song of joy for love ands understanding.
Come sing a song of joy for peace shall come, my brother.
Sing, sing a song of joy for men shall love each other.
One mighty voice that will bring a sound that will ring for ever more.
Then sing a song of joy for love and understanding.

Powerful yet simple words of praise and hope for mankind. And, you may have noticed that the English version is nothing like the German. Written in an older hand, the German text speaks of the release offered to mankind if he should follow in Gods path.

Brothers sing the song of joy, for you have reason for thankfulness.
Gods path leads us into the yonder and out of hopelessness.
Without God, no healing for the ailment of body and soul.
Come with us to the Spring of Life whose offer is eternal health
God gave us freedom so that we may be there for one another.
For everyone whose life is worried will be offered joyfulness by him.
Not one has been discounted, for his offer brings our freedom.
Free us that we may love this world, so that in it, freedom may reside.
Freedom to preserve this earth through the strength that Christ has offered.
And for those who accept, discovery what a good Spirit guides them.
Our eyes will see again what threatens those who are outcast,
And again they shall be brothers, sharing bread and healing misery.
Come with us to the Spring of Life whose offer is eternal health
Without God, no healing for the ailment of body and soul.
Gods path leads us into the yonder, God be with us for ever more.
Brothers sing the song of joy, for you have reason for thankfulness.

Somehow, I don’t think I’ll give up my day job in IT to become a professional translator of German Hymns. Than not withstanding, I do think that I captured the essence of its meaning even if I didn’t quite get the rhyming bit.

The point here is that sometimes, when I’m writing a service, I find that I actually read the texts of the hymns contained in our hymn book, rather than just picking one that I know, or that seems appropriate in the context of the day’s lesson. Often, I find words of wisdom contained therein that magically express a feeling or an idea that I may be pondering.

‘Come sing a song of joy’ did exactly that for me as I contemplated today’s text, in that this hymn states quite simply the joy and love that resides in our existence when we embrace a life devoted to and inspired by Gods leadership, guidance and love. Through his love, we are able to know love. By knowing love, we are able to show love. And through showing love, we are able to overcome the many barriers that cause pain – not only for ourselves, but for our fellow mankind.

I am particularly drawn to the words in the English version – ‘That day will dawn, just as sure as hearts that are pure are hearts set free’.

What an interesting concept – hearts that are pure are hearts set free.

There is a sense of inevitability about that statement that is portrayed perfectly by its comparison to the sun rising every day. We all know that the sun rises every day, so why shouldn’t a pure heart be a free heart?

When I think of purity, I immediately think of white light – that for me is the most natural word association. In my minds eye then, I see a globe of white light shining suspended in mid air. Shafts of light radiate out and illuminate the dark corners of the spirit, clearing away the detritus of our cluttered consciousness and cleansing us of our accumulated fears and inhibitions.

When I think of freedom, I think of not be restrained – by anything. Freedom is the wide open spaces in our spirit, where we are able to roam without restriction.

When we combine the two together, we have the purity that is the love that God feels for us and the freedom of spirit that allows us to accept this love unashamedly. And through His love, we are able to express our own love for ourselves and for one another. We become the white light in our pure heart analogy, shining out into space, shedding light on every corner and vanquishing fear and doubt in our path.

It would seem then that the analogy stands firm – a heart that is pure is a heart set free, and perhaps this is a state that we should all aspire to.

Our text today is taken from John 6: verses 22 – 34.

‘The next morning, back across the lake, crowds began gathering….. ‘Sir,’ they said, ‘give us that bread every day of our lives!’

Our text deals with that time in Jesus’ life known as the Galilean ministry. He travels throughout Galilee preaching the word of God, healing and teaching all who choose to come and listen. His ministry is punctuated by the many healings and miracles attributed to him that he used to show that he was the son of God. Immediately preceding our text is the famous parable of the feeding of the 5000, thus the continual reference to that event.

Jesus was at a crucial stage of his ministry, having entered Galilee just before Passover, a time when a great many people were underway to Jerusalem, there to take part in and celebrate the Passover festivities. His time on the road meant that he always had a following of pilgrims and travellers, eager to hear the words of this new prophet, whom everyone they encountered was discussing. Jesus used this time to expand on his burgeoning message – that he had been sent by the Father as his spirit personified on earth, to save mankind from himself and once again, re-establish the pure bond of love between mankind and God that had been broken.

Jesus clearly faced a difficult audience – the way to their heart lay in satisfying the external, worldly interests as is clearly attested to in the text. ‘You must show us more miracles if you want us to believe you are the Messiah. Give us free bread every day, like our fathers had while they journeyed through the wilderness.’ It seems that Jesus realised this, and although he was prepared to play to this requirement, he never lost sight of his purpose – to win their hearts and minds.

‘But you shouldn’t be so concerned about perishable things like food. No, spend your energy seeking the eternal life that I, the Messiah, can give you. For God has sent me for this very purpose’

It is understandable that the people of those times chose to misunderstand him and to seek gratification in the outer, worldly pursuits - life was hard for the average person. I read somewhere that it is only when a person experiences a feeling of well-being and security that they are able to concentrate on more abstract concepts. This usually translates to a steady food supply, a secure place of shelter and a reasonably predictable future. I’m unsure if these are the only criterion, but for our discussion, they suffice.

Obviously, at the time of Jesus’ ministry, these things were not in place. The whole region we know as Israel was occupied by Rome and there was continual insurgency as the local inhabitants sought to lift the yolk of colonial bondage. For the common person, this atmosphere of disruption did not lend itself to great displays of inward contemplation of mans place in the cosmos, much less his relationship with God.

And we must remember that part of Gods plan for Jesus was that he should be the catalyst that broke the hold the Pharisee’s had over the spiritual wellbeing of the common population. Jesus was sent to re-establish direct channels of communion with God, rather than that communion being controlled, as it was, by the organised religious establishment. This put him at odds with the establishment and, by way of their organised power-base, they were in the perfect position to deflect his challenge to their authority. Jesus, especially at this time of his Ministry, was very much the upstart challenger to the established order.

Without doubt, Jesus had a lot of things working against him. And yet, for us, he won his battle.

Out text speaks of the ‘true bread from heaven’. There is no doubt that the references to bread, food and drink are all metaphorical allusions to the sustenance that is required by our spiritual selves to grow and prosper.

There is also no doubt that this sustenance is equally as important to our physical wellbeing as it is for our spiritual wellbeing. Many philosophies speak of the concept of maintaining balance in our lives and this is an area that we can explore ad infinitum.

What constitutes balance? It is easy when looking at a set of cantilever scales, to see that when the weight is greater on one side, it drops and the lighter side rises. It is harder to imagine what happens to a soul when the physical senses are more stimulated than the spiritual. What constitutes an out-of-balance persona? I wouldn’t be too far wrong in venturing that most of us live far more in the physical than in the spiritual. That is, we spend by far more effort and energy on satisfying our physical needs than we do in satisfying our spiritual needs. And it makes sense that this is so. After all, we spend most of our day involved in those necessary pursuits like earning a living that involve interaction with the physical world than we do in nurturing our spiritual self. There is definitely an imbalance.

And yet, this imbalance doesn’t seem to matter. When I think about this relationship, it seems to me that in real time, a few minutes spent on nourishing our spiritual self is the equivalent of spending several hours satisfying our physical needs. I say this because I’ve noticed that a few moments spent in quiet contemplation seems to refresh the spirit and mind well beyond expectation.

Have you ever reached the point during the day where you just can’t go on any more? The noise is too much, the strain is too much, too many people want too much from you and you’re tired, drained emotionally and searching forlornly for some peace. What to do? You sit back, close your eyes and try to block out every sensation that wants to impress itself upon your senses. In your minds eye, you visualise a great big blackboard and in your mind is a blackboard duster. Every time a sensation tries to write itself on that board, you mentally wipe it out with the duster. After a few minutes, you reach a lower level – closer to your core, where the sensations are fewer and a peace begins to descend upon you. A little more time and you descend to another level again. At this level, nothing impresses upon you – you’ve even put down the duster – you are in a state of peace.

As you slowly rouse yourself, you become aware of the clatter and demands again, but you are no longer stressed – that inner peace you felt at the deepest point of your contemplation strengthens you and carries you into the world again. And it’s then that you realise you only had your eyes shut for ten minutes or so.

I feel that this recuperation is closely linked to the spiritual replenishment that we need to keep ourselves in balance. Some people have it naturally, others – like me - need to work at it, but there is no doubt that time spent in quiet contemplation has an effective recuperative and restorative effect on our spiritual selves. At other times, when coupled with a simple prayer, or with positive thoughts of love for others, the effect seems doubled.

Throughout the bible we find many examples where Jesus spoke of this need to replenish our spiritual selves. He practiced it himself, often moving away from the crowds to a place where he could be alone, to commune with his Father in heaven and to contemplate.

Our text today is a lead in to this concept of spiritual refreshment. Jesus asks us to spend time thinking about the ‘true bread from heaven’. It is during those moments of quiet contemplation that we refresh our souls, tune into the rhythms of our life and experience the peace that comes from knowing that we are loved and in the care of God himself.

I, like many of you, have been profoundly moved by the terrible devastation that was inflicted by the tidal wave that struck many of our neighbours and the lands bordering the Indian Ocean. I feel it would be remiss of us to be here at this service and not offer our thoughts and prayers to the many who perished in this disaster and to the many who survived and must now rebuild their lives without their loved ones.

It would be wonderful if we could join together now in a quiet prayer.

Dear Lord,
We stand before you and feel a profound sense of compassion for those whose lives were disrupted so suddenly by the devastation wrought by the Tsunami on Boxing Day last year.
We share a deep sense of loss for those who perished and hope that they have now been delivered into your hands that they may now rest in the peace of your care.
We send a strong message of love to those who survived and hope that they be given the courage and faith to rebuild their lives.
Our Father in heaven,
Hallowed be Your name,
Your Kingdom come,
Your will be done on earth as in heaven.
Give us today our daily bread.
Forgive us our sins,
As we forgive those who sin against us.
Lead us when in temptation and deliver us from evil.
For the Kingdom, the power and the glory
Are Yours forever.
Amen.

To close our service, I thought we could sing Hymn number 64 – ‘Lobe den Herren, den maechtigen Koenig’ – ‘Praise to the Lord, the Almighty’. We will sing the verses one, two and five. The hymn has an introduction on the CD.

Sing Hymn number 64 – ‘Lobe den Herren, den maechtigen Koenig’ – ‘Praise to the Lord, the Almighty’

Que CD – John Denver – A Portrait - track 4, ‘For You’

To see us off, I have chosen the song ‘For You’ from the CD – John Denver – A Portrait. Although a love song, I find the words equally powerful and moving.

I thank you for taking the time to come today and to join us in this service. I would like to thank Harald and Ester Gassmann for arranging the venue and the function and I also thank the Uniting Church Community here in Cowes for allowing us to use their facilities.

I know it’s lunch time, and those of us that travelled, rose early to get here. In closing then, I would like to wish you all a very enjoyable afternoon amongst family and friends and wish you a safe journey home.

Thank you for listening

 

Return to the Top

 

Evensong in Bayswater

Sunday 30th January, 2005 – 6.00pm
Elder Harald Ruff

Accompaniment: Elisabeth Wagner

Hymns: 4. All creatures of our God and King

  • 20. Creation in Australia
  • 62. Let us sing to the God of Salvation
  • 86. One more step
  • 103. Spirit of peace
  • 26. Ehre sei Gott (Glory to God)
  • 11. An evening prayer
  • Text: 1 Corinthians 8: 1-13 About the food offered to idols

    Readings: -

    Sunday School: none

    Musical introduction: Elisabeth

    Good evening and welcome to our Evensong service.

    The inspiration for this evening’s service was provided by Sonja Glenk, who last year made a comment to me about not being able to play hymns that she has picked – the hymns are of course generally selected by the presiding Elder. So I challenged her to ‘pick the hymns’ and I would try to thread them together somehow. I thank Elisabeth for being prepared to be musical director, as my own singing ability is limited – I tend to follow the voices around me, sometimes with disastrous consequences.

    So, to begin the service let us sing the first four verses of hymn number four, ‘All creatures of our God and King’.

    Hymn: 4. All creatures of our God and King 1-4

    I experienced two very distinct emotional responses to this hymn. Firstly, it made me smile, as it reminded me of an episode of Rowan Atkinson’s ‘Mr Bean’ series.

    Despite the direction to sing jubilantly, the second emotion is far less joyous, for the hymn, with its call to the elements and nature to add their voices to the praising of God, refers to and reminds me of the very same elements that combined to cause so much death and destruction last Boxing Day in the Indian Ocean Tsunami. This ‘all- praising’ approach seems hollow after the disaster; certainly it reopened the debate on the role of a ‘loving God’ in such a tragedy, commonly referred to by insurers as an ‘act of God’. Various letter writers and columnists referred to this, and in return others responded. There was much questioning of the role and loving nature of God, and much debate. I’ll refer to this again later.

    The next three verses of the hymn turn from nature to humans and our faith – we sing of forgiving, of dealing with pain and death, of finding strength in Christ’s example.

    Another step on the way - ‘death’, which together with ‘life’ unites us with nature – two things we have in common with all around us. Our existence on earth is finite.

    Let us now sing the last three verses.

    Hymn: 4. All creatures of our God and King 5-7

    "Thou burning sun with golden beam,

    thou silver moon with softer gleam."

    The hymn also reminds me that after every dark time a time of light will follow, and even during dark times we can find light and love, often in the most unexpected places.

    Though we haven’t had any devastating acts of God in Australia for some years, and thankfully nothing on the scale of the tsunami, we are constantly battling drought and bushfires. Yet there are few people who don’t recognise the rugged natural splendour of our ‘wide brown land’. We also have to recognise and accept that nature, our environment, affects and changes us and others, just as we affect and change it.

    Let’s reflect on this beauty and this powerful, influencing force, and the role of the Creator, in our next hymn.

    Hymn: 20. Creation in Australia 1-4

     

    We need to recognise and give thanks for the good things around us. We seem to take all the good for granted, but when the lumps come, we may complain bitterly. This seems a flaw in our character, that we have to train ourselves to reflect on the positive, that for most of us by far outweighs the negative. It’s a battle I fight regularly with myself, especially when I have a cold or the flu and am feeling low. It always strikes me then, when I’m feeling miserable, that in the time since my last affliction I haven’t once thought how lucky I was not to be sick! It’s always the other way around.

    And of course, for Templers both young and old, this hymn must also have special significance, as we give thanks that history brought us to this wonderful country, from a country that continues to be wracked by conflict. A conflict which so frustratingly and illogically seems to have a religious context.

    Our next hymn is very ‘up-beat’, and like our last hymn, focuses us on praising the Lord for the gift that is his creation, for all that is good.

    Hymn: 62. Let us sing to the God of Salvation 1-4

    (Note – German version has only three verses)

    Link verse four to the text "Let today…"

    Our text for today comes from 1 Corinthians 8: 1-13. It is titled ‘About the food offered to idols’, and in it Paul gives the Christian community of Corinth more practical tips on living as a Christian, and reminds them to honour God rather than idols.

    Text: 1 Corinthians 8: 1-13 About the food offered to idols

    I do not want to spend too long on the text, and in fact will touch on only one part that struck when I read it in the shadow of what happened on Boxing Day.

    I found this passage, like my last service in Bentleigh, again struck a chord with so many of my own feelings about my belief and convictions. It is about the struggles that we face daily, imposed by who we are, how we are, and by those around us.

    The text reminded me that it is not what we know, but what we do that is of importance. What good is knowledge if we do not apply it? And in particular, what good is knowledge if we do not apply it in order to help others? ‘Love makes us helpful to others’ the text reminds us. In loving others we serve God rather than the worthless idols we may be drawn to.

    Celebrity, ego, materialism etc

    While helping others can be difficult sometimes, helping financially is sometimes very easy. One letter to the Age during the first few weeks after the Tsunami accused Australians of giving so generously not out of a spirit of generosity, but out of guilt. Give a little, and we’ll feel better and can get on with our lives. Just like it is sometimes hard to help someone, we shouldn’t help just to gain a favour in return – help for the sake of it, because someone needs help, not because you want a reward.

    Similarly, Jesus himself refers to this and suggested giving isn’t really noble if the giving is easy eg Michael Schumacher giving $13 mil.

    What we should take from all this spontaneous generosity (and not just financially) is that we do not, or need not, face the trials of life alone. Our faith constantly reminds us that God is with us every step, either in the spiritual form within us, or in the form of our family and community around us, in whom He also dwells. Our next hymn reminds us of this fact.

    Hymn: 86. One more step

    The past months have been very challenging ones, perhaps for you on a personal level, and certainly for all of us on a global level. They are trying times that challenge belief and personal values. They may be times that challenge our self-worth and confidence. They may lead to frustration and anger, two emotions that cloud our thoughts and lead to even more problems, as we may then lash out in what would normally seem irrational ways. It is times like that when we need others around us, and also the strength to stop ourselves from spiralling downwards. We need the guide on every step of the way, and if we feel strong enough, we can be the guides for others.

    We need to keep in our mind the text I read earlier – How can I best serve God? How do I best love others? The challenge may be to focus a little less on our selves and a little more on others. Reflecting Christian spirit, our next hymn reminds us not only of the influence God’s spirit has, or should have, but also how the spirit should guide us to act as God’s agents of change. In a world wracked by violence, it seems a most appropriate hymn.

    Hymn: 103. Spirit of peace

    Peace certainly seems to be in short supply in the world. My thoughts are immediately drawn to the Middle East and Iraq – what a confusing and frightening situation those people find themselves in. It is so very easy to understand if Iraqis were to feel only despair at this time, their world being a never-ending chain of death and destruction. Some would have felt joy at the end of the previous regime, only to find the ongoing cycle of violence a worse situation.

    But to us this situation, just like the tsunami, seems so surreal. Every day the images are beamed to us, depressing us, yet we are able to simply turn off the television and go back to the very humdrum existence and daily chores. We may curse having to do them, but how lucky we are to have them to grumble about instead of tyranny, invasion and civil war.

    Thanks to technology and the mass media, we are surrounded by violence and regularly exposed to evil, even when it occurs thousands of kilometres away. On the internet, on the nightly news and in newspapers we can see death, destruction, images of torture and despair. History tells us that there has always been cruelty in the world, and despite our ever- developing civilisation, the incidence of it appears to be increasing rather than decreasing – its sound and images are omnipresent. We seem powerless against it and thus fear it.

    As a teacher, and a past student of psychology, I am convinced that our behaviour is very much the result of past experience – yesterday’s events. We are products of our environments, and taken to the extreme, no one is then responsible for their actions. (Thus the lawsuits for people’s own stupid actions?) On the other hand, genetics gives us a different perspective. In this case, our biology is our destiny. Does DNA determine our physical characteristics and personality? If so, evil is simply the result of bad genes.

    And then there is the religious side. God is good, and created everything, yet evil exists. How could a good God create evil people? It would seem that in giving us free will, He allows us to choose to act in good or bad ways. He didn’t create evil, but it simply exists as an opposite of good. I don’t know if there is a clear answer to this conundrum. All we can do is accept that it does exist, and thus work against it. As unpleasant and uncomfortable as evil is, our world makes it necessary for us to face up to it, and deal with it.

    People tend to forget that it is us through whom God acts – thus the recent outpouring of generosity from around the world was so reassuring and uplifting. Nature may be God’s creation, but just as he has given us a conscience to guide our free will, He has left nature to itself. The Earth in some senses is just like us. It can be kind and caring, gentle one day, and the next harsh, cruel and unforgiving. It is up to us to contend with it.

    Religion should be about this world, about living in the real world, and making it a better place. It is not about getting into heaven or being on a guilt trip because someone died for us. Our focus needs to be outward, like that of Jesus, not inward, like that of those who worship false idols, or who claim to know what is right but do not act on it. There is no denying that Christianity is about how you relate to those around you, and that especially includes our Templer brand.

    In my last service I mentioned that I try to remember to ask myself some questions that a colleague had mentioned once (from a newspaper article?): What have I done for others today? How have I helped? How have I grown? What do I have to be thankful for? What do I have to apologise or make-up for? It doesn’t always work. I don’t always remember. But when I do, I challenge myself with these thoughts. Not out loud, not for the benefit or information of others, but just for myself. It can be very demoralising too – you quickly realise why there are so few ‘Mother Teresas’ in the world.

    (Prayer: Lord’s Prayer) Or have hymn number 26 as the prayer?

    Hymn: 26. Ehre sei Gott (Glory to God)

    (Canon – four parts as marked if feeling confident)

    Further on the theme of singing prayer, our final hymn for today is ‘An evening prayer’. It’s a fitting song to sing at this time of day – in the evening! I like it because in it we acknowledge that we may have hurt others, even without realising it, and without intending too. Often I think it’s not so much a case of us offending others, or rather that others offend us, but more frequently that our own expectations may be unrealistic. Does that make sense? There is so much going on in everyone’s life these days that it is easy to overlook something, or we are simply uninformed and make unfair assumptions about others.

    Hymn: 11. An evening prayer

    Closing thought: It is summertime – the start of a new year, the end of another, the festive season just past. Another new beginning – take the time to reflect!

    Closing music: Elisabeth

    Announcements:

    Upcoming events: We don’t have our February TR yet, so check the February TR for details.

    Today’s collection – Our world is still very much dominated by the tragedy of the Indian Ocean Tsunami, and like at the New Year’s Eve service conducted by Alfred Klink, I would like to direct today’s collection to the appeals currently in place to assist in the countries affected.

    Finally, after the service we have to opportunity to spend a little time together. Thanks to the Frauenverein we are being treated to some nibbles and sherry.

    return to the top of page

    end

    last updated 1 - 1 - 2006 by Alfred Klink